IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15367-d977204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Industry-Specific Freight Generation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Hyeonsup Lim

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Majbah Uddin

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Yuandong Liu

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Shih-Miao Chin

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

  • Ho-Ling Hwang

    (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA)

Abstract

According to Bureau of Transportation Statistics, the U.S. transportation system handled 14,329 million ton-miles of freight per day in 2020. Understanding the generation of these freight shipments is crucial for transportation researchers, planners, and policymakers to design and plan for a more efficient and connected freight transportation system. Traditionally, the freight generation modeling has been based on Ordinary Least Square (OLS) regression, although more advanced Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have been evaluated and proven to have excellent performance in various transportation applications in recent years. Furthermore, one modeling approach applied for one industry might not always be applicable for another as their freight generation logics can be quite different. The objective of this study is to apply and evaluate alternative ML algorithms in the estimation of freight generation for each of 45 industry types. Seven alternative ML algorithms, along with the base OLS regression, were evaluated and compared. In addition, the study considered different combinations of variables in both the original and logarithmic form as well as hyperparameters of those ML algorithms in the model selection for each industry type. The results showed statistically significant improvements in the root mean square error reduction by the alternative ML algorithms over the OLS for over 80% of cases. The study suggests utilizing the alternative ML algorithms can reduce the root mean square error by about 30%, depending on industry types.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyeonsup Lim & Majbah Uddin & Yuandong Liu & Shih-Miao Chin & Ho-Ling Hwang, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Industry-Specific Freight Generation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15367-:d:977204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majbah Uddin & Sabreena Anowar & Naveen Eluru, 2021. "Modeling freight mode choice using machine learning classifiers: a comparative study using Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) data," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(5), pages 543-559, July.
    2. Krisztin, Tamás, 2018. "Semi-parametric spatial autoregressive models in freight generation modeling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 121-143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamás Krisztin & Philipp Piribauer, 2021. "A Bayesian spatial autoregressive logit model with an empirical application to European regional FDI flows," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 231-257, July.
    2. Diana P. Moreno-Palacio & Carlos A. Gonzalez-Calderon & Héctor López-Ospina & Jhan Kevin Gil-Marin & John Jairo Posada-Henao, 2024. "Freight tour synthesis based on entropy maximization with fuzzy logic constraints," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2323-2357, December.
    3. Middela, Mounisai Siddartha & Ramadurai, Gitakrishnan, 2024. "Effect of the measurement period and spatial dependence on the accuracy of urban freight trip generation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    4. Sahu, Prasanta K. & Qureshi, Danish & Pani, Agnivesh, 2022. "Examining commercial vehicle fleet ownership decisions and the mediating role of freight generation: A structural equation modeling assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 26-33.
    5. Zhenbao Wang & Shuyue Liu & Haitao Lian & Xinyi Chen, 2024. "Investigating the Nonlinear Effect of Land Use and Built Environment on Public Transportation Choice Using a Machine Learning Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Dhulipala, Sowjanya & Patil, Gopal R., 2020. "Freight production of agricultural commodities in India using multiple linear regression and generalized additive modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 245-258.
    7. Mounisai Siddartha Middela & Gitakrishnan Ramadurai, 2021. "Incorporating spatial interactions in zero-inflated negative binomial models for freight trip generation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2335-2356, October.
    8. Sowjanya Dhulipala & Gopal R. Patil, 2023. "Regional freight generation and spatial interactions in developing regions using secondary data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 773-810, June.
    9. Gonzalez-Calderon, Carlos A. & Moreno-Palacio, Diana Patricia & Posada-Henao, John Jairo & Quintero-Giraldo, Ricardo & Múnera, César Chavarría, 2022. "Service trip generation modeling in urban areas," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Zhiyong Chen & Jianbao Chen, 2022. "Bayesian analysis of partially linear, single-index, spatial autoregressive models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 327-353, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15367-:d:977204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.