IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15802-d986270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Incubated Startups’ Continuance Intention towards Entrepreneurial Incubation Platforms: Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanan Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China)

  • Xinmin Liu

    (College of Economics and Management, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China)

  • Liu Fan

    (Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

Abstract

In recent years, despite the rapid growth in the number of entrepreneurial incubation platforms in China, many of them are experiencing the sustainability dilemma caused by the loss of incubated startups. However, there is a dearth of research that explores how to promote incubated startups’ continuance intention towards entrepreneurial incubation platforms. Addressing this gap, the present study develops a dedication–constraint model based on the dual model framework, investigating the distinct impacts of entrepreneurial support and relationship-specific investment on incubated startups’ continuance intention towards entrepreneurial incubation platforms. A sample of 534 incubated startups in China was employed to test the research model, and the structural equation modelling was adopted for data analysis. Empirical results indicate that the dedication-based mechanism and constraint-based mechanism simultaneously, yet differently, affect incubated startups’ continuance intention towards entrepreneurial incubation platforms. Specifically, in the dedication-based mechanism, social support and technical support are revealed as the antecedents to relationship satisfaction that significantly leads to benefit-based dependence. As for the constraint-based mechanism, setup activity is the only salient indicator to termination costs, which consequently has a positive effect on cost-based dependence. Incubated startups’ continuance intention towards entrepreneurial incubation platforms is influenced by both benefit-based dependence and cost-based dependence, ultimately.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanan Zhang & Xinmin Liu & Liu Fan, 2022. "Understanding Incubated Startups’ Continuance Intention towards Entrepreneurial Incubation Platforms: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15802-:d:986270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2022. "A Dempster-Shafer-theory-based entry screening mechanism for small and medium-sized enterprises under uncertainty," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Kollmann, Tobias & Stöckmann, Christoph & Kensbock, Julia M., 2017. "Fear of failure as a mediator of the relationship between obstacles and nascent entrepreneurial activity—An experimental approach," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 280-301.
    4. Gao, Qiuling & Cui, Lin & Lew, Yong Kyu & Li, Zijie & Khan, Zaheer, 2021. "Business incubators as international knowledge intermediaries: Exploring their role in the internationalization of start-ups from an emerging market," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4).
    5. Vanderstraeten, Johanna & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen & Matthyssens, Paul, 2020. "Organizational sponsorship and service co-development: A contingency view on service co-development directiveness of business incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02014389, HAL.
    7. Zouhaïer M’Chirgui & Wadid Lamine & Sarfraz Mian & Alain Fayolle, 2018. "University technology commercialization through new venture projects: an assessment of the French regional incubator program," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1142-1160, October.
    8. Baofeng Huo & Barbara B. Flynn & Xiande Zhao, 2017. "Supply Chain Power Configurations and Their Relationship with Performance," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(2), pages 88-111, April.
    9. Mian, Sarfraz & Lamine, Wadid & Fayolle, Alain, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 50, pages 1-12.
    10. María Redondo & Carmen Camarero, 2019. "Social Capital in University Business Incubators: dimensions, antecedents and outcomes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 599-624, June.
    11. Wang, Zhaoxing & He, Qile & Xia, Senmao & Sarpong, David & Xiong, Ailun & Maas, Gideon, 2020. "Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Sarfraz Mian & Wadid Lamine & Alain Fayolle, 2016. "Technology Business Incubation : An overview of the state of knowledge," Post-Print hal-02313371, HAL.
    13. Lukeš, Martin & Longo, Maria Cristina & Zouhar, Jan, 2019. "Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 82, pages 25-34.
    14. Chen, Jin & Heng, Cheng Suang & Tan, Bernard C.Y. & Lin, Zhijie, 2018. "The distinct signaling effects of R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy on IPO performance of IT entrepreneurial firms in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 108-120.
    15. van Weele, Marijn & van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Nauta, Frans, 2017. "You can't always get what you want: How entrepreneur's perceived resource needs affect the incubator's assertiveness," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 18-33.
    16. Sikandar Ali Qalati & Dragana Ostic & Mohammad Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman & Aamir Ali Gopang & Asadullah Khan, 2022. "Social Media and SMEs’ Performance in Developing Countries: Effects of Technological-Organizational-Environmental Factors on the Adoption of Social Media," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    17. Hiroshi Kitamura & Akira Miyaoka & Misato Sato, 2016. "Relationship-specific investment as a barrier to entry," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 17-45, September.
    18. Xiaolong Wang & Wenkun Zhang & Tao Zhang & Yanan Wang & Sanggyun Na, 2022. "A Study of Chinese Consumers’ Consistent Use of Mobile Food Ordering Apps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    19. Zouhaïer M’chirgui & Wadid Lamine & Sarfraz Mian & Alain Fayolle, 2018. "University technology commercialization through new venture projects : an assessment of the French regional incubator program," Post-Print hal-02311984, HAL.
    20. Daekil Kim & Byoungsoo Kim, 2018. "An Integrative View of Emotion and the Dedication-Constraint Model in the Case of Coffee Chain Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samuel Pierre & Jocelin Dupénor & Raymond Kernizan & Marc-Donald Vincent & Stéphane Dauphin-Pierre & Jimmy Pierre, 2023. "Analysis of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Northern Haiti to Stimulate Innovation and Reduce Poverty," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 32(2_suppl), pages 117-141, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vidit Mohan & Rohan Chinchwadkar, 2022. "Technology Business Incubation: A Literature Review and Gaps," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 53-63, June.
    2. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Bibeau, Jean & Meilleur, Roxane & St-Jean, Étienne, 2024. "To formalize, or not to formalize, business incubators’ networks: That is not the question," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    4. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    5. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Eveleens, Chris P., 2021. "Money Don't matter? How incubation experience affects start-up entrepreneurs' resource valuation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Brian J. Bergman & Jeffery S. McMullen, 2022. "Helping Entrepreneurs Help Themselves: A Review and Relational Research Agenda on Entrepreneurial Support Organizations," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(3), pages 688-728, May.
    7. Charlene L. Nicholls-Nixon & Dave Valliere & Steven A. Gedeon & Sean Wise, 2021. "Entrepreneurial ecosystems and the lifecycle of university business incubators: An integrative case study," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 809-837, June.
    8. Chenghua Guan & Shengxue Jin, 2023. "Does the Type of Funding Affect Innovation? Evidence from Incubators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Shekhar, Himanshu & Satyanarayana, Krishna & Chandrashekar, Deepak, 2023. "Role and contributions of an incubator in academic intrapreneurship – An examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Manhart, Niklas, 2022. "The Mission Comes First: Exploring the Mechanisms of Organizational Sponsorship for the Acceleration of Social Start-Ups," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 289-337.
    11. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    12. Xiangfei Yuan & Haijing Hao & Chenghua Guan & Alex Pentland, 2021. "What are the key components of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a developing economy? A longitudinal empirical study on technology business incubators in China," Papers 2103.08131, arXiv.org.
    13. Mingfeng Tang & Hao Huang & Grace Walsh & Maribel Guerrero, 2023. "The impact of entrepreneurial overconfidence on incubator effectiveness," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 416-440, February.
    14. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Zaouali, Sana, 2022. "The effects of financial inclusion and the business environment in spurring the creation of early-stage firms and supporting established firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Nair, Sujith & Blomquist, Tomas, 2021. "Exploring docility: A behavioral approach to interventions in business incubation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(7).
    16. Wang, Zhaoxing & He, Qile & Xia, Senmao & Sarpong, David & Xiong, Ailun & Maas, Gideon, 2020. "Capacities of business incubator and regional innovation performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Klofsten, Magnus & Lundmark, Erik & Wennberg, Karl & Bank, Nata, 2020. "Incubator specialization and size: Divergent paths towards operational scale," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    18. Vanderstraeten, Johanna & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen & Matthyssens, Paul, 2020. "Organizational sponsorship and service co-development: A contingency view on service co-development directiveness of business incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    19. Son, Hosung & Chung, Yanghon & Yoon, Sangpil, 2022. "How can university technology holding companies bridge the Valley of Death? Evidence from Korea," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Joshi, Kshitija & S, Krishna H & Loganathan, Muralidharan, 2021. "Resources or Capabilities: A Study of Startup Emergence within Applied Research Universities in India," SocArXiv uevnj, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15802-:d:986270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.