IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11687-d917636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Business Process Reference Model for the Development of a Wine Traceability System

Author

Listed:
  • Sotiris P. Gayialis

    (Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Evripidis P. Kechagias

    (Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Georgios A. Papadopoulos

    (Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

  • Nikolaos A. Panayiotou

    (Sector of Industrial Management and Operational Research, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 15772 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

Traceability is among the most significant challenges in supply chains, where multiple stakeholders and activities are involved in the production and distribution of products. No supply chain can become sustainable without effectively addressing the problem of traceability by recognizing, monitoring, and implementing all necessary activities of the processes. This research provides a reference model for effective wine supply chain traceability and is part of a research project for the development of a blockchain-enabled traceability system. The reference model not only depicts processes but also covers all views that are necessary for achieving the whole picture of an effective traceability system. These views include the value chain, organizational resources, functions, processes, systems, data, and risks that are related to wine production and distribution. The reference model has a strong contribution to practice and research as it pertains to bridging the barrier between developers and users while also offering significant research outcomes. The research output is the reference model that includes standard wine traceability processes and all necessary data for effective wine supply chain traceability. The results of this research will be used for creating the traceability system’s specifications and ensuring that it will be effectively designed and implemented. The reference model can also be used for the implementation and adaptation of the traceability system to the stakeholders of the wine supply chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotiris P. Gayialis & Evripidis P. Kechagias & Georgios A. Papadopoulos & Nikolaos A. Panayiotou, 2022. "A Business Process Reference Model for the Development of a Wine Traceability System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11687-:d:917636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11687/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11687/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurt Sandkuhl & Hans-Georg Fill & Stijn Hoppenbrouwers & John Krogstie & Florian Matthes & Andreas Opdahl & Gerhard Schwabe & Ömer Uludag & Robert Winter, 2018. "From Expert Discipline to Common Practice: A Vision and Research Agenda for Extending the Reach of Enterprise Modeling," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(1), pages 69-80, February.
    2. Francesca Michelino & Antonello Cammarano & Andrea Celone & Mauro Caputo, 2019. "The Linkage between Sustainability and Innovation Performance in IT Hardware Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Lea Fuenfschilling & Niki Frantzeskaki & Lars Coenen, 2019. "Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 219-228, February.
    4. Valeria Sodano, 2019. "Innovation Trajectories and Sustainability in the Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Nino Adamashvili & Radu State & Caterina Tricase & Mariantonietta Fiore, 2021. "Blockchain-Based Wine Supply Chain for the Industry Advancement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Alaa M. Ubaid & Fikri T. Dweiri, 2020. "Business process management (BPM): terminologies and methodologies unified," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1046-1064, December.
    7. Thomas K. Dasaklis & Theodore G. Voutsinas & Giannis T. Tsoulfas & Fran Casino, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Blockchain-Enabled Supply Chain Traceability Implementations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-30, February.
    8. Sotiris P. Gayialis & Evripidis P. Kechagias & Georgios A. Papadopoulos & Dimitrios Masouras, 2022. "A Review and Classification Framework of Traceability Approaches for Identifying Product Supply Chain Counterfeiting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Marco Marconi & Eugenia Marilungo & Alessandra Papetti & Michele Germani, 2017. "Traceability as a means to investigate supply chain sustainability: the real case of a leather shoe supply chain," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(22), pages 6638-6652, November.
    10. Angelo Corallo & Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2020. "A systematic literature review to explore traceability and lifecycle relationship," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(15), pages 4789-4807, July.
    11. Nikolaos A. Panayiotou & Vasileios P. Stavrou & Sotiris P. Gayialis, 2017. "The Application of a Business Process Modeling Architecture in the Supply Chain of a Manufacturing Company: A Case Study," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Evangelos Grigoroudis & Michael Doumpos (ed.), Operational Research in Business and Economics, pages 1-16, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Kanan & Baha Taha & Yahya Saleh & Mohammed Alsayed & Ramiz Assaf & Mohamed Ben Hassen & Elham Alshaibani & Ali Bakir & Weam Tunsi, 2023. "Green Innovation as a Mediator between Green Human Resource Management Practices and Sustainable Performance in Palestinian Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Hao Xu & Kaiye Gao & Yuanying Chi & Yahui Chen & Rui Peng, 2022. "Interactive Impacts of Overconfidence and Competitive Preference on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-23, November.
    3. Atul Kumar Singh & V. R. Prasath Kumar & Muhammad Irfan & Saeed Reza Mohandes & Usama Awan, 2023. "Revealing the Barriers of Blockchain Technology for Supply Chain Transparency and Sustainability in the Construction Industry: An Application of Pythagorean FAHP Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Hira Hameed & Nazir Ahmad Zafar & Eman H. Alkhammash & Myriam Hadjouni, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Formal Model for Food Supply Chain Management System Using VDM-SL," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Syaiful Anwar & Tomy Perdana & Meddy Rachmadi & Trisna Insan Noor, 2023. "Product Traceability and Supply Chain Sustainability of Black Soybeans as Raw Materials for Soy Sauce in Maintaining Quality and Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Xin Zhang & Yue Li & Xiangzhen Peng & Zhiyao Zhao & Jiaqi Han & Jiping Xu, 2022. "Information Traceability Model for the Grain and Oil Food Supply Chain Based on Trusted Identification and Trusted Blockchain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Syaiful Anwar & Tomy Perdana & Meddy Rachmadi & Trisna Insan Noor, 2022. "Traceability Information Model for Sustainability of Black Soybean Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Carlos Smaniotto Costa & Marluci Menezes & Petja Ivanova-Radovanova & Tatiana Ruchinskaya & Konstantinos Lalenis & Monica Bocci, 2021. "Planning Perspectives and Approaches for Activating Underground Built Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    6. Adams, Clare & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Moglia, Magnus, 2023. "Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Lindsay P. Galway & Charles Z. Levkoe & Rachel L. W. Portinga & Kathryn Milun, 2021. "A Scoping Review Examining Governance, Co-Creation, and Social and Ecological Justice in Living Labs Literature," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Bianca Polenzani & Chiara Riganelli & Andrea Marchini, 2020. "Sustainability Perception of Local Extra Virgin Olive Oil and Consumers’ Attitude: A New Italian Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, January.
    9. Devon McAslan & Farah Najar Arevalo & David A. King & Thaddeus R. Miller, 2021. "Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Jakob Keller & Martin Jung & Rainer Lasch, 2022. "Sustainability Governance: Insights from a Cocoa Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Rachel Greer & Timo Wirth & Derk Loorbach, 2023. "The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 693-718, June.
    12. Khushboo E-Fatima & Rasoul Khandan & Amin Hosseinian-Far & Dilshad Sarwar, 2023. "The Adoption of Robotic Process Automation Considering Financial Aspects in Beef Supply Chains: An Approach towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    13. Mladen Krstić & Giulio Paolo Agnusdei & Snežana Tadić & Pier Paolo Miglietta, 2023. "Prioritization of e-traceability drivers in the agri-food supply chains," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Lingling Xu & Tingting Tian, 2024. "Blockchain-enabled enterprise bleaching green regulation banking evolution game analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27457-27483, November.
    16. Frans Sengers & Bruno Turnheim & Frans Berkhout, 2021. "Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(6), pages 1148-1171, September.
    17. Shou, Yongyi & Zhao, Xinyu & Dai, Jing & Xu, Dong, 2021. "Matching traceability and supply chain coordination: Achieving operational innovation for superior performance," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    18. Maria Federica Cordova & Andrea Celone, 2019. "SDGs and Innovation in the Business Context Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Waes, Arnoud van & Nikolaeva, Anna & Raven, Rob, 2021. "Challenges and dilemmas in strategic urban experimentationAn analysis of four cycling innovation living labs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    20. Daniel Black & Susanne Charlesworth & Maria Ester Dal Poz & Erika Cristina Francisco & Adina Paytan & Ian Roderick & Timo von Wirth & Kevin Winter, 2023. "Comparing Societal Impact Planning and Evaluation Approaches across Four Urban Living Labs (in Food-Energy-Water Systems)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11687-:d:917636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.