IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15449-d979272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Regulatory Strategy of Third-Party Environmental Pollution Management

Author

Listed:
  • Guolong Wei

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Guoliang Li

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650504, China)

  • Xue Sun

    (School of Teacher Education, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China)

Abstract

The “multiple-interaction” model of third-party management for environmental pollution has gradually replaced the traditional “command-and-control” model and become a new trend in governance. This new governance system is accompanied by a lack of regulatory capacity, a single reward and punishment mechanism, and frequent rent-seeking behavior, and other governance problems are becoming increasingly prominent. Based on the premise of limited rationality, considering the possible rent-seeking behavior of pollution control enterprises and professional environmental testing institutions, this paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model with pollution control enterprises, professional environmental testing institutions, and government regulatory departments as the main bodies. The evolutionary stabilization strategy of the three-party game is analyzed according to Lyapunov’s theory, and the system is optimized through a computational experimental simulation in MATLAB. The research results show that the government can effectively regulate the behavior of pollution control enterprises and professional environmental testing institutions by appropriately increasing the rewards and punishments, but excessive rewards are not conducive to increasing the government regulators’ own performance; the existing static reward and punishment mechanism of the government regulators fails to reward and punish the behavior of governance subjects in real time, and the linear dynamic punishment mechanism greatly increases the probability of rent-seeking behavior, neither of which is a stable control strategy for the system. The non-linear dynamic reward and punishment mechanism takes into account both dynamic incentives and dynamic constraints to make the system achieve the desired evolutionary stability strategy, i.e., pollution control enterprises follow regulations, professional environmental testing agencies refuse to seek rent, and the government actively regulates the system as the final evolutionary direction. The research findings and management implications provide countermeasures and suggestions for government regulators to improve the regulatory mechanism for the third-party management of environmental pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Guolong Wei & Guoliang Li & Xue Sun, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Regulatory Strategy of Third-Party Environmental Pollution Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15449-:d:979272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shijing Yang & Yikun Su & Wei Wang & Kaicheng Hua, 2019. "Research on Developers’ Green Procurement Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jolien Grandia & Dylan Voncken, 2019. "Sustainable Public Procurement: The Impact of Ability, Motivation, and Opportunity on the Implementation of Different Types of Sustainable Public Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Xingwei Li & Jiachi Dai & Xiaowen Zhu & Jingru Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Xiang Liu & Qiong Shen, 2023. "Mechanism of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the green development behavior of construction enterprises," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Xingwei Li & Jinrong He & Yicheng Huang & Jingru Li & Xiang Liu & Jiachi Dai, 2022. "Predicting the factors influencing construction enterprises’ adoption of green development behaviors using artificial neural network," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Guangmin Zhang & Yang Zhang & Wei Tian & Huimin Li & Ping Guo & Fangfang Ye, 2021. "Bridging the Intention–Behavior Gap: Effect of Altruistic Motives on Developers’ Action towards Green Redevelopment of Industrial Brownfields," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Cezar-Petre Simion & Ciprian Nicolescu & Mihai Vrîncuț, 2019. "Green Procurement in Romanian Construction Projects. A Cluster Analysis of the Barriers and Enablers to Green Procurement in Construction Projects from the Bucharest-Ilfov Region of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-25, November.
    6. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán & Mauricio Guerra-Velásquez & Elizabeth Emperatriz García-Salirrosas, 2023. "COVID-19 Effects on Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Social Impact Perspective from Latin American Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    7. John Coffie Azamela & Zhiwei Tang & Owusu Ackah & Swanzy Awozum, 2022. "Assessing the Antecedents of E-Government Adoption: A Case of the Ghanaian Public Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    8. Junling Jiang & Zhaoxin He & Changren Ke, 2023. "Construction Contractors’ Carbon Emissions Reduction Intention: A Study Based on Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Yi Gao & Gaosheng Yang & Qiuhao Xie, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Green Building Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Aftab Hameed Memon & Nafees Ahmed Memon & Ali Arsal & Tauha Hussain Ali, 2021. "Modeling the Factors Enhancing the Implementation of Green Procurement in the Pakistani Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Yong Li & Yu Sun & Chengcheng Zeng & Jinxing Li & Yanping Gao & Haisheng Li, 2022. "Research on the Influencing Factors for the Use of Green Building Materials through the Number Growth of Construction Enterprises Based on Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, October.
    12. Heather Markham Kim & In-Hye Lee & Kyuhyeon Joo & JungHoon (Jay) Lee & Jinsoo Hwang, 2022. "Psychological Benefits of Purchasing Home Meal Replacement in the Context of Eco-Friendly TV Home Shopping Broadcast: The Moderating Role of Personal Norm," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    13. Wenxi Zhu & Jing Zhang & Da Wang & Chongsen Ma & Jinfan Zhang & Pei Chen, 2023. "Study on the Critical Factors Influencing High-Quality Development of Green Buildings for Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Yang Zhang & Fangfang Ye & Guangmin Zhang, 2021. "Determinants of Green Regeneration of Industrial Brownfield under Ecological Security Constraints: Model and Empirical Analysis Based on Grounded Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Bo Wang & Chunyan Huang & Huaming Wang & Fangwei Liao, 2022. "Impact Factors in Chinese Construction Enterprises’ Carbon Emission-Reduction Intentions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Linlin Xie & Mian Huang & Bo Xia & Martin Skitmore, 2022. "Megaproject Environmentally Responsible Behavior in China: A Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Alain Balaguer-Mercado & Samuel N. Kirshner & Chung-Li Tseng, 2023. "Sustainable Supplier Selection under Financial Hardships: The Conflicting Impact of Spatial and Temporal Psychological Distances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15449-:d:979272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.