IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10695-d899580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency of the Chinese Prefabricated Building Industry and Its Influencing Factors: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Zufeng Shang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Fenglai Wang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin 150090, China
    Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
    Key Lab Smart Prevention and Mitigation of Civil Engineering Disasters of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China)

  • Xu Yang

    (Harbin Institute of Technology, School of Civil Engineering, Harbin 150090, China)

Abstract

China is a world leader in capital construction. In the construction field, the shift toward prefabricated construction has become an important path for industrial transformation. This paper refers to the development of the prefabricated building industry in China, and uses input and output perspectives to examine its efficiency. It builds a data envelopment analysis model to evaluate the efficiency of the prefabricated building industry in China at both the micro and macro levels, and uses the Tobit model to empirically analyze the factors that influence this industry’s efficiency. It finds that the country’s prefabricated building industry has a moderate micro-level efficiency. This means that it is necessary to further rationalize industrial planning; strengthen technological innovation; and improve standardization, mechanization, and automation levels. At the macro level, China’s prefabricated buildings have a low industrial efficiency and remain at the initial stage of industrial development. A series of problems, such as small industrial scale and unsound policies, are restricting the industry’s rapid and efficient development. We propose several countermeasures and suggestions for the (micro- and macro-level) sustainable development of the prefabricated building industry in China, and anticipate that this will have implications for this industry’s worldwide development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zufeng Shang & Fenglai Wang & Xu Yang, 2022. "The Efficiency of the Chinese Prefabricated Building Industry and Its Influencing Factors: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10695-:d:899580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kidanemariam Berhe Hailu & Kaoru Tone, 2017. "Setting handicaps to industrial sectors in DEA illustrated by Ethiopian industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 248(1), pages 189-207, January.
    2. Zelenyuk, Valentin, 2015. "Aggregation of scale efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 269-277.
    3. Tomonari Yashiro, 2014. "Conceptual framework of the evolution and transformation of the idea of the industrialization of building in Japan," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 16-39, February.
    4. Wei Pan & Alistair Gibb & Andrew Dainty, 2007. "Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 183-194.
    5. Chunguang Chang & Mengyao Han, 2021. "Production Scheduling Optimization of Prefabricated Building Components Based on DDE Algorithm," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-11, February.
    6. Matthew Mitchell, 2002. "Technological Change and the Scale of Production," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 5(2), pages 477-488, April.
    7. Henriques, C.O. & Gouveia, C.M. & Tenente, M. & da Silva, P.P., 2022. "Employing Value-Based DEA in the eco-efficiency assessment of the electricity sector," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 826-844.
    8. Walheer, Barnabé, 2018. "Scale efficiency for multi-output cost minimizing producers: The case of the US electricity plants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 26-36.
    9. Barnabé Walheer, 2018. "Cost Malmquist productivity index: an output-specific approach for group comparison," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 79-94, February.
    10. Ali Ataullah & Tony Cockerill & Hang Le, 2004. "Financial liberalization and bank efficiency: a comparative analysis of India and Pakistan," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(17), pages 1915-1924.
    11. Tomikawa, Tadaaki & Goto, Mika, 2022. "Efficiency assessment of Japanese National Railways before and after privatization and divestiture using data envelopment analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 44-55.
    12. Giacalone, Massimiliano & Nissi, Eugenia & Cusatelli, Carlo, 2020. "Dynamic efficiency evaluation of Italian judicial system using DEA based Malmquist productivity indexes," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Hui Li & Kangyin Dong & Renjin Sun & Jintao Yu & Jinhong Xu, 2017. "Sustainability Assessment of Refining Enterprises Using a DEA-Based Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    14. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    15. Ján Dobrovič & Veronika Čabinová & Peter Gallo & Petra Partlová & Jan Váchal & Beáta Balogová & Jozef Orgonáš, 2021. "Application of the DEA Model in Tourism SMEs: An Empirical Study from Slovakia in the Context of Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Jia, Fei & Ma, Xiuying & Xu, Xiangyun & Xie, Lijuan, 2020. "The differential role of manufacturing and non-manufacturing TFP growth in economic growth," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 174-183.
    17. Page, John Jr., 1984. "Firm size and technical efficiency : Applications of production frontiers to Indian survey data," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1-2), pages 129-152.
    18. Xiaolin Zhai & Richard Reed & Anthony Mills, 2014. "Factors impeding the offsite production of housing construction in China: an investigation of current practice," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1-2), pages 40-52, February.
    19. Hermosilla, Manuel & Wu, Yufei, 2018. "Market size and innovation: The intermediary role of technology licensing," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 980-991.
    20. Michelli Barros & Manuel Galea & Víctor Leiva & Manoel Santos-Neto, 2018. "Generalized Tobit models: diagnostics and application in econometrics," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 145-167, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Houchao Sun & Yuwei Fang & Minggan Yin & Feiting Shi, 2023. "Research on the Restrictive Factors of Vigorous Promotion of Prefabricated Buildings in Yancheng under the Background of “Double Carbon”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Wang, Shiyan & Li, Chengjiang & Zhang, Wei & Sui, Jingyu & Negnevitsky, Michael, 2024. "Assessing the impact of prefabricated buildings on urban green total factor energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 297(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walheer, Barnabé, 2019. "Aggregating Farrell efficiencies with private and public inputs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1170-1177.
    2. Walheer, Barnabe & Hudik, Marek, 2019. "Reallocation of resources in multidivisional firms: A nonparametric approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 196-205.
    3. Barnabé Walheer, 2020. "Output, input, and undesirable output interconnections in data envelopment analysis: convexity and returns-to-scale," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 284(1), pages 447-467, January.
    4. Fadzlan Sufian & Fakarudin Kamarudin, 2014. "The impact of ownership structure on bank productivity and efficiency: Evidence from semi-parametric Malmquist Productivity Index," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Meryem Duygun Fethi & Mohamed Shaban & Thomas Weyman-Jones, 2009. "Liberalisation, privatisation and the productivity of Egyptian banks: a non-parametric approach," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 1143-1163, September.
    6. Riju Chaudhary & H. D. Arora, 2022. "Efficiency evaluation of public and nationalized Indian banks using data envelopment analysis," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(1), pages 469-478, February.
    7. Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz & Harms, Sören Guntram, 2019. "Performance comparison of management groups under centralised management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 845-854.
    8. K. Ravirajan & K.R. Shanmugam, 2021. "Efficiency of commercial banks in India after global financial crises," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(628), A), pages 65-82, Autumn.
    9. Anup Kumar Bhandari, 2010. "Global Crisis, Environment Volatility and Expansion of Tthe Indian Leather Industry," Working Papers id:2500, eSocialSciences.
    10. Barnabé Walheer, 2019. "Disaggregation for efficiency analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 137-151, June.
    11. Lei Jiang & Zhongfu Li & Long Li & Yunli Gao, 2018. "Constraints on the Promotion of Prefabricated Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1, July.
    12. Walheer, Barnabé, 2018. "Aggregation of metafrontier technology gap ratios: the case of European sectors in 1995–2015," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1013-1026.
    13. Léopold Simar & Valentin Zelenyuk, 2018. "Central Limit Theorems for Aggregate Efficiency," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 137-149, January.
    14. Reza Fallahnejad & Mohammad Reza Mozaffari & Peter Fernandes Wanke & Yong Tan, 2024. "Nash Bargaining Game Enhanced Global Malmquist Productivity Index for Cross-Productivity Index," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Yu, Sisi & Liu, Yanfeng & Wang, Dengjia & Bahaj, AbuBakr S. & Wu, Yue & Liu, Jiaping, 2021. "Review of thermal and environmental performance of prefabricated buildings: Implications to emission reductions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Vincent Mok & Godfrey Yeung & Zhaozhou Han & Zongzhang Li, 2010. "Export orientation and technical efficiency: clothing firms in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(7), pages 453-463.
    17. Anup Bhandari & Pradip Maiti, 2012. "Efficiency of the Indian leather firms: some results obtained using the two conventional methods," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 73-93, February.
    18. Abbas Mardani & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Khalil Md Nor & Seyed Meysam Khoshnava, 2018. "Data Envelopment Analysis in Energy and Environmental Economics: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art and Recent Development Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    19. Silva, Thiago Christiano & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda & Cajueiro, Daniel Oliveira & Dias, Marina Villas Boas, 2018. "Adequacy of deterministic and parametric frontiers to analyze the efficiency of Indian commercial banks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 506(C), pages 1016-1025.
    20. V.V. Spitsin & A. Mikhalchuk & Darko B. Vukovic & L.Y. Spitsina, 2023. "Technical Efficiency of High-Technology Industries in the Crisis: Evidence from Russia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 200-225, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10695-:d:899580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.