IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10934-d904229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph

Author

Listed:
  • Dingpu Shi

    (School of Computer and Information, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Jincheng Zhou

    (School of Computer and Information, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China
    Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Guizhou Province, Duyun 558000, China
    Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Qiannan, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Dan Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Guizhou Province, Duyun 558000, China
    Key Laboratory of Complex Systems and Intelligent Optimization of Qiannan, Duyun 558000, China
    School of Mathematics and Statistics, Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities, Duyun 558000, China)

  • Xiaopeng Wu

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130000, China)

Abstract

Intelligent education research has become a research hotspot in recent years. The Citespace software that operates a graph visualization function was used to clarify the current situation, hot spots, and evolutionary trends of intelligent education research development; the authors, institutions, and countries engaged in intelligent education research, as well as the basic knowledge structure, main keywords, citation clustering, dual-map overlay of journals and citation emergence of intelligent education research. The results show that the annual number of publications in the field has shown an upward trend since 2010, with strong communication among research institutions and countries, but weak communication among researchers. Among them, the United States is the center of the global collaborative network of intelligent education research. The basic knowledge structure of intelligence education research is mainly composed of Classroom Management, Evaluation Index, 5G Network, and Big Data Analytics. The dual-map overlay analysis of journals shows that the core areas of intelligence education are increasing, and the analysis of keywords and cited literature shows that Intelligence Tutoring System, AI system, Students and Education, Model, and System are high-frequency words with high-intensity burstness. In addition, research on intelligent education is characterized by multi-country, multi-field, and multi-disciplinary integration, and the adoption of Big Data, Distance Education Technology and Artificial Intelligence Technology to provide scientific support for teaching and learning will become the key research content in this field in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Dingpu Shi & Jincheng Zhou & Dan Wang & Xiaopeng Wu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Intelligent Education from the Perspective of Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10934-:d:904229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10934/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10934/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Lu, 2019. "Artificial intelligence: a survey on evolution, models, applications and future trends," Journal of Management Analytics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Wenjing Yin & Naeem Jan, 2022. "An Artificial Intelligent Virtual Reality Interactive Model for Distance Education," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2022, pages 1-7, February.
    3. Qiang Yang, 2019. "Research on Active Service Model with Personalized Education Resources," Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 95-104, March.
    4. Chaomei Chen & Loet Leydesdorff, 2014. "Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays: A new method of publication portfolio analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(2), pages 334-351, February.
    5. Qiang Yang, 2019. "Research on Active Service Model with Personalized Education Resources," Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(1), pages 95-104.
    6. Shapiro, Helen & Taylor, Lance, 1990. "The state and industrial strategy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 861-878, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linchao Huang & Jincheng Zhou & Dan Wang & Fang Wang & Jiu Liu & Dingpu Shi & Xiaohong Chen & Duo Yang & Qingna Pan, 2023. "Visualization Analysis of Global Self-Regulated Learning Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends Based on Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Duo Yang & Jincheng Zhou & Dingpu Shi & Qingna Pan & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Global Digital Education via Knowledge Graph Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Qingna Pan & Jincheng Zhou & Duo Yang & Dingpu Shi & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2023. "Mapping Knowledge Domain Analysis in Deep Learning Research of Global Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Xiaohong Chen & Jincheng Zhou & Jinqiu Wang & Dan Wang & Jiu Liu & Dingpu Shi & Duo Yang & Qingna Pan, 2022. "Visualizing Status, Hotspots, and Future Trends in Mathematical Literacy Research via Knowledge Graph," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciurea Iulia-Cristina, 2024. "The Impact of the EU AI Act on the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – A Text Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2857-2870.
    2. Paus, Eva, 1995. "Exports, economic growth and the consolidation of peace in El Salvador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(12), pages 2173-2193, December.
    3. Hailiang Li & M. James C. Crabbe & Haikui Chen, 2020. "History and Trends in Ecological Stoichiometry Research from 1992 to 2019: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Cailin Wang & Jidong Wu & Xin He & Mengqi Ye & Wenhui Liu & Rumei Tang, 2018. "Emerging Trends and New Developments in Disaster Research after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Sanjaya Lall, 1996. "Understanding Technology Development," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Learning from the Asian Tigers, chapter 2, pages 27-58, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    7. Christos N. Pitelis, 2011. "Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Integration," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume III, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    9. Deepak Nayyar, 2006. "Development through Globalization?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-29, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    10. Li Da Xu, 2020. "The contribution of systems science to Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 618-631, July.
    11. Rodrigo Marçal Gandia & Fabio Antonialli & Bruna Habib & Arthur De Miranda Neto & Danilo Alves de Lima & Joel Yutaka & André Luiz & Isabelle Nicolaï, 2017. "Autonomous vehicles: Scientometric and bibliometric studies," Post-Print hal-01652939, HAL.
    12. Xinxin Wang & Zeshui Xu & Yong Qin, 2022. "Structure, trend and prospect of operational research: a scientific analysis for publications from 1952 to 2020 included in Web of Science database," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 649-672, December.
    13. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    14. Yuxin Fang & Hongjun Cao & Jihui Sun, 2022. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Regional Green Development under China’s Environmental Decentralization System—Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Threshold Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Alexander Musaev & Andrey Makshanov & Dmitry Grigoriev, 2022. "Evolutionary Optimization of Control Strategies for Non-Stationary Immersion Environments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Haefner, Naomi & Wincent, Joakim & Parida, Vinit & Gassmann, Oliver, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda✰," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Chiarello, Filippo & Fantoni, Gualtiero & Hogarth, Terence & Giordano, Vito & Baltina, Liga & Spada, Irene, 2021. "Towards ESCO 4.0 – Is the European classification of skills in line with Industry 4.0? A text mining approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    18. Grabowski, Richard, 2013. "Agricultural distortions and structural change," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 17-25.
    19. Mozammel Huq & Michael Tribe, 2004. "Economic development in a changing globalized economy," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(7), pages 911-923.
    20. Rodrigo Marçal Gandia & Fabio Antonialli & Bruna Habib Cavazza & Arthur Miranda Neto & Danilo Alves de Lima & Joel Yutaka Sugano & Isabelle Nicolai & Andre Luiz Zambalde, 2019. "Autonomous vehicles: scientometric and bibliometric review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 9-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10934-:d:904229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.