IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12204-d925817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Logistics Performance Indicators in Low-Income Countries: The Case of the Import–Export Chain in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Mahlet Demere Tadesse

    (Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Helen Zewdie Kine

    (Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Girma Gebresenbet

    (Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Lóránt Tavasszy

    (Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management (TPM), Delft University of Technology, Jaffalaan 5, 2628 BX Delft, The Netherlands)

  • David Ljungberg

    (Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU), 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

Performance evaluation in logistics is crucial in identifying improvement opportunities. This study assessed performance indicators (PIs) for import–export logistics chains, including transport, dry ports, transhipment and warehouses, focusing on Ethiopia. PIs were identified by means of a literature review. An expert survey based on the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to obtain weightings for the indicators to allow an evaluation of the overall performance of the country’s import–export chains. Key challenges faced in the sector were also identified. Indicators such as turnaround time and damage frequency were given high weightings by experts for dry port PIs, security was given the highest weighting for transport PIs, and order lead time was given the highest weighting for warehouse PIs. Technological advancements, human resource capacity building and government policies were found to be the main areas that could improve the performance of logistics operations and address the challenges faced by the sector. These findings could provide a new and comprehensive picture of the key performance indicators of Ethiopian import–export logistics chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahlet Demere Tadesse & Helen Zewdie Kine & Girma Gebresenbet & Lóránt Tavasszy & David Ljungberg, 2022. "Key Logistics Performance Indicators in Low-Income Countries: The Case of the Import–Export Chain in Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12204-:d:925817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Özceylan, Eren & Çetinkaya, Cihan & Erbaş, Mehmet & Kabak, Mehmet, 2016. "Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 323-337.
    2. Benjamin Nitsche, 2021. "Embracing the Potentials of Intermodal Transport in Ethiopia: Strategies to Facilitate Export-Led Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. D. E. Onwuegbuchunam, 2018. "Assessing Port Governance, Devolution and Terminal Performance in Nigeria," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Richmond Kwesi Ansah & Kwabena Obiri-Yeboah & Grace Akipelu, 2020. "Improving the freight transport of a developing economy: a case of Boankra inland port," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Gebreyohannes Gebreslassie Gebrewahid & Andreas Wald, 2017. "Export Barriers and Competitiveness of Developing Economies: The Case of the Ethiopian Leather Footwear Industry," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 396-416, October.
    6. Lam, H.Y. & Choy, K.L. & Ho, G.T.S. & Cheng, Stephen W.Y. & Lee, C.K.M., 2015. "A knowledge-based logistics operations planning system for mitigating risk in warehouse order fulfillment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PC), pages 763-779.
    7. Jean-François Arvis & Gaël Raballand & Jean-François Marteau, 2010. "The Cost of Being Landlocked : Logistics Costs and Supply Chain Reliability," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2489.
    8. Afshin Jamshidi & Farzad Jamshidi & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Amar Ramudhin, 2019. "A review of priority criteria and decision-making methods applied in selection of sustainable city logistics initiatives and collaboration partners," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5175-5193, August.
    9. Sheng-Li Si & Xiao-Yue You & Hu-Chen Liu & Ping Zhang, 2018. "DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-33, January.
    10. Ciortescu Cezar-Gabriel, 2010. "Performance Assessment In Operating Dry Ports," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 934-938, December.
    11. Dilay Çelebi, 2019. "The role of logistics performance in promoting trade," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(3), pages 307-323, September.
    12. Pradosh Nath & Bhagirath Behera, 2011. "A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 141-162, February.
    13. Rashidi, Kamran & Cullinane, Kevin, 2019. "Evaluating the sustainability of national logistics performance using Data Envelopment Analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 35-46.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar, 2015. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-57.
    15. Rong-Her Chiu & Le-Hui Lin & Shih-Chan Ting, 2014. "Evaluation of Green Port Factors and Performance: A Fuzzy AHP Analysis," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-12, January.
    16. Prem Vrat, 2014. "Storage and Warehousing," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Materials Management, edition 127, chapter 14, pages 243-262, Springer.
    17. Lam Canh Nguyen & Theo Notteboom, 2019. "The relations between dry port characteristics and regional port-hinterland settings: findings for a global sample of dry ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(1), pages 24-42, January.
    18. Syed Abdul Rehman KHAN & Zhang YU, 2020. "The Impact of Terrorism on Economics and Logistics Performance: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of SAARC Member States," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(4), pages 99-117, December.
    19. Rezaei, Jafar & van Roekel, Wilco S. & Tavasszy, Lori, 2018. "Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 158-169.
    20. Lai, Kee-hung & Ngai, E. W. T. & Cheng, T. C. E., 2002. "Measures for evaluating supply chain performance in transport logistics," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 439-456, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Göçer, Aysu & Özpeynirci, Özgür & Semiz, Meltem, 2022. "Logistics performance index-driven policy development: An application to Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 20-32.
    2. Dilupa Nakandala & Yung Po Tsang & Henry Lau & Carman Ka Man Lee, 2022. "An Industrial Blockchain-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Global Freight Management in Agricultural Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Gürler, Hasan Emin & Özçalıcı, Mehmet & Pamucar, Dragan, 2024. "Determining criteria weights with genetic algorithms for multi-criteria decision making methods: The case of logistics performance index rankings of European Union countries," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Mustafa Polat & Karahan Kara & Avni Zafer Acar, 2023. "Competitiveness based logistics performance index: An empirical analysis in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 24(2-3), pages 97-119, June.
    5. Felix Kin Peng Hui & Lu Aye & Colin F. Duffield, 2019. "Engaging Employees with Good Sustainability: Key Performance Indicators for Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, May.
    6. Munim, Ziaul Haque & Duru, Okan & Ng, Adolf K.Y., 2022. "Transhipment port's competitiveness forecasting using analytic network process modelling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 70-82.
    7. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Milena Lakicevic & Bojan Srdjevic, 2022. "An Approach to Developing the Multicriteria Optimal Forest Management Plan: The “Fruska Gora” National Park Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Zahra Mohammadnazari & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2021. "Sustainable construction supply chain management with the spotlight of inventory optimization under uncertainty," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10937-10972, July.
    10. Fahim, Patrick B.M. & Rezaei, Jafar & Montreuil, Benoit & Tavasszy, Lorant, 2022. "Port performance evaluation and selection in the Physical Internet," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 83-94.
    11. Ioannis Katrakylidis & Michael Madas, 2020. "Catching-up effects in the logistics industry and the dynamic linkages with international trade and economic growth: empirical evidence from an international panel dataset," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 197-205.
    12. Naduni Kalansuriya & Shara Silva & Nishen Perera & Banuli Wanigarathna & Ruwan Jayathilaka & Parami Paranavitana & Saliya C. Arachchige, 2024. "Analysing the Influence of Logistics, Corruption, FDI and GDP on Global Competitiveness: a Cross-Sectional Study," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 13532-13551, September.
    13. Hui Zhao & Yuanyuan Ge & Jingqi Zhang, 2022. "Evaluation on the implementation effect of public participation in the decision-making of NIMBY facilities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-29, February.
    14. Hamid Reza Fazeli & Qingjin Peng, 2023. "Integrated approaches of BWM-QFD and FUCOM-QFD for improving weighting solution of design matrix," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1003-1020, March.
    15. Nien-Ping Chen & Kao-Yi Shen & Chiung-Ju Liang, 2021. "Hybrid Decision Model for Evaluating Blockchain Business Strategy: A Bank’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    16. Anna Kędzior & Konrad Kułakowski, 2023. "Multiple-Criteria Heuristic Rating Estimation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Ertunç, Ela & Uyan, Mevlut, 2022. "Land valuation with Best Worst Method in land consolidation projects," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    18. Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili & Turan Erden, 2021. "Comparative evaluation of GIS-based best–worst method (BWM) for emergency facility planning: perspectives from two decision-maker groups," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 1031-1067, January.
    19. Mi, Xiaomei & Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang & Shen, Wenjing & Lev, Benjamin, 2019. "The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 205-225.
    20. Tavana, Madjid & Mina, Hassan & Santos-Arteaga, Francisco J., 2023. "A general Best-Worst method considering interdependency with application to innovation and technology assessment at NASA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12204-:d:925817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.