IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12650-d933853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Environmental Impact of Partial Substitution of Fish-Based Feed with Algae- and Insect-Based Feed in Salmon Farming

Author

Listed:
  • Pietro Goglio

    (Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
    Department of Agricultural, Food, Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Borgo XX Giugno 74, 06121 Perugia, Italy)

  • Sander Van Den Burg

    (Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Katerina Kousoulaki

    (Nofima AS, Muninbakken 9-13, Breivika, Postboks 6122 Langnes, NO-9291 Tromsø, Norway)

  • Maggie Skirtun

    (Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 4, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Åsa Maria Espmark

    (Nofima AS, Muninbakken 9-13, Breivika, Postboks 6122 Langnes, NO-9291 Tromsø, Norway)

  • Anne Helena Kettunen

    (Nofima AS, Muninbakken 9-13, Breivika, Postboks 6122 Langnes, NO-9291 Tromsø, Norway)

  • Wout Abbink

    (Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

One of the key challenges for aquaculture is to reduce “fishing-for-feed”. Alternative fish feeds need to be environmentally assessed to ensure they are sustainable. The present research consisted of an attributional LCA to (i) estimate the impact on salmon farming of a partially algal–insect-based diet vs a conventional fish meal/fish oil-based diet, (ii) identify the contribution of each process to the environmental impacts of the whole fish farming system, and (iii) identify potential improvements in the algal–insect value chain through sensitivity analysis of various algal–insect production pathways. The study shows that use of algal–insect-based feed resulted in a higher impact for most of the environmental impact categories due to fish feed production, particularly for soybean, insect, and algal meal. This points to the need to optimise production chains for new fish feed ingredients. Algal meal production using sugarcane sugar and optimised technology and insect meal using exhaust heat and renewable electricity would improve the environmental performance of salmon farming systems using insect- and algal-based fish feed. Methodological improvements with regard to system C and N cycle, biodiversity, and plastic use should be explored to inform policy making and support the implementation of sustainable future salmon farming innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Goglio & Sander Van Den Burg & Katerina Kousoulaki & Maggie Skirtun & Åsa Maria Espmark & Anne Helena Kettunen & Wout Abbink, 2022. "The Environmental Impact of Partial Substitution of Fish-Based Feed with Algae- and Insect-Based Feed in Salmon Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12650-:d:933853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12650/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12650/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Anex & Reid Lifset, 2014. "Life Cycle Assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 18(3), pages 321-323, May.
    2. Yuan, Kuang-Yu & Lin, Ying-Chen & Chiueh, Pei-Te & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2018. "Spatial optimization of the food, energy, and water nexus: A life cycle assessment-based approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 502-514.
    3. Jesse Sherry & Jennifer Koester, 2020. "Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture Stewardship Council Certified Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar )," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Xingqiang Song & Ying Liu & Johan Berg Pettersen & Miguel Brandão & Xiaona Ma & Stian Røberg & Björn Frostell, 2019. "Life cycle assessment of recirculating aquaculture systems: A case of Atlantic salmon farming in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(5), pages 1077-1086, October.
    5. Gaspard Philis & Friederike Ziegler & Lars Christian Gansel & Mona Dverdal Jansen & Erik Olav Gracey & Anne Stene, 2019. "Comparing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Salmonid Aquaculture Production Systems: Status and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, April.
    6. Luiz Antonio Martinelli & Mateus Batistella & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Emilio Moran, 2017. "Soy Expansion and Socioeconomic Development in Municipalities of Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaspard Philis & Friederike Ziegler & Mona Dverdal Jansen & Lars Christian Gansel & Sara Hornborg & Grete Hansen Aas & Anne Stene, 2022. "Quantifying environmental impacts of cleaner fish used as sea lice treatments in salmon aquaculture with life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(6), pages 1992-2005, December.
    2. Haochen Hou & Anqi Ren & Lixingbo Yu & Zhen Ma & Yun Zhang & Ying Liu, 2023. "An Environmental Impact Assessment of Largemouth Bass ( Micropterus salmoides ) Aquaculture in Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Evangelos Kallitsis & Anna Korre & Dimitris Mousamas & Pavlos Avramidis, 2020. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Mediterranean Sea Bass and Sea Bream," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-11, November.
    4. Jingyi Liu & Feng Gui & Qian Zhou & Huiwen Cai & Kaida Xu & Sheng Zhao, 2023. "Carbon Footprint of a Large Yellow Croaker Mariculture Models Based on Life-Cycle Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Anna Herzberger & Min Gon Chung & Kelly Kapsar & Kenneth A. Frank & Jianguo Liu, 2019. "Telecoupled Food Trade Affects Pericoupled Trade and Intracoupled Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Huafei Yu & Yaolong Zhao & Yingchun Fu, 2019. "Optimization of Impervious Surface Space Layout for Prevention of Urban Rainstorm Waterlogging: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Russo Lopes, Gabriela & Bastos Lima, Mairon G. & Reis, Tiago N.P. dos, 2021. "Maldevelopment revisited: Inclusiveness and social impacts of soy expansion over Brazil’s Cerrado in Matopiba," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Chad W. Higgins & Majdi Abou Najm, 2020. "An Organizing Principle for the Water-Energy-Food Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Ramin Ghamkhar & Christopher Hartleb & Zack Rabas & Andrea Hicks, 2022. "Evaluation of environmental and economic implications of a cold‐weather aquaponic food production system using life cycle assessment and economic analysis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 862-874, June.
    10. Yuan, Mei-Hua & Lo, Shang-Lien, 2022. "Principles of food-energy-water nexus governance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Enora Barrau & Mathias Glaus, 2022. "Structural and Environmental Performance of Evolving Industrial Symbiosis: A Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Marije Schaafsma & Ilda Dreoni & Lacour Mody Ayompe & Benis Egoh & Dewa Putu Ekayana & Arilson Favareto & Sonny Mumbunan & Louise Nakagawa & Jonas Ngouhouo‐poufoun & Marieke Sassen & Thiago Kanashiro , 2023. "A framework to understand the social impacts of agricultural trade," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 138-150, February.
    13. Ding, Tao & Liang, Liang & Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Min & Wei, Yuqi, 2020. "Water-energy nexus: The origin, development and prospect," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 419(C).
    14. Giovanni Codotto & Massimo Pizzol & Troels J. Hegland & Niels Madsen, 2024. "Model uncertainty versus variability in the life cycle assessment of commercial fisheries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(1), pages 160-172, February.
    15. Hongfang Li & Huixiao Wang & Yaxue Yang & Ruxin Zhao, 2021. "Regional Coordination and Security of Water–Energy–Food Symbiosis in Northeastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    16. Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Mateus Batistella & James D. A. Millington & Emilio Moran & Luiz A. Martinelli & Yue Dou & Jianguo Liu, 2020. "Three Decades of Changes in Brazilian Municipalities and Their Food Production Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Simone Piras & Valdemar João Wesz & Stefano Ghinoi, 2021. "Soy Expansion, Environment, and Human Development: An Analysis across Brazilian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Heidari, Mohammad Davoud & Turner, Ian & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Pelletier, Nathan, 2021. "Operations research for environmental assessment of crop-livestock production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Miranda, Javier & Börner, Jan, 2021. "Farm-Level Impacts of Shifts in Conservation Policy Regimes in Brazil’s Arc of Deforestation," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315225, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Dheanara Pinka & Kazuyo Matsubae, 2023. "Global Warming Potential and Waste Handling of Pearl Farming in Ago Bay, Mie Prefecture, Japan," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12650-:d:933853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.