IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p506-d717201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Territorial Distribution of EU Funds Allocation for Developments of Rural Romania during 2014–2020

Author

Listed:
  • Doru Maier

    (Management and Economic Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Blvd, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ancuta-Nicoleta Remete

    (Management and Economic Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Blvd, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Alina-Mihaela Corda

    (Management and Economic Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Blvd, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioana-Alexandra Nastasoiu

    (Management and Economic Engineering Department, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 103-105 Muncii Blvd, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Paul-Sorin Lazăr

    (Faculty of Business, Babeș-Bolyai University, Strada Horea 7, 400038 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Iustin-Atanasiu Pop

    (Faculty of Business, Babeș-Bolyai University, Strada Horea 7, 400038 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Traian-Ionuţ Luca

    (Faculty of Business, Babeș-Bolyai University, Strada Horea 7, 400038 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This study uses cross-section regressions and spatial econometrics techniques to identify determinants of rural development project implementation based on the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) of the European Union. For this, we use 40 Romanian counties. Results show that agricultural land abundancy and land concentration degree are significant positive factors. On the contrary, the local human development level is a negative determinant, low values for this factor being an incentive to compensate the lack of own resources through European funding. No significant effects of the average salary or population density were depicted. Spatial analysis indicates contagion and diffusion processes for fund accession through projects. This behavior is like that in other financial sectors, in which human behavior is a decisive factor, such as the insurance one. A West–East clusterization process is identified for the total project value, conditioned by the identified factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Doru Maier & Ancuta-Nicoleta Remete & Alina-Mihaela Corda & Ioana-Alexandra Nastasoiu & Paul-Sorin Lazăr & Iustin-Atanasiu Pop & Traian-Ionuţ Luca, 2022. "Territorial Distribution of EU Funds Allocation for Developments of Rural Romania during 2014–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:506-:d:717201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kym Anderson & Gordon Rausser & Johan Swinnen, 2013. "Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(2), pages 423-477, June.
    2. Botterill, Linda Courtenay, 2004. "Valuing Agriculture: Balancing Competing Objectives in the Policy Process," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 199-218, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ana-Irina Lequeux-Dincă & Camelia Teodorescu, 2024. "Governance and Development of Tourism in Rural Areas through the Lens of Media in South Bukovina (Romania)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, August.
    2. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2022. "Mapping the Optimal Rural Areas to Invest in through the LEADER Approach: Case Study—Extremadura (SW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wagener, Andreas & Zenker, Juliane, 2018. "Decoupled but not neutral: The effects of stochastic transfers on investment and incomes in rural Thailand," TVSEP Working Papers wp-008, Leibniz Universitaet Hannover, Institute for Environmental Economics and World Trade, Project TVSEP.
    2. Cornelius Hirsch & Harald Oberhofer, 2017. "Bilateral Trade Agreements and Trade Distortions in Agricultural Markets?," WIFO Working Papers 531, WIFO.
    3. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    4. Eshita Gupta & Bharat Ramaswami & E. Somanathan, 2021. "The Distributional Impact of Climate Change: Why Food Prices Matter," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 249-275, July.
    5. Christophe Gouel, 2016. "Trade Policy Coordination and Food Price Volatility," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(4), pages 1018-1037.
    6. Li, J. & Chavas, J.-P., 2018. "How Have China s Agricultural Price Support Policies Affected Market Prices?: A Quantile Regression Evaluation," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277557, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Hendricks, Nathan P. & Smith, Aaron D. & Villoria, Nelson B., 2018. "Global Agricultural Supply Response to Persistent Price Shocks," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274338, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Zulauf, Carl R. & Orden, David, 2014. "Assessing the Political Economy of the 2014 U.S. Farm Bill," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197160, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2017. "Political economy of trade protection and liberalization: in search of agency-based and holistic framework of policy change," MPRA Paper 79504, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Gwen DeBoe & Koen Deconinck & Ben Henderson & Jussi Lankoski, 2020. "Reforming Agricultural Policies Will Help to Improve Environmental Performance," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 30-35, April.
    11. Jelliffe, Jeremy & Santeramo, Fabio, 2023. "CBAM and Agriculture: Opportunities, Challenges, and Perspectives," 2023: The Future of (Ag-) Trade and Trade Governance in Times of Economic Sanctions and Declining Multilateralism, December 10-12, Clearwater Beach, FL 339544, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    12. C. Peter Timmer, 2014. "Food Security in Asia and the Pacific: The Rapidly Changing Role of Rice," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 73-90, January.
    13. Embaye, Weldensie & Hendricks, Nathan & Lilja, Nina, 2017. "Sorghum research and poverty reduction in the presence of trade distortions in Ethiopia," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12(2), June.
    14. Garrone, Maria & Emmers, Dorien & Olper, Alessandro & Swinnen, Johan, 2019. "Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Kym Anderson, 2021. "Food policy in a more volatile climate and trade environment," Departmental Working Papers 2021-25, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2024. "Repurposing agricultural support policies for shared prosperity in rural Fiji," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), January.
    17. Elena Briones Alonso & Jo Swinnen, 2015. "A value chain approach to measuring distortions to incentives and food policy effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy)," Working Papers of LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance 493428, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance.
    18. Alexander M. Danzer & Robert Grundke, 2016. "Coerced Labor in the Cotton Sector: How Global Commodity Prices (Don't) Transmit to the Poor," CESifo Working Paper Series 5937, CESifo.
    19. David Orden & Carl Zulauf, 2015. "Political Economy of the 2014 Farm Bill," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(5), pages 1298-1311.
    20. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2020. "Who has the better story? On the narrative foundations of agricultural development dichotomies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:506-:d:717201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.