IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16122-d992003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Making and Coordination of Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain with PIR under the Different Government Subsidy Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Yao

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
    College of Science, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, China)

  • Dongyan Chen

    (School of Science, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Hui Yu

    (School of Automation, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China)

Abstract

Government subsidies and process innovation for remanufacturing (PIR) have become effective measures to improve the recycling and remanufacturing efficiency of waste products and promote sustainable economic development. Under different government subsidy strategies, the PIR decision and coordination of the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) of authorized competition remanufacturing are studied. This paper constructs five centralized and decentralized decision models of CLSC and analyzes the influence of government subsidy strategy and PIR input entity differences on the competition and cooperation relationship between manufacturers and remanufacturers and the performance of CLSC. A fixed license fee contract is designed to realize CLSC coordination and to improve the performance and operational efficiency of the CLSC. It is found that patent licensing fees can always play a role in sharing government subsidies between the manufacturer and remanufacturer, and making changes in government subsidy strategies only affects formulation of patent licensing fees. Manufacturer PIR input mode is more conducive to improving the market demand for new products, while remanufacturer PIR input mode is more conducive to improving the PIR input level, remanufactured product market demand, CLSC members and overall performance. Moreover, government subsidies can produce better efficiency and effects under remanufacturer PIR input mode. A fixed license fee contract can coordinate a CLSC effectively. The increase in government subsidies and PIR input effect can effectively expand the negotiation space between the manufacturer and remanufacturer, which is conducive to achievement of coordination contracts. Finally, the main conclusions are verified by numerical analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Yao & Dongyan Chen & Hui Yu, 2022. "Decision-Making and Coordination of Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain with PIR under the Different Government Subsidy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16122-:d:992003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Huihui & Lei, Ming & Deng, Honghui & Keong Leong, G. & Huang, Tao, 2016. "A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 290-302.
    2. Yue Wang & Baoying Xin & Zhe Wang & Bangyi Li, 2019. "Managing Supplier-Manufacturer Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Product Design and Take-Back Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Dingyue Zhang & Xuemei Zhang & Bin Shi & Jian Cao & Gengui Zhou, 2018. "Collection and Remanufacturing of Waste Products under Patent Protection and Government Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Mitra, Supriya & Webster, Scott, 2008. "Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 287-298, February.
    6. Huaixi Song & Quanxi Li & Kailing Liu & Yi Li, 2022. "The Recycling Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering CSR under the Government’s Reward–Penalty Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Yufei Hu & Lianghua Chen & Yingying Chi & Bowen Song, 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment on a closed‐loop supply chain with design for remanufacturing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1941-1959, September.
    8. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    9. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    10. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Huihui Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Hui Ding & G. Keong Leong, 2017. "Optimal Remanufacturing Certification Contracts in the Electrical and Electronic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, March.
    4. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    5. Yue Tan & Chunxiang Guo, 2019. "Research on Two-Way Logistics Operation with Uncertain Recycling Quality in Government Multi-Policy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Renbang Shan & Li Luo & Baoli Shi, 2023. "The choice of recycling strategies for decision-makers based on government subsidy and service budget," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1441-1472, February.
    7. Chenxu Ke & Bo Yan & Jingna Ji, 2023. "Pricing new and remanufactured products under patent protection and government intervention," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 131-161, May.
    8. Yunting Feng & Yong Geng & Ge Zhao & Mengya Li, 2022. "Carbon Emission Constraint Policy in an OEM and Outsourcing Remanufacturer Supply Chain with Consumer Preferences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    10. Mohammed Alkahtani & Aiman Ziout & Bashir Salah & Moath Alatefi & Abd Elatty E. Abd Elgawad & Ahmed Badwelan & Umar Syarif, 2021. "An Insight into Reverse Logistics with a Focus on Collection Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.
    12. Lijun Meng & Qiang Qiang & Zuqing Huang & Baoyou Zhang & Yuxiang Yang, 2020. "Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-29, March.
    13. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    14. Zhiqiao Wu & C.K. Kwong & C.K.M. Lee & Jiafu Tang, 2016. "Joint decision of product configuration and remanufacturing for product family design," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(15), pages 4689-4702, August.
    15. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    16. Matsui, Kenji, 2022. "Optimal timing of acquisition price announcement for used products in a dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 615-632.
    17. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    18. Pietro Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2019. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," 4OR, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    19. Luo, Li & Shan, Renbang & Xiang, Jie, 2024. "The government intervention effectiveness in promoting remanufacturing: Subsidy or remanufacturing target?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16122-:d:992003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.