IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15748-d985035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Water Rights Trading and Pricing Model between Agriculture and Energy Development in Ningxia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Changhai Qin

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Shan Jiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Yong Zhao

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Yongnan Zhu

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Qingming Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Lizhen Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Junlin Qu

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Ming Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
    Department of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

Abstract

The contradiction between the supply and demand of water resources has become increasingly prominent, and water rights trading is an effective approach to increase the efficiency of water resource utilization and allocation so as to achieve sustainable use of water resources. Current transferring cost and price in China are both underestimated, taking into account the construction and maintenance fee of water conservation project and the irrigation risk compensation fee but ignoring the renovation and reconstruction fee of water conservation projects, and the compensation fee for farmers. This paper takes assignee rights, assignee capacity, and compensation to third parties into comprehensive considerations in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, where the contradictions between water, energy and food are most prominent in China. Tradable water use rights were analyzed based on a water transfer pricing model. The results show that there is an obvious negative correlation between shadow water price and water usage, and the shadow price of water resources is between 10.91 and 40.52 CNY/m 3 , which is an optimal solution under the constraint of water usage from 6.65 to 7.03 billion m 3 . The reasonable water transfer price is 10.91 CYN/m 3 , of which the earning of the agricultural assignor was 5.96 CNY/m 3 . This price guarantees the interests of the assignee and is also affordable to the assignee. This research provides a specific calculation method for the transfer pricing of water rights under non-market conditions, which is of important theoretically and has practical significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Changhai Qin & Shan Jiang & Yong Zhao & Yongnan Zhu & Qingming Wang & Lizhen Wang & Junlin Qu & Ming Wang, 2022. "Research on Water Rights Trading and Pricing Model between Agriculture and Energy Development in Ningxia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15748-:d:985035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15748/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15748/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yahaya Sani & Miklas Scholz, 2022. "Gender and Other Vulnerabilities to Water–Energy Accessibility in Rural Households of Katsina State, Northern Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, 2014. "Property rights and sustainable irrigation: A developing country perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 23-31.
    3. Bieber, Niclas & Ker, Jen Ho & Wang, Xiaonan & Triantafyllidis, Charalampos & van Dam, Koen H. & Koppelaar, Rembrandt H.E.M. & Shah, Nilay, 2018. "Sustainable planning of the energy-water-food nexus using decision making tools," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 584-607.
    4. Ari M. Michelsen & Robert A. Young, 1993. "Optioning Agricultural Water Rights for Urban Water Supplies During Drought," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(4), pages 1010-1020.
    5. Ziolkowska, Jadwiga R., 2015. "Shadow price of water for irrigation—A case of the High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 20-31.
    6. Berck, Peter & Lipow, Jonathan, 1994. "Real and ideal water rights: the prospects for water-rights reform in Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank," CUDARE Working Papers 43743, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Donna Brennan, 2006. "Water policy reform in Australia: lessons from the Victorian seasonal water market ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(3), pages 403-423, September.
    8. Brennan, Donna C., 2006. "Water policy reform in Australia: lessons from the Victorian seasonal water market," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(3), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Lijin Zhong & Arthur Mol, 2010. "Water Price Reforms in China: Policy-Making and Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(2), pages 377-396, January.
    10. Berck, Peter & Lipow, Jonathan, 1994. "Real and ideal water rights: the prospects for water-rights reform in Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank," CUDARE Working Paper Series 0698R, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy.
    11. Yoo, James & Simonit, Silvio & Connors, John P. & Maliszewski, Paul J. & Kinzig, Ann P. & Perrings, Charles, 2013. "The value of agricultural water rights in agricultural properties in the path of development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 57-68.
    12. Wang, Y.B. & Liu, D. & Cao, X.C. & Yang, Z.Y. & Song, J.F. & Chen, D.Y. & Sun, S.K., 2017. "Agricultural water rights trading and virtual water export compensation coupling model: A case study of an irrigation district in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 180(PA), pages 99-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Baili & Duan, Quntao & Zhao, Wenzhi & Wang, Lixin & Zhong, Yanxia & Zhuang, Yanli & Chang, Xueli & Dong, Chunyuan & Du, Wentao & Luo, Lihui, 2023. "Oasis sustainability is related to water supply mode," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Liu & Peng Li & Zhiwei Zhang, 2018. "Resilient or Not: A Comparative Case Study of Ten Local Water Markets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Sarah Wheeler & Henning Bjornlund & Martin Shanahan & Alec Zuo, 2008. "Price elasticity of water allocations demand in the Goulburn-Murray Irrigation District ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(1), pages 37-55, March.
    3. Robert Brooks & Edwyna Harris & Yovina Joymungul, 2013. "Price clustering in Australian water markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 677-685, February.
    4. Enrique Ballestero, 2004. "Inter-Basin Water Transfer Public Agreements: A Decision Approach to Quantity and Price," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 18(1), pages 75-88, February.
    5. M. Ejaz Qureshi & Jeff Connor & Mac Kirby & Mohammed Mainuddin, 2007. "Economic assessment of acquiring water for environmental flows in the Murray Basin ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(3), pages 283-303, September.
    6. Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2022. "Debunking Murray‐Darling Basin water trade myths," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(4), pages 797-821, October.
    7. Wheeler, Sarah Ann & Zuo, Alec & Bjornlund, Henning, 2014. "Investigating the delayed on-farm consequences of selling water entitlements in the Murray-Darling Basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 72-82.
    8. Craig D. Broadbent & David S. Brookshire & Don Coursey & Vince Tidwell, 2017. "Futures Contracts in Water Leasing: An Experimental Analysis Using Basin Characteristics of the Rio Grande, NM," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(3), pages 569-594, November.
    9. Loch, Adam & Bjornlund, Henning & Wheeler, Sarah & Connor, Jeff, 2012. "Allocation trade in Australia: a qualitative understanding or irrigator motives and behaviour," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(1), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Wu, Zheng & Tian, Guiliang & Xia, Qing & Hu, Hao & Li, Jiawen, 2023. "Connotation, calculation and influencing factors of the water-use rights benchmark price: A case study of agricultural water use in the Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Raffensperger, John F., 2011. "Matching users' rights to available groundwater," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(6), pages 1041-1050, April.
    12. Huong Dinh & Manannan Donoghoe & Neal Hughes & Tim Goesch, 2019. "A micro-simulation model of irrigation farms in the southern Murray-Darling Basin," Papers 1903.05781, arXiv.org.
    13. Robert Brooks & Edwyna Harris & Yovina Joymungul, 2009. "Market depth in an illiquid market: applying the VNET concept to Victorian water markets," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(13), pages 1361-1364.
    14. Guilfoos, Todd & Garnache, Cloe & Suter, Jordan F. & Merrill, Nathaniel H., 2017. "Efficiency Gains Arising from Dynamic Groundwater Markets," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258438, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Eirik S. Amundsen & Frank Jensen, 2016. "Drought and Groundwater Management," IFRO Working Paper 2016/04, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    16. Eirik S. Amundsen & Frank Jensen, 2016. "Drought and Groundwater Management," CESifo Working Paper Series 5968, CESifo.
    17. David Adamson & Adam Loch, 2018. "Achieving environmental flows where buyback is constrained," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(1), pages 83-102, January.
    18. Donna Brennan, 2008. "Missing markets for storage and the potential economic cost of expanding the spatial scope of water trade," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(4), pages 471-485, December.
    19. Neal Hughes & Manannan Donoghoe & Linden Whittle, 2020. "Farm Level Effects of On‐Farm Irrigation Infrastructure Programs in the Southern Murray–Darling Basin," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 53(4), pages 494-516, December.
    20. Ansink, Erik & Houba, Harold, 2012. "Market power in water markets," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 237-252.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15748-:d:985035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.