IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15978-d988965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Methodology for Estimating the Potential Biomethane Production in a Region: Application in a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Sánchez Nocete

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

  • Javier Pérez Rodríguez

    (Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, E.T.S. Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28006 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Biomethane is an example of a biofuel that is currently gaining interest due to its possible use as a substitute for natural gas and due to its generation in a “power to gas” production scheme. It can be injected into the gas network under certain purity requirements. It can also act as a source for the production of “green hydrogen”. This paper proposes a simple methodology to estimate the potential to obtain biomethane through the anaerobic digestion of biowaste in a delimited region. The mentioned methodology consists of the following main steps: (i) estimation of the potential biowaste from different sources in the region; (ii) characterization of each type of biowaste production; (iii) estimation of biogas production for each type of biowaste according to the selected anaerobic digestion process; and (iv) estimation of potential biomethane production through the purification of the biogas produced. The different types of biowaste that this methodology considers are the organic fraction of municipal solid waste, agroindustrial solid biowaste (biowaste from the food industry and livestock), and sewage sludge (urban and industrial). Energy crops are not considered because they are not treated as biowaste. After defining the proposed methodology, it is applied to a Spanish case study, in which the potential to obtain biomethane in Spain in 2019 is estimated. The results show that in Spain, around 4499 ktoe could be obtained if all biowaste was destined to produce biomethane, which would allow 31.6% of the final demand for natural gas to be satisfied in a sustainable way. In that sense, a double effect on climate change mitigation can be obtained, reducing use of fossil fuels and minimizing the final biowaste disposal into landfills.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Sánchez Nocete & Javier Pérez Rodríguez, 2022. "A Simple Methodology for Estimating the Potential Biomethane Production in a Region: Application in a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15978-:d:988965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15978/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15978/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thema, M. & Bauer, F. & Sterner, M., 2019. "Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 775-787.
    2. Ruggero Bellini & Ilaria Bassani & Arianna Vizzarro & Annalisa Abdel Azim & Nicolò Santi Vasile & Candido Fabrizio Pirri & Francesca Verga & Barbara Menin, 2022. "Biological Aspects, Advancements and Techno-Economical Evaluation of Biological Methanation for the Recycling and Valorization of CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, June.
    3. Mancini, Gabriele & Papirio, Stefano & Lens, Piet N.L. & Esposito, Giovanni, 2018. "Increased biogas production from wheat straw by chemical pretreatments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 608-614.
    4. Rachbauer, Lydia & Voitl, Gregor & Bochmann, Günther & Fuchs, Werner, 2016. "Biological biogas upgrading capacity of a hydrogenotrophic community in a trickle-bed reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 483-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marie-Noël Mansour & Thomas Lendormi & Nicolas Louka & Richard G. Maroun & Zeina Hobaika & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Droppings in Semi-Continuous Mode and Effect of Their Co-Digestion with Physico-Chemical Sludge on Methane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jensen, M.B. & Ottosen, L.D.M. & Kofoed, M.V.W., 2021. "H2 gas-liquid mass transfer: A key element in biological Power-to-Gas methanation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Ruggero Bellini & Ilaria Bassani & Arianna Vizzarro & Annalisa Abdel Azim & Nicolò Santi Vasile & Candido Fabrizio Pirri & Francesca Verga & Barbara Menin, 2022. "Biological Aspects, Advancements and Techno-Economical Evaluation of Biological Methanation for the Recycling and Valorization of CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-34, June.
    3. Andrea Barbaresi & Mirko Morini & Agostino Gambarotta, 2022. "Review on the Status of the Research on Power-to-Gas Experimental Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Georgios Varvoutis & Athanasios Lampropoulos & Evridiki Mandela & Michalis Konsolakis & George E. Marnellos, 2022. "Recent Advances on CO 2 Mitigation Technologies: On the Role of Hydrogenation Route via Green H 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-38, June.
    6. David Borge-Diez & Enrique Rosales-Asensio & Emin Açıkkalp & Daniel Alonso-Martínez, 2023. "Analysis of Power to Gas Technologies for Energy Intensive Industries in European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Martin Thema & Tobias Weidlich & Manuel Hörl & Annett Bellack & Friedemann Mörs & Florian Hackl & Matthias Kohlmayer & Jasmin Gleich & Carsten Stabenau & Thomas Trabold & Michael Neubert & Felix Ortlo, 2019. "Biological CO 2 -Methanation: An Approach to Standardization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-32, May.
    8. Navarro, J.C. & Baena-Moreno, F.M. & Centeno, M.A. & Laguna, O.H. & Almagro, J.F. & Odriozola, J.A., 2023. "Process design and utilisation strategy for CO2 capture in flue gases. Technical assessment and preliminary economic approach for steel mills," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    9. Yasmine Ryma Ouahabi & Kenza Bensadok & Abdeldjalil Ouahabi, 2021. "Optimization of the Biomethane Production Process by Anaerobic Digestion of Wheat Straw Using Chemical Pretreatments Coupled with Ultrasonic Disintegration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Zheng, Lei & Cheng, Shikun & Han, Yanzhao & Wang, Min & Xiang, Yue & Guo, Jiali & Cai, Di & Mang, Heinz-Peter & Dong, Taili & Li, Zifu & Yan, Zhengxu & Men, Yu, 2020. "Bio-natural gas industry in China: Current status and development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Ebrahimian, Farinaz & Karimi, Keikhosro & Angelidaki, Irini, 2022. "Coproduction of hydrogen, butanol, butanediol, ethanol, and biogas from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste using bacterial cocultivation followed by anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 552-560.
    12. Lena Maria Ringsgwandl & Johannes Schaffert & Nils Brücken & Rolf Albus & Klaus Görner, 2022. "Current Legislative Framework for Green Hydrogen Production by Electrolysis Plants in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Chauvy, Remi & Dubois, Lionel & Lybaert, Paul & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2020. "Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    14. Zhang, Cunsheng & Kang, Xinxin & Wang, Fenghuan & Tian, Yufei & Liu, Tao & Su, Yanyan & Qian, Tingting & Zhang, Yifeng, 2020. "Valorization of food waste for cost-effective reducing sugar recovery in a two-stage enzymatic hydrolysis platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    15. Bidart, Christian & Wichert, Martin & Kolb, Gunther & Held, Michael, 2022. "Biogas catalytic methanation for biomethane production as fuel in freight transport - A carbon footprint assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    16. Corey Duncan & Robin Roche & Samir Jemei & Marie-Cécile Péra, 2022. "Techno-economical modelling of a power-to-gas system for plant configuration evaluation in a local context," Post-Print hal-03692975, HAL.
    17. Voelklein, M.A. & Rusmanis, Davis & Murphy, J.D., 2019. "Biological methanation: Strategies for in-situ and ex-situ upgrading in anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1061-1071.
    18. Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Skiadas, Ioannis V. & Gavala, Hariklia N., 2020. "Modeling of syngas biomethanation and catabolic route control in mesophilic and thermophilic mixed microbial consortia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    19. Upadhyay, Mukesh & Kim, Ayeon & Paramanantham, SalaiSargunan S. & Kim, Heehyang & Lim, Dongjun & Lee, Sunyoung & Moon, Sangbong & Lim, Hankwon, 2022. "Three-dimensional CFD simulation of proton exchange membrane water electrolyser: Performance assessment under different condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    20. Simioni, Taysnara & Agustini, Caroline Borges & Dettmer, Aline & Gutterres, Mariliz, 2022. "Enhancement of biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of leather waste with raw and pretreated wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15978-:d:988965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.