IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11474-d913843.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Untapped Aspects of Waste Management versus Green Deal Objectives

Author

Listed:
  • Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș

    (Doctoral School, University of Physical Education and Sports, 060057 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Teodora Zecheru

    (Carol I National Defense University, 050662 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Smart waste management is an important tool for energy and resource conservation, and the related recycling and reuse policies are conducive to a positive impact on the ecological footprint. Since waste treatment is a very expensive process, the principle of prevention should be implemented increasingly at the European level to meet the Green Deal’s objectives and related eco-friendly approaches more easily and cost-effectively. Therefore, the rationale of the present work was to statistically study, for the first time, from a waste management viewpoint, the waste categories and quantities produced in the past decade, and mainly eight waste categories were compared at the Romanian versus the European level, including on the level of European regulation implementation. For that, assumptions were made and ANOVA and path analysis were performed. The results of ANOVA emphasize the differences between the eight types of waste collected, to understand the challenges and the weak points of the member states in their approach to meeting the Green Deal’s objectives and gaining sustainable development. Furthermore, the causes of differences in the European Union’s member states were analyzed in clusters, based on three criteria: total waste, waste management, and waste treatment, and the results are discussed here. The study revealed that Romania proved an increased efficiency in waste treatment and the path analysis proves that waste management is better implemented than treatment management. The study concludes that, regardless of the results obtained so far, further endeavors are necessary at the Romanian governmental level to meet the waste-related European goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Teodora Zecheru, 2022. "Untapped Aspects of Waste Management versus Green Deal Objectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11474-:d:913843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11474/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11474/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lidija Đurđevac Ignjatović & Vesna Krstić & Vlastimir Radonjanin & Violeta Jovanović & Mirjana Malešev & Dragan Ignjatović & Vanja Đurđevac, 2022. "Application of Cement Paste in Mining Works, Environmental Protection, and the Sustainable Development Goals in the Mining Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Rosaria E.C. Amaral & Joel Brito & Matt Buckman & Elicia Drake & Esther Ilatova & Paige Rice & Carlos Sabbagh & Sergei Voronkin & Yewande S. Abraham, 2020. "Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Oliva Maria Dourado Martins & Dragan Ilic & Mădălina Belous & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Cezar Braicu & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2020. "Green and Sustainable Public Procurement—An Instrument for Nudging Consumer Behavior. A Case Study on Romanian Green Public Agriculture across Different Sectors of Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. José María Fernández-González & Carmen Díaz-López & Jaime Martín-Pascual & Montserrat Zamorano, 2020. "Recycling Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Majdi Argoubi & Haifa Jammeli & Hatem Masri, 2020. "The intellectual structure of the waste management field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 294(1), pages 655-676, November.
    6. Marcela Taušová & Eva Mihaliková & Katarína Čulková & Beáta Stehlíková & Peter Tauš & Dušan Kudelas & Ľubomír Štrba & Lucia Domaracká, 2020. "Analysis of Municipal Waste Development and Management in Self-Governing Regions of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Cristina Bianca Pocol & Margaux Pinoteau & Antonio Amuza & Adriana Burlea-Schiopoiu & Alexandra-Ioana Glogovețan, 2020. "Food Waste Behavior among Romanian Consumers: A Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    8. Beáta Stehlíková & Katarína Čulková & Marcela Taušová & Ľubomír Štrba & Eva Mihaliková, 2021. "Evaluation of Communal Waste in Slovakia from the View of Chosen Economic Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria-Georgeta Moldovan & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2022. "Resources Management for a Resilient World: A Literature Review of Eastern European Countries with Focus on Household Behaviour and Trends Related to Food Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Marat M. Khayrutdinov & Vladimir I. Golik & Alexander V. Aleksakhin & Ekaterina V. Trushina & Natalia V. Lazareva & Yulia V. Aleksakhina, 2022. "Proposal of an Algorithm for Choice of a Development System for Operational and Environmental Safety in Mining," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Ghazale Kordi & Parsa Hasanzadeh-Moghimi & Mohammad Mahdi Paydar & Ebrahim Asadi-Gangraj, 2023. "A multi-objective location-routing model for dental waste considering environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 755-792, September.
    4. Nikola Puvača & Vincenzo Tufarelli, 2022. "Sustainable Organic Agriculture for Developing Agribusiness Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-3, August.
    5. Marcela Bindzarova Gergelova & Slavomir Labant & Jozef Mizak & Pavel Sustek & Lubomir Leicher, 2021. "Inventory of Locations of Old Mining Works Using LiDAR Data: A Case Study in Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    6. Cătălina Chinie & Isabelle Biclesanu & Francesco Bellini, 2021. "The Impact of Awareness Campaigns on Combating the Food Wasting Behavior of Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Daniel Nijloveanu & Victor Tița & Nicolae Bold & Doru Anastasiu Popescu & Dragoș Smedescu & Cosmina Smedescu & Gina Fîntîneru, 2024. "The Development of a Prediction Model Related to Food Loss and Waste in Consumer Segments of Agrifood Chain Using Machine Learning Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-27, October.
    8. Bohuslava Mihalčová & Antonín Korauš & Olha Prokopenko & Jozefína Hvastová & Magdaléna Freňáková & Peter Gallo & Beáta Balogová, 2021. "Effective Management Tools for Solving the Problem of Poverty in Relation to Food Waste in Context of Integrated Management of Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Vera Amicarelli & Caterina Tricase & Alessia Spada & Christian Bux, 2021. "Households’ Food Waste Behavior at Local Scale: A Cluster Analysis after the COVID-19 Lockdown," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. Amicarelli, Vera & Lagioia, Giovanni & Sampietro, Stefania & Bux, Christian, 2022. "Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed food waste perception and behavior? Evidence from Italian consumers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    11. Mirza Marvel Cequea & Jessika Milagros Vásquez Neyra & Valentina Gomes Haensel Schmitt & Marcos Ferasso, 2021. "Household Food Consumption and Wastage during the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak: A Comparison between Peru and Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Claudia Giordano & Silvio Franco, 2021. "Household Food Waste from an International Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, May.
    13. Violeta Jovanović & Sunčica Stanković & Vesna Krstić, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability in Mining Companies as a Result of the Interaction between Knowledge Management and Green Innovation—The SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    14. Cãlin Veghes & Andreea Strambu Dima, 2022. "Romanian Agri-Food Businesses and the European Green Deal: An Exploratory Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 24(60), pages 508-508, April.
    15. Cheynesh B. Kongar-Syuryun & Alexander V. Aleksakhin & Evgeniya N. Eliseeva & Anna V. Zhaglovskaya & Roman V. Klyuev & Denis A. Petrusevich, 2023. "Modern Technologies Providing a Full Cycle of Geo-Resources Development," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Paweł Dziekański & Adam Wyszkowski & Piotr Prus & Andrzej Pawlik & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2022. "Zero Waste as a Determinant of Shaping Green Economy Processes on the Example of Communes of Eastern Poland in 2010–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Hridoy Roy & Samiha Raisa Alam & Rayhan Bin-Masud & Tonima Rahman Prantika & Md. Nahid Pervez & Md. Shahinoor Islam & Vincenzo Naddeo, 2022. "A Review on Characteristics, Techniques, and Waste-to-Energy Aspects of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Bangladesh Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    18. Yetkin Özbük, Raife Meltem & Coşkun, Ayşen & Filimonau, Viachaslau, 2022. "The impact of COVID-19 on food management in households of an emerging economy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    19. Zorica Sovrlić & Snežana Tošić & Renata Kovačević & Violeta Jovanović & Vesna Krstić, 2022. "The Importance of Measuring Arsenic in Honey, Water, and PM 10 for Food Safety as an Environmental Study: Experience from the Mining and Metallurgical Districts of Bor, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Roxana-Larisa Cadar & Antonio Amuza & Diana Elena Dumitras & Mihaela Mihai & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2021. "Analysing Clusters of Consumers Who Use Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11474-:d:913843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.