IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p488-d716839.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive Organizational Practices, Life Satisfaction, and Psychological Capital in the Public and Private Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Aiste Dirzyte

    (Institute of Psychology, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities 20, 08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Aleksandras Patapas

    (Institute of Public Administration, Mykolas Romeris University, Ateities 20, 08303 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Public and private sector employees confronted stressful life circumstances that affected the world during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, new knowledge on possible psychological and organizational resources is needed. This study aimed to explore positive organizational practices, psychological capital, and life satisfaction of employees in the public and private sectors. The survey applied the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), the Psychological Capital Questionnaire—PCQ-24, validated in the Lithuanian population (the Lith-PCQ-21), and the Positive Organizational Practices Questionnaire. The sample consisted of 582 employees, including 443 public sector and 139 private sector employees. The respondents’ mean age was 42.0981 years (SD = 13.23083). The CFA results confirmed the six-factor structure of positive organizational practices, χ2 = 270,884.785; Df = 406; CFI = 0.996; TLI = 0.996; NFI = 0.995; RMSEA = 0.074 [0.070–0.078]; SRMR = 0.043, the four-factor structure of psychological capital, χ2 = 32,780.109; Df = 190; CFI = 0.983; TLI = 0.980; NFI = 0.978; RMSEA = 0.082 [0.076–0.088]; SRMR = 0.067, and one factor structure of life satisfaction, χ2 = 10,588.246; Df = 10; CFI = 0.999; TLI = 0.999; NFI = 0.999; RMSEA = 0.022 [0.000–0.066]; SRMR = 0.014. The findings revealed that private sector employees demonstrated higher scores of dignity, support, care, forgiveness, and overall positive organizational practices than public sector employees. Private sector employees demonstrated higher optimism scores than public sector employees, and public sector employees demonstrated higher self-efficacy scores than private sector employees. Male employees demonstrated significantly higher scores on dignity, meaning, and forgiveness than females. Significant positive correlations were found between age and resilience, care and age, care and number of working years, care and number of working years in the current organization. Psychological capital mediated the link between positive organizational practices and life satisfaction. Positive organizational practices were linked to life satisfaction and psychological capital in both employees’ groups, but the features of links were distinctive in the public and private sectors. These results signify the importance of positive organizational practices and psychological capital for the life satisfaction of employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Aiste Dirzyte & Aleksandras Patapas, 2022. "Positive Organizational Practices, Life Satisfaction, and Psychological Capital in the Public and Private Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:488-:d:716839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/488/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/488/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhai, Qingguo & Wang, Saifang & Weadon, Helen, 2020. "Thriving at work as a mediator of the relationship between workplace support and life satisfaction," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 168-184, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le-Le Wang & Lan-Xia Zhang & Bin Ju, 2023. "Sustainable Vitality and Learning: The Connotation, Scale, and Heterogeneity of Dualistic Psychological Thriving at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Alexandra Francina Janneke Klijn & Maria Tims & Evgenia I. Lysova & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2021. "Personal Energy at Work: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-49, December.
    3. Francesco Pace & Emanuela Ingusci & Fulvio Signore & Giulia Sciotto, 2021. "Human Resources Management Practices Perception and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Role of Employability and Learning at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Rai, Arpana & Kim, Minseo & Pereira, Vijay, 2024. "How supportive and challenging behaviors of leaders promote employees' thriving at work: An examination of underlying mechanisms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:488-:d:716839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.