IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p11002-d905654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-Driven Optimal Battery Storage Sizing for Grid-Connected Hybrid Distributed Generations Considering Solar and Wind Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Abdul Rauf

    (Electrical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Center for Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Mahmoud Kassas

    (Electrical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Center for Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

  • Muhammad Khalid

    (Electrical Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    Center for Renewable Energy and Power Systems, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
    SDAIA-KFUPM Joint Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

A large-scale renewable-based sustainable power system requires multifaced techno-economic optimization and energy penetration. Due to the volatile and non-periodic nature of renewable energy, the uncertainty of renewables combined with load uncertainties significantly impacts the operational efficiency of renewable integration. The complexities in balancing demand, generation, and maintaining system reliability have introduced new challenges in the current distribution system. Most of the associated challenges can be effectively reduced by using a battery energy storage system (BESS) and the right techniques for handling uncertainties. In this paper, a distributionally robust optimization (DRO) technique with a linear decision rule is formulated for the unit commitment (UC) framework for optimal scheduling of a distribution network that consists of a wind farm, solar PV, a distributed generator (DG), and BESS. To cut the energy cost per unit, BESS plays an important role by storing energy at an off-peak time for on-peak-time use with relatively lower prices. For the all-time minimum overall systems cost, the distribution system requires an optimal size of the BESS to be connected to provide optimal scheduling of DGs. Three case studies are formulated using an IEEE 14 bus system (converted from MW to kW to match the BESS size available in the market) and solved with the proposed distributionally robust optimization technique to achieve the maximum operating point with an optimal capacity of BESS, i.e., wind, solar and hybrid. Each case study has its own optimal 30-min interval schedule for DGs along with the optimal capacity of BESS. The cost comparison with and without BESS and its impact on the start-up and shut down of DGs is reported with all the dynamic economic dispatch results, including the battery’s state-of-charge profile. The proposed technique can handle the uncertainties in renewables and allows economical energy dispatch and optimal BESS sizing with comparatively lower computational processing and complexities.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdul Rauf & Mahmoud Kassas & Muhammad Khalid, 2022. "Data-Driven Optimal Battery Storage Sizing for Grid-Connected Hybrid Distributed Generations Considering Solar and Wind Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11002-:d:905654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11002/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/11002/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fahad Alismail & Mohamed A. Abdulgalil & Muhammad Khalid, 2021. "Optimal Coordinated Planning of Energy Storage and Tie-Lines to Boost Flexibility with High Wind Power Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Lebotsa, Moshoko Emily & Sigauke, Caston & Bere, Alphonce & Fildes, Robert & Boylan, John E., 2018. "Short term electricity demand forecasting using partially linear additive quantile regression with an application to the unit commitment problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 104-118.
    3. Niknam, Taher & Khodaei, Amin & Fallahi, Farhad, 2009. "A new decomposition approach for the thermal unit commitment problem," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1667-1674, September.
    4. Tuohy, Aidan & Meibom, Peter & Denny, Eleanor & O'Malley, Mark, 2009. "Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration," MPRA Paper 34849, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hemmati, Reza & Saboori, Hedayat & Saboori, Saeid, 2016. "Assessing wind uncertainty impact on short term operation scheduling of coordinated energy storage systems and thermal units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 74-84.
    6. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    7. Khalid, Muhammad & Aguilera, Ricardo P. & Savkin, Andrey V. & Agelidis, Vassilios G., 2018. "On maximizing profit of wind-battery supported power station based on wind power and energy price forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 764-773.
    8. Zhao, Baining & Qian, Tong & Tang, Wenhu & Liang, Qiheng, 2022. "A data-enhanced distributionally robust optimization method for economic dispatch of integrated electricity and natural gas systems with wind uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Liu, Yikui & Wu, Lei & Li, Jie, 2019. "Towards accurate modeling of dynamic startup/shutdown and ramping processes of thermal units in unit commitment problems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    10. Ghahramani, Mehrdad & Nazari-Heris, Morteza & Zare, Kazem & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2019. "Energy and reserve management of a smart distribution system by incorporating responsive-loads /battery/wind turbines considering uncertain parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 205-219.
    11. Angelos Georghiou & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2019. "The decision rule approach to optimization under uncertainty: methodology and applications," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 545-576, October.
    12. Nemati, Mohsen & Braun, Martin & Tenbohlen, Stefan, 2018. "Optimization of unit commitment and economic dispatch in microgrids based on genetic algorithm and mixed integer linear programming," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 944-963.
    13. Wang, Yuwei & Yang, Yuanjuan & Fei, Haoran & Song, Minghao & Jia, Mengyao, 2022. "Wasserstein and multivariate linear affine based distributionally robust optimization for CCHP-P2G scheduling considering multiple uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    14. Mohammed Atta Abdulgalil & Muhammad Khalid & Fahad Alismail, 2019. "Optimal Sizing of Battery Energy Storage for a Grid-Connected Microgrid Subjected to Wind Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-29, June.
    15. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Schmuel S., 2013. "Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2500, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    16. Pei, Zhi & Lu, Haimin & Jin, Qingwei & Zhang, Lianmin, 2022. "Target-based distributionally robust optimization for single machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 420-431.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi’an Wang & Zhe Wu & Dong Ni, 2024. "Large-Scale Optimization among Photovoltaic and Concentrated Solar Power Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review and Algorithm Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-38, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Vos, K. & Stevens, N. & Devolder, O. & Papavasiliou, A. & Hebb, B. & Matthys-Donnadieu, J., 2019. "Dynamic dimensioning approach for operating reserves: Proof of concept in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 272-285.
    2. Johnson, Samuel C. & Papageorgiou, Dimitri J. & Mallapragada, Dharik S. & Deetjen, Thomas A. & Rhodes, Joshua D. & Webber, Michael E., 2019. "Evaluating rotational inertia as a component of grid reliability with high penetrations of variable renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 258-271.
    3. Aghaei, Jamshid & Nikoobakht, Ahmad & Siano, Pierluigi & Nayeripour, Majid & Heidari, Alireza & Mardaneh, Mohammad, 2016. "Exploring the reliability effects on the short term AC security-constrained unit commitment: A stochastic evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1016-1032.
    4. Wang, Bo & Wang, Shuming & Zhou, Xianzhong & Watada, Junzo, 2016. "Multi-objective unit commitment with wind penetration and emission concerns under stochastic and fuzzy uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 18-31.
    5. Heejung Park, 2022. "A Unit Commitment Model Considering Feasibility of Operating Reserves under Stochastic Optimization Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    6. Yonghan Feng & Sarah Ryan, 2016. "Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 29-62, January.
    7. Ilias G. Marneris & Pandelis N. Biskas & Anastasios G. Bakirtzis, 2017. "Stochastic and Deterministic Unit Commitment Considering Uncertainty and Variability Reserves for High Renewable Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Álvaro Lorca & X. Andy Sun & Eugene Litvinov & Tongxin Zheng, 2016. "Multistage Adaptive Robust Optimization for the Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 32-51, February.
    9. Meng, Fanyi & Bai, Yang & Jin, Jingliang, 2021. "An advanced real-time dispatching strategy for a distributed energy system based on the reinforcement learning algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 13-24.
    10. Jan Abrell & Friedrich Kunz, 2015. "Integrating Intermittent Renewable Wind Generation - A Stochastic Multi-Market Electricity Model for the European Electricity Market," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 117-147, March.
    11. David Schönheit & Dominik Möst, 2019. "The Effect of Offshore Wind Capacity Expansion on Uncertainties in Germany’s Day-Ahead Wind Energy Forecasts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    12. Faezeh Akhavizadegan & Lizhi Wang & James McCalley, 2020. "Scenario Selection for Iterative Stochastic Transmission Expansion Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Victor M. Zavala & Kibaek Kim & Mihai Anitescu & John Birge, 2017. "A Stochastic Electricity Market Clearing Formulation with Consistent Pricing Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 557-576, June.
    14. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    15. Noori, Ehsan & Khazaei, Ehsan & Tavaro, Mehdi & Bardideh, Farhad, 2019. "Economically Operation of Power Utilities Base on MILP Approach," MPRA Paper 95910, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    17. Hain, Martin & Kargus, Tobias & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2022. "An electricity price modeling framework for renewable-dominant markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 66, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    18. Munoz, Francisco D. & Pumarino, Bruno J. & Salas, Ignacio A., 2017. "Aiming low and achieving it: A long-term analysis of a renewable policy in Chile," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 304-314.
    19. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    20. Aguilar, Diego & Quinones, Jhon J. & Pineda, Luis R. & Ostanek, Jason & Castillo, Luciano, 2024. "Optimal scheduling of renewable energy microgrids: A robust multi-objective approach with machine learning-based probabilistic forecasting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 369(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:11002-:d:905654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.