IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15163-d973900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Auditing in Rural Areas: Current Patterns and Future Challenges in Central Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Sandro Brunelli

    (Department of Management and Law, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy)

  • Anel Murzakhmetova

    (Department of Management and Law, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Roma, Italy)

  • Camilla Falivena

    (CERGAS–SDA Bocconi School of Management, Government Health and Non for Profit Division, 20136 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

Environmental audit (EA) is a systematic process of collecting and objectively evaluating information, whether certain environmental activities are in compliance with audit standards, criteria, and control systems. Due to the former use of the Soviet Union regime, Central Asia, with vast resources and a growing population, is still confronting a number of environmental issues. The increasing number of businesses in Central Asian countries has an impact on the local environment and the population’s health. As a response, EA is one of the instruments that businesses may use to improve their environmental performance, protect nature, and ensure public-health safety. This paper, after providing a scoping review concerning the academic literature, investigates, by using secondary data, the current trends and challenges in practical application of EAs in five Central Asian countries. Our findings point out a list of shortcomings in applying the EA tools in Central Asia, which mainly derive from implementation, legislative, and resource gaps. Thus, the road towards a concrete implementation of EA is still far from being achieved. The study ends with some pieces of advice for EA policy makers and opens up avenues for future research, which can also be applied outside Central Asia.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandro Brunelli & Anel Murzakhmetova & Camilla Falivena, 2022. "Environmental Auditing in Rural Areas: Current Patterns and Future Challenges in Central Asia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15163-:d:973900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15163/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15163/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Margaret Lightbody, 2000. "Environmental auditing: the audit theory gap," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 151-169, June.
    2. Fatma Baalouch & Salma Damak Ayadi & Khaled Hussainey, 2019. "A study of the determinants of environmental disclosure quality: evidence from French listed companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(4), pages 939-971, December.
    3. Power, Michael, 1997. "Expertise and the construction of relevance: Accountants and environmental audit," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 123-146, February.
    4. Guohua Qu & Yue Zhang & Kaichao Tan & Jiangtao Han & Weihua Qu, 2022. "Exploring Knowledge Domain and Emerging Trends in Climate Change and Environmental Audit: A Scientometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2008. "Factors influencing the quality of corporate environmental disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(2), pages 120-136, February.
    6. Dasgupta, Susmita & Hettige, Hemamala & Wheeler, David, 2000. "What Improves Environmental Compliance? Evidence from Mexican Industry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 39-66, January.
    7. Robert Dixon & Gehan A. Mousa & Anne D. Woodhead, 2004. "The necessary characteristics of environmental auditors: a review of the contribution of the financial auditing profession," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 119-138, June.
    8. Alin Ionel Ienciu & Vasile Daniel Cardos & Victor Octavian Muller, 2010. "Instruments That Are Needed To Ensure The Credibility Of Environmental Dislcosure," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 522-527, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muthyaah Mohd Jamil & Siti Nur Balqis Kassim. & Nur Anis Syuhadah Mohamad Radzi. & Nur Kamilia Zuraini. & Sofia Adlina Roslan., 2024. "The Internal Auditors in Catalyst for Sustainability Performance through Environmental Audit," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 1141-1147, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md Ali Arshad Chowdhury & Mohammad Morshedur Rahman & Mouri Dey & Syed Moudud-Ul-Huq & Sk Alamgir Hossain, 2023. "Perceived Pressures and Motivations for Environmental Disclosures: Role of Certification," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Ans Kolk & Paolo Perego, 2010. "Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: an international investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(3), pages 182-198, March.
    3. Amir Michael & Rob Dixon, 2019. "Audit data analytics of unregulated voluntary disclosures and auditing expectations gap," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(4), pages 188-205, December.
    4. Candy Lim Chiu & Jingxin Zhang & Mingrui Li & Siyu Wei & Shengnan Xu & Xiaotong Chai, 2020. "A study of environmental disclosures practices in Chinese energy industry," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Nicolae Todea & Ionela Cornelia Stanciu & Ana Maria JoldoÅŸ (Udrea), 2011. "Environmental Audit, A Possible Source Of Information For Financial Auditors," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(13), pages 1-7.
    6. Riccardo Santamaria & Francesco Paolone & Nicola Cucari & Luca Dezi, 2021. "Non‐financial strategy disclosure and environmental, social and governance score: Insight from a configurational approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1993-2007, May.
    7. Lise Tole & Gary Koop, 2013. "Estimating the impact on efficiency of the adoption of a voluntary environmental standard: an empirical study of the global copper mining industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 35-45, February.
    8. Claudia Arena & Saverio Bozzolan & Claudia Imperatore, 2024. "Enhancing environmental reporting: A study on the role of narrative disclosure, firm‐ and country‐level incentives," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3414-3428, July.
    9. Li, Qiang & Wang, Shengying & He, Zichun & Li, Hanqiao & Xiang, Erwei, 2023. "Does stock market index adjustment affect environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    10. Macdonald, Kevin & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2021. "Education Quality, Green Technology, and the Economic Impact of Carbon Pricing," IZA Discussion Papers 14792, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    12. Kube, Roland & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Löschel, Andreas & Massier, Philipp, 2019. "Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(S1).
    13. Patrycja Hąbek & Radosław Wolniak, 2016. "Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: the case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 399-420, January.
    14. Riccardo Torelli & Federica Balluchi & Katia Furlotti, 2020. "The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 470-484, March.
    15. Trang Cam Hoang & Indra Abeysekera & Shiguang Ma, 2018. "Board Diversity and Corporate Social Disclosure: Evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 833-852, September.
    16. Ishmael Tingbani & Lyton Chithambo & Venancio Tauringana & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2020. "Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2194-2210, September.
    17. Souhir Khemir, 2010. "Analyse Des Déterminants De La Divulgation Sociétale Dans Les Rapports Annuels Des Entreprises Tunisiennes Cotées," Post-Print hal-00479515, HAL.
    18. Carole Billiet & Sandra Rousseau, 2014. "How real is the threat of imprisonment for environmental crime?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 183-198, April.
    19. Salina P. Siddique & Nick Sciulli, 2018. "Sustainable development of small companies: Investors' perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1258-1271, December.
    20. Namrata Malhotra & Timothy Morris, 2009. "Heterogeneity in Professional Service Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 895-922, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15163-:d:973900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.