IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15737-d984668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building with Nature—Ecosystem Service Assessment of Coastal-Protection Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald Schernewski

    (Coastal & Marine Management Group, Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
    Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto Ave. 17, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Lars Niklas Voeckler

    (Coastal & Marine Management Group, Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
    Department of Human Geography, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Goldschmidtstraße 5, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany)

  • Leon Lambrecht

    (Coastal & Marine Management Group, Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
    Institute for Biosciences, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Straße 3, D-18059 Rostock, Germany)

  • Esther Robbe

    (Coastal & Marine Management Group, Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
    Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto Ave. 17, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

  • Johanna Schumacher

    (Coastal & Marine Management Group, Leibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestrasse 15, Warnemünde, D-18119 Rostock, Germany
    Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Universiteto Ave. 17, LT-92294 Klaipeda, Lithuania)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess existing conventional and hypothetical nature-based coastal-protection schemes using a comparative ecosystem service assessment, based on quantitative data and literature as well as on stakeholder views. We assessed three conventional groin systems and three building-with-nature scenarios including an expanded beach area, a mussel farm and seagrass beds. Stakeholders perceived the nature-based scenarios as positive and assumed an overall increase in the ecosystem service provision. The quantitative data-based approach showed similar results. Building-with-nature approaches were considered to provide economical and/or environmental benefits to human beings, beyond coastal protection and safety. Especially for the combination of coastal-protection measures with submerged vegetation in shallow waters, a strong increase in ecosystem service potential is assumed, e.g., on nature restoration as well as on touristic and landscape attractiveness. Our approach turned out to be suitable for assessing different coastal-protection scenarios with reasonable effort. Our methodology can help to catch the views of people, raise awareness on the multiple consequences of these measures and enable an improved and structured participatory dialogue with locals and stakeholders. Our approach may support coastal-protection planning and help to reduce local resistance against measures and their implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald Schernewski & Lars Niklas Voeckler & Leon Lambrecht & Esther Robbe & Johanna Schumacher, 2022. "Building with Nature—Ecosystem Service Assessment of Coastal-Protection Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15737-:d:984668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15737/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15737/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stijn Temmerman & Patrick Meire & Tjeerd J. Bouma & Peter M. J. Herman & Tom Ysebaert & Huib J. De Vriend, 2013. "Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change," Nature, Nature, vol. 504(7478), pages 79-83, December.
    2. Rebecca L. Morris & Anthony Boxshall & Stephen E. Swearer, 2020. "Climate-resilient coasts require diverse defence solutions," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(6), pages 485-487, June.
    3. Ariana E. Sutton-Grier & Rachel K. Gittman & Katie K. Arkema & Richard O. Bennett & Jeff Benoit & Seth Blitch & Kelly A. Burks-Copes & Allison Colden & Alyssa Dausman & Bryan M. DeAngelis & A. Randall, 2018. "Investing in Natural and Nature-Based Infrastructure: Building Better Along Our Coasts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Giakoumis, Theodoros & Voulvoulis, Nikolaos, 2018. "A participatory ecosystems services approach for pressure prioritisation in support of the Water Framework Directive," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 126-135.
    5. Grizzetti, B. & Liquete, C. & Antunes, P. & Carvalho, L. & Geamănă, N. & Giucă, R. & Leone, M. & McConnell, S. & Preda, E. & Santos, R. & Turkelboom, F. & Vădineanu, A. & Woods, H., 2016. "Ecosystem services for water policy: Insights across Europe," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 179-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lam Thi Mai Huynh & Jie Su & Quanli Wang & Lindsay C. Stringer & Adam D. Switzer & Alexandros Gasparatos, 2024. "Meta-analysis indicates better climate adaptation and mitigation performance of hybrid engineering-natural coastal defence measures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Ioannis Souliotis & Nikolaos Voulvoulis, 2021. "Natural Capital Accounting Informing Water Management Policies in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Strain, E.M.A. & Kompas, T. & Boxshall, A. & Kelvin, J. & Swearer, S. & Morris, R.L., 2022. "Assessing the coastal protection services of natural mangrove forests and artificial rock revetments," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    4. Pham, Hung Vuong & Sperotto, Anna & Furlan, Elisa & Torresan, Silvia & Marcomini, Antonio & Critto, Andrea, 2021. "Integrating Bayesian Networks into ecosystem services assessment to support water management at the river basin scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Yui Omori, 2021. "Preference Heterogeneity of Coastal Gray, Green, and Hybrid Infrastructure against Sea-Level Rise: A Choice Experiment Application in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Miguel Inácio & Gerald Schernewski & Dimitra Alkisti Pliatsika & Juliane Benz & René Friedland, 2019. "Assessing Changes in Ecosystem Services Provision in Coastal Waters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Ingrid Nesheim & Line Barkved, 2019. "The Suitability of the Ecosystem Services Framework for Guiding Benefit Assessments in Human-Modified Landscapes Exemplified by Regulated Watersheds—Implications for a Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Octavio Pérez-Maqueo & M. Luisa Martínez & Flor C. Sánchez-Barradas & Melanie Kolb, 2018. "Assessing Nature-Based Coastal Protection against Disasters Derived from Extreme Hydrometeorological Events in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Pérez-Maqueo, Octavio & Martínez, M. Luisa & Cóscatl Nahuacatl, Rosendo, 2017. "Is the protection of beach and dune vegetation compatible with tourism?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 175-183.
    10. Reguero, Borja G. & Beck, Michael W. & Schmid, David & Stadtmüller, Daniel & Raepple, Justus & Schüssele, Stefan & Pfliegner, Kerstin, 2020. "Financing coastal resilience by combining nature-based risk reduction with insurance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Zhiyi Lin & Minerva Singh, 2024. "Assessing Coastal Vulnerability and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Natural Habitats in Enhancing Coastal Resilience: A Case Study in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    12. Álvarez, Xana & Gómez-Rúa, María & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2019. "Risk prevention of land flood: A cooperative game theory approach," MPRA Paper 91515, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Carolus, Johannes Friedrich & Hanley, Nick & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Pedersen, Søren Marcus, 2018. "A Bottom-up Approach to Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 282-295.
    14. Roche, R.C. & Walker-Springett, K. & Robins, P.E. & Jones, J. & Veneruso, G. & Whitton, T.A. & Piano, M. & Ward, S.L. & Duce, C.E. & Waggitt, J.J. & Walker-Springett, G.R. & Neill, S.P. & Lewis, M.J. , 2016. "Research priorities for assessing potential impacts of emerging marine renewable energy technologies: Insights from developments in Wales (UK)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1327-1341.
    15. Takahiro Tsuge & Yasushi Shoji & Koichi Kuriyama & Ayumi Onuma, 2022. "Using a Choice Experiment to Understand Preferences for Disaster Risk Reduction with Uncertainty: A Case Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Chen, Haojie, 2020. "Complementing conventional environmental impact assessments of tourism with ecosystem service valuation: A case study of the Wulingyuan Scenic Area, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    17. Anacleto Rizzo & Giulio Conte & Fabio Masi, 2021. "Adjusted Unit Value Transfer as a Tool for Raising Awareness on Ecosystem Services Provided by Constructed Wetlands for Water Pollution Control: An Italian Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    18. Carus, Jana & Heuner, Maike & Paul, Maike & Schröder, Boris, 2017. "Which factors and processes drive the spatio-temporal dynamics of brackish marshes?—Insights from development and parameterisation of a mechanistic vegetation model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 363(C), pages 122-136.
    19. Maria Fabrizia Clemente & Valeria D’Ambrosio & Ferdinando Di Martino & Vittorio Miraglia, 2023. "Quantify the Contribution of Nature-Based Solutions in Reducing the Impacts of Hydro-Meteorological Hazards in the Urban Environment: A Case Study in Naples, Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Priscila Celebrini de Oliveira Campos & Tainá da Silva Rocha Paz & Letícia Lenz & Yangzi Qiu & Camila Nascimento Alves & Ana Paula Roem Simoni & José Carlos Cesar Amorim & Gilson Brito Alves Lima & Ma, 2020. "Multi-Criteria Decision Method for Sustainable Watercourse Management in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15737-:d:984668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.