IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14638-d965862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and Environmental Evaluation of a Single-Story Steel Building in Its Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Vela

    (Business Integration Partners S.p.A., 20122 Milan, Italy)

  • Chiara Calderini

    (Department of Civil, Chemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Genoa, 16145 Genoa, Italy)

  • Paolo Rosasco

    (Department Architecture and Design, University of Genoa, 16123 Genoa, Italy)

  • Carlo Strazza

    (Golder Associates S.r.l, Via Antonio Banfo 43, 10155 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

In this study, the possibility of applying the Life Cycle Thinking approach to structural design, considering all aspects and phases of the structure’s life, is investigated. The idea is to develop a procedure for the analysis of the economic and environmental impacts of structures in their life cycle, including not only ordinary costs along life cycle phases but also the extraordinary costs resulting from damage and anticipated end-of-life caused by unexpected natural hazards. The building performance under extraordinary conditions is calculated according to a time-based Loss Assessment Analysis. Such analysis provides the probable performance of a building and its components over a given period of time, considering all the hazardous events that can occur in that period, the probability of occurrence of each event, and the related effects. The outlined approach is applied to a case study of a single-story steel office building located in Italy. Two LC scenarios, having a duration of 2 years and 50 years, are considered. Results show that contributions of environmental impacts and benefits related to end-of-life management and economic losses for natural hazards are significant and not negligible. It is highlighted that the greatest challenge faced when using such a comprehensive approach is represented by data availability and representativeness that deeply limits the possibility of its implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Vela & Chiara Calderini & Paolo Rosasco & Carlo Strazza, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Evaluation of a Single-Story Steel Building in Its Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14638-:d:965862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14638/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14638/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turner, David A. & Williams, Ian D. & Kemp, Simon, 2015. "Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 186-197.
    2. Katia Perini & Fabio Magrassi & Andrea Giachetta & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo & Adriana Del Borghi, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Building Retrofit through Vertical Greening Systems: A Life-Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, April.
    3. Adriana Del Borghi & Thomas Spiegelhalter & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo, 2021. "Carbon-Neutral-Campus Building: Design Versus Retrofitting of Two University Zero Energy Buildings in Europe and in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Rosengart & Maja Granzotto & Rudi Wierer & Gianluca Pazzaglia & Alessandro Salvi & Giovanni Dotelli, 2023. "The Green Value Engineering Methodology: A Sustainability-Driven Project Management Tool for Capital Projects in Process Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Jasmina Locke & Jacinta Dsilva & Saniya Zarmukhambetova, 2023. "Decarbonization Strategies in the UAE Built Environment: An Evidence-Based Analysis Using COP26 and COP27 Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adriana Del Borghi & Thomas Spiegelhalter & Luca Moreschi & Michela Gallo, 2021. "Carbon-Neutral-Campus Building: Design Versus Retrofitting of Two University Zero Energy Buildings in Europe and in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Harshwardhan Ketkale & Steven Simske, 2023. "Demographic Considerations in Incenting Reuse of Corrugated Cardboard Boxes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-23, July.
    3. Sheng-Yuan Wang & Kyung-Tae Lee & Ju-Hyung Kim, 2022. "Green Retrofitting Simulation for Sustainable Commercial Buildings in China Using a Proposed Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Yann Mey Yee & Lilian Sy & Kryzia Lomibao & Josephine Dela Cruz German & Hui-Ming Wee, 2023. "Sustainable Economic Production Quantity Model Considering Greenhouse Gas and Wastewater Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, February.
    5. Rebekka Volk & Christoph Stallkamp & Justus J. Steins & Savina Padumane Yogish & Richard C. Müller & Dieter Stapf & Frank Schultmann, 2021. "Techno‐economic assessment and comparison of different plastic recycling pathways: A German case study," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1318-1337, October.
    6. Yunisa Zahrah & Jeongsoo Yu & Xiaoyue Liu, 2024. "How Indonesia’s Cities Are Grappling with Plastic Waste: An Integrated Approach towards Sustainable Plastic Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-32, May.
    7. Anton Orlov & Elena Klyuchnikova & Anna Korppoo, 2021. "Economic and Environmental Benefits from Municipal Solid Waste Recycling in the Murmansk Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-10, September.
    8. Ozge Ogut & Nerantzia Julia Tzortzi & Chiara Bertolin, 2022. "Vertical Green Structures to Establish Sustainable Built Environment: A Systematic Market Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-36, September.
    9. C. Genta & S. Favaro & G. Sonetti & G. V. Fracastoro & P. Lombardi, 2022. "Quantitative assessment of environmental impacts at the urban scale: the ecological footprint of a university campus," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5826-5845, April.
    10. Emillo Byrd & Benjamin Netzel & David Brent Adams & Hao Zhang, 2021. "Life cycle GHG assessment of magnetic bearing and oil lubricated bearing water cooled chillers," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(5), pages 1222-1235, October.
    11. Razzaq, Asif & Sharif, Arshian & Afshan, Sahar & Li, Claire J., 2023. "Do climate technologies and recycling asymmetrically mitigate consumption-based carbon emissions in the United States? New insights from Quantile ARDL," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    12. Lingyu Wang & Xingyun Yan & Mingzhu Fang & Hua Song & Jie Hu, 2023. "A Systematic Design Framework for Zero Carbon Campuses: Investigating the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Fahua Campus Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-31, May.
    13. Lausselet, Carine & Cherubini, Francesco & Oreggioni, Gabriel David & del Alamo Serrano, Gonzalo & Becidan, Michael & Hu, Xiangping & Rørstad, Per Kr. & Strømman, Anders Hammer, 2017. "Norwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storage," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 50-61.
    14. Jutta Hollands & Azra Korjenic, 2021. "Evaluation and Planning Decision on Façade Greening Made Easy—Integration in BIM and Implementation of an Automated Design Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-29, August.
    15. Choi, Taelim, 2017. "Environmental impact of voluntary extended producer responsibility: The case of carpet recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 76-84.
    16. Cherdsak Suksiripattanapong & Taweerat Phetprapai & Witawat Singsang & Chayakrit Phetchuay & Jaksada Thumrongvut & Wisitsak Tabyang, 2022. "Utilization of Recycled Plastic Waste in Fiber Reinforced Concrete for Eco-Friendly Footpath and Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, June.
    17. Jihaoming Zou & Zhen Zhang, 2022. "Analysis of Main Factors on Evaluation and Selection of Wet Waste Disposal Modes: A Case Study of Universities in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-27, April.
    18. Rowe, T. & Poppe, J. & Buyle, M. & Belmans, B. & Audenaert, A., 2022. "Is the sustainability potential of vertical greening systems deeply rooted? Establishing uniform outlines for environmental impact assessment of VGS," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Bilal Boubellouta & Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, 2023. "Driving factors of e-waste recycling rate in 30 European countries: new evidence using a panel quantile regression of the EKC hypothesis coupled with the STIRPAT model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7533-7560, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14638-:d:965862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.