IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i20p13023-d939672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Adaptive Traffic-Calming Measure and Effectiveness Evaluation in a Large Urban Complex of Shanghai, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jindong Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Frontiers Science Center for Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Tongji University, Shanghai 201210, China
    Shanghai Jinqiao (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China)

  • Jianguo Ying

    (Shanghai Jinqiao (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201206, China)

  • Shengchuan Jiang

    (Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
    Frontiers Science Center for Intelligent Autonomous Systems, Tongji University, Shanghai 201210, China)

Abstract

The rapid development of the motor vehicle brings convenience to our life; however, it also increases the burden on traffic networks and the environment, especially when road space is limited. Traffic calming has proved to be an effective solution for the improvement of traffic safety and travel quality. However, most traffic-calming measures are investigated and carried out without any adaptive ability. Such measures cannot adapt to changing traffic requirements. There is a mismatch between static measures and dynamic traffic. In this study, we propose an adaptive traffic-calming measure using deep reinforcement learning. Traffic volume is controlled at intersections according to the state of dynamic traffic. Then, we take a large urban complex (the Jinding nine-rectangle-grid area) in Shanghai, China, as an example. Further, based on applied static traffic-calming measures, we consider the characteristics of the nine plots, along with traffic demand, to design traffic-calming measures. Finally, the effectiveness of the measures is evaluated in SUMO (Simulation of Urban Mobility). The experimental results show that the proposed measure can increase driving speed under the speed limit and reduce traffic volume in a peak period. The results indicate that the proposed measure is an effective and novel solution for traffic calming in the large urban complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Jindong Wang & Jianguo Ying & Shengchuan Jiang, 2022. "An Adaptive Traffic-Calming Measure and Effectiveness Evaluation in a Large Urban Complex of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-10, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13023-:d:939672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13023/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13023/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi, 2022. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Traffic Calming Measures by SPEIR Methodology: Framework and Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Heriberto Pérez-Acebo & Robert Ziolkowski & Hernán Gonzalo-Orden, 2021. "Evaluation of the Radar Speed Cameras and Panels Indicating the Vehicles’ Speed as Traffic Calming Measures (TCM) in Short Length Urban Areas Located along Rural Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    3. De Borger, Bruno & Proost, Stef, 2021. "Road tolls, diverted traffic and local traffic calming measures: Who should be in charge?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 92-115.
    4. Monica Menendez & Lukas Ambühl, 2022. "Implementing Design and Operational Measures for Sustainable Mobility: Lessons from Zurich," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Nadafianshahamabadi, Razieh & Tayarani, Mohammad & Rowangould, Gregory, 2021. "A closer look at urban development under the emergence of autonomous vehicles: Traffic, land use and air quality impacts," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    6. Jan Paszkowski & Marcus Herrmann & Matthias Richter & Andrzej Szarata, 2021. "Modelling the Effects of Traffic-Calming Introduction to Volume–Delay Functions and Traffic Assignment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Luisa Tumminello & Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà & Tullio Giuffrè, 2023. "Evaluating Traffic-Calming-Based Urban Road Design Solutions Featuring Cooperative Driving Technologies in Energy Efficiency Transition for Smart Cities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Cantisani & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Paola Di Mascio & Laura Moretti, 2023. "Eight Traffic Calming “Easy Pieces” to Shape the Everyday Pedestrian Realm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Elżbieta Macioszek & Anna Granà & Paulo Fernandes & Margarida C. Coelho, 2022. "New Perspectives and Challenges in Traffic and Transportation Engineering Supporting Energy Saving in Smart Cities—A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Global Problem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-8, June.
    3. Andrew Allan & Ali Soltani & Mohammad Hamed Abdi & Melika Zarei, 2022. "Driving Forces behind Land Use and Land Cover Change: A Systematic and Bibliometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Natalia Distefano & Salvatore Leonardi & Nilda Georgina Liotta, 2023. "Walking for Sustainable Cities: Factors Affecting Users’ Willingness to Walk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Nicola Berloco & Stefano Coropulis & Giuseppe Garofalo & Paolo Intini & Vittorio Ranieri, 2023. "Analysis of the Factors Influencing Speed Cushion Effectiveness in the Urban Context: A Case Study Experiment in the City of Bari, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Abdullah H. Al-Nefaie & Theyazn H. H. Aldhyani, 2023. "Predicting CO 2 Emissions from Traffic Vehicles for Sustainable and Smart Environment Using a Deep Learning Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Tao, Tao & Cao, Jason, 2022. "Examining motivations for owning autonomous vehicles: Implications for land use and transportation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    8. Alicja Sołowczuk, 2021. "Effect of Traffic Calming in a Downtown District of Szczecin, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Alnajjar, Hella & Ozbay, Kaan & Iftekhar, Lamia, 2023. "An exploratory analysis on city characteristics likely to affect autonomous vehicle legislation enactment across the United States," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 37-45.
    10. Heriberto Pérez-Acebo & Robert Ziolkowski & Hernán Gonzalo-Orden, 2021. "Evaluation of the Radar Speed Cameras and Panels Indicating the Vehicles’ Speed as Traffic Calming Measures (TCM) in Short Length Urban Areas Located along Rural Roads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Julio César dos Santos & Paulo Ribeiro & Ricardo Jorge Silva Bento, 2023. "A Review of the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility of Workers by Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Anja K. Faulhaber & Jens Hegenberg & Sophie Elise Kahnt & Franz Lambrecht & Daniel Leonhäuser & Stefan Saake & Franka Wehr & Ludger Schmidt & Carsten Sommer, 2022. "Development of a Passenger Assistance System to Increase the Attractiveness of Local Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Maksymilian Mądziel, 2023. "Vehicle Emission Models and Traffic Simulators: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Abdelghaffar, Hossam M. & Batista, S.F.A. & Rehman, Abdur & Cao, Jin & Menéndez, Mónica & Jabari, Saif Eddin, 2024. "Comparison of probabilistic cruising-for-parking time estimation models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:20:p:13023-:d:939672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.