IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15279-d975894.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Optimal Location Selection and Semi-Finished Product Inventory Allocation in the Steel Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiming Shi

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Yisong Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Gábor Bohács

    (Department of Material Handling and Logistic Systems, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Qiang Zhou

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China)

Abstract

With the development of industrial production technologies and market economy, Postponement is increasingly being adopted by continuous production enterprise as a method that enables multi-product, mass customization production. In order to make use of the Postponement in manufacturing production enterprises need to achieve customized production and reduce enterprise costs. A modeling is conducted in the production process of Postponement in iron and steel enterprises in this paper. With the goal of minimizing total costs on a specific customer service level, mixed integer nonlinear programming and particle swarm algorithms are adopted for modeling and solving, to determine the optimal location and optimal semi-finished product inventory of PDP and CODP. Finally, taking an iron and steel enterprise as an example, the feasibility and effectiveness of the model and algorithm are verified. The study shows that the change of the optimal locations of PDP and CODP is affected by the change of customer service level and delay penalty coefficient, but the speed of change of the optimal location of PDP shows longer delays. In addition, the size of the capacity of semi-finished product inventory corresponding to CODP has a direct influence on whether the semi-finished product inventory corresponding to PDP participates in production, which in turn affects the optimal semi-finished product inventory on all levels. Through the analysis, it is found that the model constructed in this paper can better describe the overall situation and the influence relationship of the Postponement, and the study supplements the deficiency of the research on Postponement in the continuous manufacturing enterprises and enriches the content of the quantitative research on the Postponement.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiming Shi & Yisong Li & Gábor Bohács & Qiang Zhou, 2022. "A Study on Optimal Location Selection and Semi-Finished Product Inventory Allocation in the Steel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15279-:d:975894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15279/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15279/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hsu, Hsi-Mei & Wang, Wen-Pai, 2004. "Dynamic programming for delayed product differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 183-193, July.
    2. Brian Denton & Diwakar Gupta & Keith Jawahir, 2003. "Managing Increasing Product Variety at Integrated Steel Mills," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 41-53, April.
    3. van Donk, Dirk Pieter, 2001. "Make to stock or make to order: The decoupling point in the food processing industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 297-306, February.
    4. Jeong, In-Jae, 2011. "A dynamic model for the optimization of decoupling point and production planning in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 561-567, June.
    5. Jewkes, Elizabeth M. & Alfa, Attahiru S., 2009. "A queueing model of delayed product differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(3), pages 734-743, December.
    6. Sun, X.Y. & Ji, P. & Sun, L.Y. & Wang, Y.L., 2008. "Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 943-956, June.
    7. Daniel Ramón-Lumbierres & F. Javier Heredia Cervera & Joaquim Minguella-Canela & Asier Muguruza-Blanco, 2021. "Optimal postponement in supply chain network design under uncertainty: an application for additive manufacturing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(17), pages 5198-5215, September.
    8. Violetta Giada Cannas & Margherita Pero & Tommaso Rossi & Jonathan Gosling, 2018. "Integrate Customer Order Decoupling Point and Mass Customisation Concepts: A Literature Review," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Stephan Hankammer & Kjeld Nielsen & Frank T. Piller & Günther Schuh & Ning Wang (ed.), Customization 4.0, pages 495-517, Springer.
    9. Desheng Xu & Encui Liu & Wei Duan & Ke Yang, 2022. "Consumption-Driven Carbon Emission Reduction Path and Simulation Research in Steel Industry: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Karine Araújo Ferreira & Larissa Almeida Flávio & Lasara Fabrícia Rodrigues, 2018. "Postponement: bibliometric analysis and systematic review of the literature," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 69-94.
    11. Coelho, Leandro dos Santos, 2009. "An efficient particle swarm approach for mixed-integer programming in reliability–redundancy optimization applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 830-837.
    12. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    13. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 1997. "Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 40-53, January.
    14. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Dusan Sormaz & Gary Weckman, 2016. "Multiple customer order decoupling points within a hybrid MTS/MTO manufacturing supply chain with uncertain demands in two consecutive echelons," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 976-997, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Dusan Sormaz & Gary Weckman, 2016. "Multiple customer order decoupling points within a hybrid MTS/MTO manufacturing supply chain with uncertain demands in two consecutive echelons," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 976-997, December.
    2. Wikner, Joakim & Naim, Mohamed M. & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Lin, Junyi, 2017. "IOBPCS based models and decoupling thinking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 153-166.
    3. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Sharda, Bikram & Akiya, Naoko, 2012. "Selecting make-to-stock and postponement policies for different products in a chemical plant: A case study using discrete event simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 161-171.
    5. Saghiri, Soroosh S. & Barnes, Stuart J., 2016. "Supplier flexibility and postponement implementation: An empirical analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 170-183.
    6. Song, Zhe & Kusiak, Andrew, 2010. "Mining Pareto-optimal modules for delayed product differentiation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 123-128, February.
    7. Kerkkanen, Annastiina, 2007. "Determining semi-finished products to be stocked when changing the MTS-MTO policy: Case of a steel mill," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 111-118, July.
    8. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2009. "Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 319-334, June.
    9. Ngniatedema, Thomas & Fono, Louis Aimé & Mbondo, Georges Dieudonné, 2015. "A delayed product customization cost model with supplier delivery performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 109-119.
    10. Fernandes, Nuno O. & Silva, Cristóvão & Carmo-Silva, S., 2015. "Order release in the hybrid MTO–FTO production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 513-520.
    11. Wu, Jun & Du, Gang & Jiao, Roger J., 2021. "Optimal postponement contracting decisions in crowdsourced manufacturing: A three-level game-theoretic model for product family architecting considering subcontracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 722-737.
    12. Liu, Weihua & Liang, Zhicheng & Ye, Zi & Liu, Liang, 2016. "The optimal decision of customer order decoupling point for order insertion scheduling in logistics service supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 50-60.
    13. Graman, Gregory A., 2010. "A partial-postponement decision cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 34-44, February.
    14. Sun, X.Y. & Ji, P. & Sun, L.Y. & Wang, Y.L., 2008. "Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 943-956, June.
    15. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Ehsan Ardjmand & Gary Weckman, 2017. "Integrated decision making model for pricing and locating the customer order decoupling point of a newsvendor supply chain," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(2), pages 417-439, June.
    16. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2019. "Engineering and production decoupling configurations: An empirical study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 173-189.
    17. Shouyao Xiong & Yuanyuan Feng & Kai Huang, 2020. "Optimal MTS and MTO Hybrid Production System for a Single Product Under the Cap-And-Trade Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Weskamp, Christoph & Koberstein, Achim & Schwartz, Frank & Suhl, Leena & Voß, Stefan, 2019. "A two-stage stochastic programming approach for identifying optimal postponement strategies in supply chains with uncertain demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 123-138.
    19. Latifa Benhamou & Pierre Féniès & Vincent Giard, 2020. "Avantages Potentiels Du Reverse Blending Sur La Chaine Logistique De L'Industrie Des Engrais," Post-Print hal-03005688, HAL.
    20. Dirk Briskorn & Philipp Zeise, 2019. "A cyclic production scheme for the synchronized and integrated two-level lot-sizing and scheduling problem with no-wait restrictions and stochastic demand," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(4), pages 895-942, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15279-:d:975894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.