IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9809-d883706.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying Challenges for Clients in Adopting Sustainable Public Cloud Computing

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Janas Khan

    (Department of Computer Science & Informational Technology, Sarhad University of Science & Informational Technology, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan)

  • Fasee Ullah

    (Department of Computer Science & Informational Technology, Sarhad University of Science & Informational Technology, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Imran

    (Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (ICS/IT), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan)

  • Jahangir Khan

    (Department of Computer Science & Informational Technology, Sarhad University of Science & Informational Technology, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan)

  • Arshad Khan

    (Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (ICS/IT), The University of Agriculture, Peshawar 25120, Pakistan)

  • Ahmed S. AlGhamdi

    (Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

  • Sultan S. Alshamrani

    (Department of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Sustainable Cloud Computing is the modern era’s most popular technology. It is improving daily, offering billions of people sustainable services. Currently, three deployment models are available: (1) public, (2) private, and (3) hybrid cloud. Recently, each deployment model has undergone extensive research. However, relatively little work has been carried out regarding clients’ adoption of sustainable public cloud computing (PCC). We are particularly interested in this area because PCC is widely used worldwide. As evident from the literature, there is no up-to-date systematic literature review (SLR) on the challenges clients confront in PCC. There is a gap that needs urgent attention in this area. We produced an SLR by examining the existing cloud computing models in this research. We concentrated on the challenges encountered by clients during user adoption of a sustainable PCC. We uncovered a total of 29 obstacles that clients confront when adopting sustainable PCC. In 2020, 18 of the 29 challenges were reported. This demonstrates the tremendous threat that PCC still faces. Nineteen of these are considered critical challenges to us. We consider a challenge a critical challenge if its occurrence in the final selected sample of the paper is greater than 20%. These challenges will negatively affect client adoption in PCC. Furthermore, we performed three different analyses on the critical challenges. Our analysis may indicate that these challenges are significant for all the continents. These challenges vary with the passage of time and with the venue of publication. Our results will assist the client’s organization in understanding the issue. Furthermore, it will also help the vendor’s organization determine the potential solutions to the highlighted challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Janas Khan & Fasee Ullah & Muhammad Imran & Jahangir Khan & Arshad Khan & Ahmed S. AlGhamdi & Sultan S. Alshamrani, 2022. "Identifying Challenges for Clients in Adopting Sustainable Public Cloud Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9809-:d:883706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9809/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9809/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seunghwan Myeong & Jaehyun Park & Minhyung Lee, 2022. "Research Models and Methodologies on the Smart City: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Seok-Keun Yoo & Bo-Young Kim, 2018. "A Decision-Making Model for Adopting a Cloud Computing System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiran, Kamal Kant & Dadhich, Manish, 2024. "Predicting the core determinants of cloud-edge computing adoption (CECA) for sustainable development in the higher education institutions of Africa: A high order SEM-ANN analytical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Osama Abied & Othman Ibrahim & Siti Nuur-Ila Mat Kamal & Ibrahim M. Alfadli & Weam M. Binjumah & Norafida Ithnin & Maged Nasser, 2022. "Probing Determinants Affecting Intention to Adopt Cloud Technology in E-Government Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-29, November.
    3. Dongdong Zhang & Cunhao Rong & Hui Hwang Goh & Hui Liu & Xiang Li & Hongyu Zhu & Thomas Wu, 2023. "Reform of Electrical Engineering Undergraduate Teaching and the Curriculum System in the Context of the Energy Internet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-37, March.
    4. Darell Edmond & Vijay Prakash & Lalit Garg & Seema Bawa, 2022. "Adoption of Cloud Services in Central Banks: Hindering Factors and the Recommendations for Way Forward," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 11(2), pages 123-143.
    5. Han Lai & Huchang Liao & Jonas Šaparauskas & Audrius Banaitis & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Abdullah Al-Barakati, 2020. "Sustainable Cloud Service Provider Development by a Z-Number-Based DNMA Method with Gini-Coefficient-Based Weight Determination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Salem Badawi & Monica Drăgoicea, 2023. "Towards a Value Co-Creation Process in Collaborative Environments for TVET Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Monika Wawer & Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow, 2022. "Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Songling Chang & Melanie Kay Smith, 2023. "Residents’ Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Paweł Modrzyński & Robert Karaszewski, 2022. "Urban Energy Management—A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-17, October.
    10. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Hassan, Rohail & Escobar, Octavio, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 283-314.
    11. Johannes Enzmann & Marc Ringel, 2020. "Reducing Road Transport Emissions in Europe: Investigating A Demand Side Driven Approach †," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-31, September.
    12. Sorin-George Toma & Cătălin Grădinaru & Oana-Simona Hudea & Andra Modreanu, 2023. "Perceptions and Attitudes of Generation Z Students towards the Responsible Management of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-40, September.
    13. Yuquan Meng & Yuhang Yang & Haseung Chung & Pil-Ho Lee & Chenhui Shao, 2018. "Enhancing Sustainability and Energy Efficiency in Smart Factories: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-28, December.
    14. Assunta Di Vaio & Flavio Boccia & Loris Landriani & Rosa Palladino, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence in the Agri-Food System: Rethinking Sustainable Business Models in the COVID-19 Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Agata Sudolska & Andrzej Lis & Róża Błaś, 2019. "Cloud Computing Research Profiling: Mapping Scholarly Community and Identifying Thematic Boundaries of the Field," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    16. Jana Stofkova & Matej Krejnus & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Vladimira Binasova, 2022. "Use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Selected Methods in the Managerial Decision-Making Process in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Manideep Yenugula & Shankha Shubhra Goswami & Subramaniam Kaliappan & Rengaraj Saravanakumar & Areej Alasiry & Mehrez Marzougui & Abdulaziz AlMohimeed & Ahmed Elaraby, 2023. "Analyzing the Critical Parameters for Implementing Sustainable AI Cloud System in an IT Industry Using AHP-ISM-MICMAC Integrated Hybrid MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-35, August.
    18. Chang Hee Yoon & Francis Joseph Costello & Cheong Kim, 2019. "Assisting Sustainable Entrepreneurial Activities Through the Analysis of Mobile IT Services’ Success and Failure Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    19. Hanifa Shah, 2023. "Beyond Smart: How ICT Is Enabling Sustainable Cities of the Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9809-:d:883706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.