IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16640-d1001130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Level Assessment and CO Prediction of Underground Mines for Poisoning and Asphyxiation Accidents

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Liu

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Qian Ma

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Wanqing Wang

    (School of Finance, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics, Kunming 650221, China)

  • Guanding Yang

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Haowen Zhou

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Xinyue Hu

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Liangyun Teng

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

  • Xuehua Luo

    (Faculty of Public Security and Emergency Management, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China)

Abstract

To effectively prevent the occurrence of poisoning and asphyxiation accidents in underground mines, this paper establishes an evaluation index system for the factors influencing accidents, constructs a combined assignment model to solve the problem of low accuracy of assignment results caused by a single algorithm, predicts the CO concentration after blasting because CO poisoning is the main cause of accidents, explores the accuracy of different time series prediction methods, and projects the required ventilation after blasting to ensure the safe operation of personnel. Firstly, starting from “man-machine-environment-management”, social factors are introduced to build an evaluation index system. Secondly, three combinatorial allocation models were compared, namely rough set theory–G1 method (RS-G1), entropy method–G1 method (Entropy-G1), and CRITIC method–G1 method (CRITIC-G1). The best model was selected and the allocation rating model was constructed in combination with the cloud model, and the mine risk level was evaluated by using the model. Thirdly, the GM(1,1) model, the quadratic exponential smoothing method, and the ARIMA model were compared by calculating posterior differences and errors, and the method with the highest accuracy was selected for predicting CO concentration. The results show that the inclusion of social assessment indexes in the assessment index system makes the consideration of assessment indexes more comprehensive. The RS-G1 combined assignment model achieved higher accuracy than other combined assignment models, and the GM(1,1) model had the highest accuracy and the best prediction effect. The results of the study can help provide targeted prevention and management measures for poisoning and asphyxiation accidents in underground mines.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Liu & Qian Ma & Wanqing Wang & Guanding Yang & Haowen Zhou & Xinyue Hu & Liangyun Teng & Xuehua Luo, 2022. "Risk Level Assessment and CO Prediction of Underground Mines for Poisoning and Asphyxiation Accidents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16640-:d:1001130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daolei Xie & Jing Han & Huide Zhang & Kai Wang & Zhongwen Du & Tianyu Miao, 2022. "Risk Assessment of Water Inrush from Coal Seam Roof Based on Combination Weighting-Set Pair Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Dandan Qiu & Yanling Wu & Li Li, 2022. "Evaluation of the Gas Drainage Effect in Deep Loose Coal Seams Based on the Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin Li & Bo Li & Ye Luo & Tao Li & Hang Han & Wenjie Zhang & Beibei Zhang, 2023. "Water-Richness Zoning Technology of Karst Aquifers at in the Roofs of Deep Phosphate Mines Based on Random Forest Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Tao Yan & Chuanqu Zhu & Qingfeng Li & Qian Xu, 2023. "Investigating Disaster Mechanisms Triggered by Abrupt Overburden Fracture Alterations in Close-Seam Mining Beneath an Exceptionally Thick Sandstone Aquifer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Lele Xiao & Fan Li & Chao Niu & Gelian Dai & Qian Qiao & Chengsen Lin, 2022. "Evaluation of Water Inrush Hazard in Coal Seam Roof Based on the AHP-CRITIC Composite Weighted Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Baoxin Zhao & Qimeng Liu & Jingzhong Zhu, 2023. "Risk Assessment and Zonation of Roof Water Inrush Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Principle Component Analysis, and Improved Game Theory (AHP–PCA–IGT) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Aorui Bi & Shuya Huang & Xinguo Sun, 2023. "Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipeline Based on Vague Set-Weighted Set Pair Analysis Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Daolei Xie & Zhongwen Du & Chenghao Han & Jie Han & Jiuchuan Wei & Jiulei Yan, 2023. "Prediction of the Water Inrush Risk from an Overlying Separation Layer in the Thick Overburden of a Thick Coal Seam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16640-:d:1001130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.