IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13854-d952780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Low-Carbon Land Use Management Framework Based on Urban Carbon Metabolism: A Case of a Typical Coal Resource-Based City in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lingwei Li

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yongping Bai

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xuedi Yang

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Zuqiao Gao

    (College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)

  • Fuwei Qiao

    (College of Economics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jianshe Liang

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Chunyue Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

It is of great significance to study urban carbon metabolism and explore the low-carbon land use management framework from the perspective of “ecological-production-living” space, an important means for the government to strengthen spatial regulation. In the study, first of all, a carbon metabolism network model was established based on the evolution of the “ecological-production-living” space. Secondly, an ecological network analysis (ENA) method was used to identify the ecological relationships between land use types under the effect of carbon metabolism. In addition, ArcGIS software was used to visualize the spatial distribution of carbon flow and ecological relationships. Finally, a low-carbon oriented land use management framework was proposed based on the above research. Yulin, a typical coal resource-based city in China, was taken as a case study for verification. The results showed that Yulin had net carbon emissions from 2010 to 2020, indicating that the evolution of “ecological-production-living” space had a negative impact on the carbon metabolism. Industrial, mining and transportation land dominated carbon emissions, while forestland played an important role in carbon sequestration. Under the effect of carbon metabolism, a controlling and exploitative relationship was the main ecological relationship, and a mutualism relationship accounted for the smallest proportion, indicating that the urban ecological conflict was obvious in the evolution of the “ecological-production-living” space. Based on the above research, a land use management framework was proposed, which divided urban space into six types of control units. In conclusion, the results provided experience for other coal resource-based cities to promote low-carbon and sustainable land use.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingwei Li & Yongping Bai & Xuedi Yang & Zuqiao Gao & Fuwei Qiao & Jianshe Liang & Chunyue Zhang, 2022. "A Low-Carbon Land Use Management Framework Based on Urban Carbon Metabolism: A Case of a Typical Coal Resource-Based City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13854-:d:952780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13854/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13854/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Jizhe & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong, 2018. "Ecological network analysis for urban metabolism and carbon emissions based on input-output tables: A case study of Guangdong province," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 383(C), pages 118-126.
    2. Liang, Xiaoying & Min Fan, & Xiao, Yuting & Yao, Jing, 2022. "Temporal-spatial characteristics of energy-based carbon dioxide emissions and driving factors during 2004–2019, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingsong He, 2023. "Urban Planning and Sustainable Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-4, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Mohammad Aghapour Sabbaghi & Afsaneh Naeimifar, 2022. "Analysis of import substitution policy with an emphasis on environmental issues based on environmental input–output (EIO) model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 14130-14162, December.
    3. Wang, P.P. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Liu, Y.Y. & Li, Y.F., 2024. "An ecological input-output CGE model for unveiling CO2 emission metabolism under China's dual carbon goals," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    4. Zhai, Mengyu & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Zheng, Boyue & Guan, Yuru, 2020. "Inter-regional carbon flows embodied in electricity transmission: network simulation for energy-carbon nexus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Yiqun Wu & Yuan Sun & Congyue Zhou & Yonghua Li & Xuanli Wang & Huifang Yu, 2023. "Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Carbon Emissions in Mixed-Use Villages: A Sustainable Development Study of the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Zhuoxi Yu & Shan Liu & Zhichuan Zhu & Lianyan Fu, 2023. "Spatial Imbalance, Dynamic Evolution and Convergence of the Digital Economy: Analysis Based on Panel Data of 278 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Zhuoxi Yu & Shan Liu & Zhichuan Zhu, 2022. "Has the Digital Economy Reduced Carbon Emissions?: Analysis Based on Panel Data of 278 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Liu, S. & Xiao, Q., 2021. "An empirical analysis on spatial correlation investigation of industrial carbon emissions using SNA-ICE model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Xianpu Xu & Yuchen Song, 2023. "Is There a Conflict between Automation and Environment? Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Carbon Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Yali Wang & Yangyang Liu & Zijun Wang & Yan Zhang & Bo Fang & Shengnan Jiang & Yijia Yang & Zhongming Wen & Wei Zhang & Zhixin Zhang & Ziqi Lin & Peidong Han & Wenjie Yang, 2023. "Assessing the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Land Use Carbon Emissions and Multiple Driving Factors in the Guanzhong Area of Shaanxi Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Feng Dong & Guoqing Li & Yajie Liu & Qing Xu & Caixia Li, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Evolution and Cross-Industry Synergy of Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Key Industries in the City in Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-27, February.
    12. Linlin Xia & Jianfeng Wei & Ruwei Wang & Lei Chen & Yan Zhang & Zhifeng Yang, 2022. "Exploring Potential Ways to Reduce the Carbon Emission Gap in an Urban Metabolic System: A Network Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Weiping Zhang & Peiji Shi & Wanzhuang Huang, 2022. "Research on Spatial and Temporal Pattern Evolution and Driving Factors of County Carbon Emissions in Underdeveloped Regions: Gansu Province of Western China as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Huijuan Fu & Bo Li & Xiuqing Liu & Jiayi Zheng & Shanggang Yin & Haining Jiang, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Coupling Evolution of Urbanisation and Carbon Emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Jingyao Peng & Yidi Sun & Junnian Song & Wei Yang, 2020. "Exploring Potential Pathways toward Energy-Related Carbon Emission Reduction in Heavy Industrial Regions of China: An Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Li, Jizhe & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Yongping & Zhai, Mengyu & Xu, Xinli, 2021. "Projections of carbon metabolism in 2035 and implications for demand-side controls under various scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    17. Galychyn, Oleksandr, 2022. "Towards sustainable cities: A multi-criteria assessment framework for studying urban metabolism," MPRA Paper 121584, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 May 2022.
    18. Chuang Tu & Xianzhong Mu & Yufeng Wu & Yifan Gu & Guangwen Hu, 2022. "Heterogenous impacts of components in urban energy metabolism: evidences from gravity model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10089-10117, August.
    19. Shaoqi Sun & Yuanli Xie & Yunmei Li & Kansheng Yuan & Lifa Hu, 2022. "Analysis of Dynamic Evolution and Spatial-Temporal Heterogeneity of Carbon Emissions at County Level along “The Belt and Road”—A Case Study of Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Di Zhang & Xiao Dong, 2023. "From the Perspectives of Pollution Governance and Public Health: A Research of China’s Fiscal Expenditure on Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13854-:d:952780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.