IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14222-d959010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation and Response to Climate Change Based on Remote Sensing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yingchang Li

    (School of History and Culture, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Mingyang Li

    (College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Yuehui Wang

    (Department of Engineering Foundation, Army Academy of Border and Coastal Defence, Xi’an 710108, China)

Abstract

As the largest and most important natural terrestrial ecosystem, forest plays a crucial role in reducing the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, mitigating global warming, maintaining the global ecological balance, and promoting global biological evolution and community succession. The accurate and rapid assessment of forest biomass is highly significant for estimating the regional carbon budget and monitoring forest change. In this study, Landsat images and China’s National Forest Continuous Inventory data of 1999, 2004, 2009, and 2014 were used to establish extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models for forest aboveground biomass (AGB) estimation based on forest type in the Xiangjiang River Basin, Hunan Province, China. Kriging interpolation of the AGB residuals was used to correct the error of AGB estimation. Then, a new XGBoost model was established using the final corrected AGB maps and climate data to estimate the AGB under different climate scenarios during the 2050s and 2070s. The results indicated that AGB estimation using the XGBoost model with correction via Kriging interpolation of the AGB residuals can significantly improve the accuracy of AGB estimation. The total AGB of the study area increased over time from 1999 to 2014, indicating that the forest quality improved in the study area. Under the different climate scenarios, the total AGB during the 2050s and 2070s was predicted to decline continuously with increasing of greenhouse gas emissions, indicating that greenhouse gas emissions have a negative impact on forest growth. The results of this study can provide data support for evaluating the ecological function and value of forest ecosystems, and for formulating reasonable forest management measures to mitigate the effects of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingchang Li & Mingyang Li & Yuehui Wang, 2022. "Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation and Response to Climate Change Based on Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14222-:d:959010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. A. Vaganov & M. K. Hughes & A. V. Kirdyanov & F. H. Schweingruber & P. P. Silkin, 1999. "Influence of snowfall and melt timing on tree growth in subarctic Eurasia," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6740), pages 149-151, July.
    2. Chris D. Thomas & Alison Cameron & Rhys E. Green & Michel Bakkenes & Linda J. Beaumont & Yvonne C. Collingham & Barend F. N. Erasmus & Marinez Ferreira de Siqueira & Alan Grainger & Lee Hannah & Lesle, 2004. "Extinction risk from climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 427(6970), pages 145-148, January.
    3. Leonel J.R. Nunes & Catarina I.R. Meireles & Carlos J. Pinto Gomes & Nuno M.C. Almeida Ribeiro, 2019. "Forest Management and Climate Change Mitigation: A Review on Carbon Cycle Flow Models for the Sustainability of Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Acharya, Ram Prasad & Maraseni, Tek & Cockfield, Geoff, 2019. "Global trend of forest ecosystem services valuation – An analysis of publications," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Camille Parmesan & Gary Yohe, 2003. "A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6918), pages 37-42, January.
    6. Belinda E. Medlyn & Remko A. Duursma & Melanie J. B. Zeppel, 2011. "Forest productivity under climate change: a checklist for evaluating model studies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 332-355, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brandt, Laura A. & Benscoter, Allison M. & Harvey, Rebecca & Speroterra, Carolina & Bucklin, David & Romañach, Stephanie S. & Watling, James I. & Mazzotti, Frank J., 2017. "Comparison of climate envelope models developed using expert-selected variables versus statistical selection," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 345(C), pages 10-20.
    2. Rougier, Thibaud & Drouineau, Hilaire & Dumoulin, Nicolas & Faure, Thierry & Deffuant, Guillaume & Rochard, Eric & Lambert, Patrick, 2014. "The GR3D model, a tool to explore the Global Repositioning Dynamics of Diadromous fish Distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 283(C), pages 31-44.
    3. Marco-Fondevila, Miguel & Álvarez-Etxeberría, Igor, 2023. "Trends in private sector engagement with biodiversity: EU listed companies' disclosure and indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Sara J. Germain & James A. Lutz, 2020. "Climate extremes may be more important than climate means when predicting species range shifts," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 579-598, November.
    5. Jahan Zeb Khan & Muhammad Zaheer, 2018. "Impacts Of Environmental Changeability And Human Activities On Hydrological Processes And Response ," Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(1), pages 13-17, June.
    6. Thurner, Stephanie D & Converse, Sarah J & Branch, Trevor A, 2021. "Modeling opportunistic exploitation: increased extinction risk when targeting more than one species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    7. Víctor Rincón & Javier Velázquez & Derya Gülçin & Aida López-Sánchez & Carlos Jiménez & Ali Uğur Özcan & Juan Carlos López-Almansa & Tomás Santamaría & Daniel Sánchez-Mata & Kerim Çiçek, 2023. "Mapping Priority Areas for Connectivity of Yellow-Winged Darter ( Sympetrum flaveolum , Linnaeus 1758) under Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-39, January.
    8. Dudley, Peter N. & Bonazza, Riccardo & Porter, Warren P., 2016. "Climate change impacts on nesting and internesting leatherback sea turtles using 3D animated computational fluid dynamics and finite volume heat transfer," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 231-240.
    9. Antoine Sambou & Shenggao Cheng & Lei Huang & Charles Nounagnon Gangnibo, 2010. "Jiufeng Protected Area Biodiversity Threats Assessment," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(3), pages 108-108, August.
    10. Brooks, Wesley R. & Newbold, Stephen C., 2014. "An updated biodiversity nonuse value function for use in climate change integrated assessment models," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 342-349.
    11. Drielsma, Michael J. & Love, Jamie & Williams, Kristen J. & Manion, Glenn & Saremi, Hanieh & Harwood, Tom & Robb, Janeen, 2017. "Bridging the gap between climate science and regional-scale biodiversity conservation in south-eastern Australia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 360(C), pages 343-362.
    12. Lei Zhang & Zhinong Jing & Zuyao Li & Yang Liu & Shengzuo Fang, 2019. "Predictive Modeling of Suitable Habitats for Cinnamomum Camphora (L.) Presl Using Maxent Model under Climate Change in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Yuncheng Zhao & Mingyue Zhao & Lei Zhang & Chunyi Wang & Yinlong Xu, 2021. "Predicting Possible Distribution of Tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) under Climate Change Scenarios Using MaxEnt Model in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Loehle, Craig, 2018. "Disequilibrium and relaxation times for species responses to climate change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 23-29.
    15. Chuansheng Wang & Guiyan Sun & Lijuan Dang, 2015. "Identifying Ecological Red Lines: A Case Study of the Coast in Liaoning Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Dubravka Milić & Snežana Radenković & Dimitrije Radišić & Andrijana Andrić & Tijana Nikolić & Ante Vujić, 2019. "Stability and changes in the distribution of Pipiza hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Europe under projected future climate conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    17. Denis Réale & Mahdi Khelfaoui & Pierre-Olivier Montiglio & Yves Gingras, 2020. "Mapping the dynamics of research networks in ecology and evolution using co-citation analysis (1975–2014)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1361-1385, March.
    18. Dragomir, Lucian & Dragomir, Robert, 2019. "Climate Change And Its Interaction With Natural, Economic And Social Processes," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 19(2), pages 125-138.
    19. Ko, Chia-Ying & Root, Terry L. & Lee, Pei-Fen, 2011. "Movement distances enhance validity of predictive models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 947-954.
    20. Reed Noss, 2011. "Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Florida’s unenviable position with respect to sea level rise," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14222-:d:959010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.