IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13867-d952918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Law Enforcement Performance of Forest Stations at Pu Hu Nature Reserve, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Le Khac

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla Univerisity, Hat Yai 90100, Thailand
    Thanh Hoa Agriculture and Rural Development, Thanh Hoa 440000, Vietnam)

  • Ao Xuan Hoa

    (Faculty of Economics, Tay Nguyen University, Buon Ma Thuoc 630000, Vietnam)

  • Nha Thi Huynh Nguyen

    (Faculty of Finance-Banking and Business Administration, Quy Nhon University, Quy Nhon 55113, Vietnam)

  • Hue Ha Thi Thu

    (Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 10000, Vietnam)

  • Kuaanan Techato

    (Faculty of Environmental Management, Prince of Songkla Univerisity, Hat Yai 90100, Thailand)

Abstract

In Vietnam, most protected areas are guarded and their natural resources are conserved by forest rangers, who carry out their law enforcement duties from forest stations. Previous research projects have been undertaken on law enforcement performance during traditional patrolling in most protected areas; however, insights into patrolling efforts at the local level, as a part of protection activities, have been significantly missing. The aim of this paper was to compare the law enforcement performance of rangers at two forest stations in the Pu Hu Nature Reserve (NR). These forest rangers face different challenges and illegal activities, depending on local conditions, which means that their law enforcement activities can vary widely. The results provided initial insights into the different variables of law enforcement performance and illegal encounters at the local level. The number of illegal encounters and distance walked were not significantly different between the two forest stations, unlike other variables, such as relative altitude, walking speed, and patrol hours. The ratios of illegal encounters to relative altitude and to speed at the Nam Tien Forest Station were higher than the equivalent findings at the Trung Thanh Forest Station due to differences in terms of the patrolling hours and distance walked between the two forest stations. Action to improve conservation is essentially a matter of implementing conservation planning in parallel with the current situation. Undoubtedly, the successful management of forests by stations in a protected area will be indicated by a positive law enforcement performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Le Khac & Ao Xuan Hoa & Nha Thi Huynh Nguyen & Hue Ha Thi Thu & Kuaanan Techato, 2022. "Comparing Law Enforcement Performance of Forest Stations at Pu Hu Nature Reserve, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13867-:d:952918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunderlin, William D. & Angelsen, Arild & Belcher, Brian & Burgers, Paul & Nasi, Robert & Santoso, Levania & Wunder, Sven, 2005. "Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An Overview," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1383-1402, September.
    2. Dong Le Khac & Ao Xuan Hoa & Luyen Nguyen Tai & Nha Thi Huynh Nguyen & Kuaanan Techato, 2021. "Monitoring of Field Patrolling Efforts, Vietnam: Insights from a Forest Station in Pu Hu Nature Reserve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    2. Rakotonarivo, O. Sarobidy & Bredahl Jacobsen, Jette & Poudyal, Mahesh & Rasoamanana, Alexandra & Hockley, Neal, 2018. "Estimating welfare impacts where property rights are contested: methodological and policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 71-83.
    3. Veronesi, Marcella & Reutemann, Tim & Zabel, Astrid & Engel, Stefanie, 2015. "Designing REDD+ schemes when forest users are not forest landowners: Evidence from a survey-based experiment in Kenya," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 46-57.
    4. Sunderlin, William D. & Dewi, Sonya & Puntodewo, Atie & Müller, Daniel & Angelsen, Arild & Epprecht, Michael, 2008. "Why forests are important for global poverty alleviation: A spatial explanation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2).
    5. Gordon Kofi Sarfo-Adu, 2021. "Forest Tenure and Sustainable Forest Management: Drawing Lessons from the Literature," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Sims, Katharine R.E., 2010. "Conservation and development: Evidence from Thai protected areas," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 94-114, September.
    7. Chervier, Colas & Le Velly, Gwenolé & Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss, 2019. "When the Implementation of Payments for Biodiversity Conservation Leads to Motivation Crowding-out: A Case Study From the Cardamoms Forests, Cambodia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 499-510.
    8. Mina Baliamoune-Lutz, 2017. "Trade and Environmental Quality in African Countries: Do Institutions Matter?," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 43(1), pages 155-172, January.
    9. Porro, Roberto & Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro & Vela-Alvarado, Jorge W., 2015. "Forest use and agriculture in Ucayali, Peru: Livelihood strategies, poverty and wealth in an Amazon frontier," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 47-56.
    10. Mofya-Mukuka, Rhoda & Simoloka, Asunta, 2015. "Forest Resources for Rural Household Food and Nutrition Security: The Case of Eastern Province of Zambia," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 229598, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    11. Felkner, John S. & Lee, Hyun & Shaikh, Sabina & Kolata, Alan & Binford, Michael, 2022. "The interrelated impacts of credit access, market access and forest proximity on livelihood strategies in Cambodia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Shyamsundar, Priya & Ahlroth, Sofia & Kristjanson, Patricia & Onder, Stefanie, 2020. "Supporting pathways to prosperity in forest landscapes – A PRIME framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Cloe X. Pérez-Valladares & Ana I. Moreno-Calles & Alejandro Casas & Selene Rangel-Landa & José Blancas & Javier Caballero & Alejandro Velazquez, 2020. "Ecological, Cultural, and Geographical Implications of Brahea dulcis (Kunth) Mart. Insights for Sustainable Management in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Mohsen Mostafa & Nishtman Hatami & Kambiz Espahbodi & Farhad Asadi, 2022. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) applied to evaluating the forest management approaches," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(7), pages 263-276.
    15. López-Feldman, Alejandro, 2014. "Shocks, Income and Wealth: Do They Affect the Extraction of Natural Resources by Rural Households?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 91-100.
    16. Kemkes, Robin J., 2015. "The role of natural capital in sustaining livelihoods in remote mountainous regions: The case of Upper Svaneti, Republic of Georgia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 22-31.
    17. Wunder, Sven & Angelsen, Arild & Belcher, Brian, 2014. "Forests, Livelihoods, and Conservation: Broadening the Empirical Base," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 64(S1), pages 1-11.
    18. Begazo Curie, Karin & Mertens, Kewan & Vranken, Liesbet, 2021. "Tenure regimes and remoteness: When does forest income reduce poverty and inequality? A case study from the Peruvian Amazon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    19. Jensen, Anders, 2009. "Valuation of non-timber forest products value chains," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 34-41, January.
    20. Muhammad Zada & Syed Jamal Shah & Cao Yukun & Tariq Rauf & Naveed Khan & Syed Asad Ali Shah, 2019. "Impact of Small-to-Medium Size Forest Enterprises on Rural Livelihood: Evidence from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13867-:d:952918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.