IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9765-d882997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing Public Trust in Open Government Data

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Almuqrin

    (Department of Information Science, College of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ibrahim Mutambik

    (Department of Information Science, College of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Abdulaziz Alomran

    (Department of Information Science, College of Arts, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jeffrey Gauthier

    (School of Business and Economics, State University of New York at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901, USA)

  • Majed Abusharhah

    (Ministry of Education, Jazan 82614, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Open government data (OGD) involves exposing government data to the public, guided by the values of clarity, accountability, honesty, and integrity. This study investigates the impact of the perceived quality of data, systems, and services on citizens’ trust in OGD, with the information systems success model as the theoretical framework. A questionnaire was delivered electronically to reach OGD users around the world. A total of 358 complete responses were obtained, representing 63.58% of all responses. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the hypothesized relationships between constructs based on users’ responses. The findings confirm the impact of data, system, and service quality on citizens’ perceived trust in OGD. Moreover, perceived system and service quality had a positive impact on perceived data quality, and perceived service quality had a positive effect on perceived system quality. These findings indicate that OGD service quality affects data and system quality, making it the most fundamental motivator of citizens’ trust in OGD. This highlights the role of open government platforms in developing public services and providing users with complete and correct data, feedback tools, and data visualization.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Almuqrin & Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdulaziz Alomran & Jeffrey Gauthier & Majed Abusharhah, 2022. "Factors Influencing Public Trust in Open Government Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9765-:d:882997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9765/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9765/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marwa Ghanem & Ibrahim Elshaer & Alaa Shaker, 2020. "The Successful Adoption of IS in the Tourism Public Sector: The Mediating Effect of Employees’ Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Maxat Kassen, 2019. "Open data and e-government – related or competing ecosystems: a paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 552-578, July.
    3. Sakiko Kanbara & Rajib Shaw, 2021. "Disaster Risk Reduction Regime in Japan: An Analysis in the Perspective of Open Data, Open Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Taye Demissie Beshi & Ranvinderjit Kaur, 2020. "Public Trust in Local Government: Explaining the Role of Good Governance Practices," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 337-350, June.
    5. Sylwia Borkowska & Krzysztof Pokonieczny, 2022. "Analysis of OpenStreetMap Data Quality for Selected Counties in Poland in Terms of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, March.
    6. Xiaohua Zhu & Mark Antony Freeman, 2019. "An evaluation of U.S. municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 70(1), pages 27-37, January.
    7. William H. DeLone & Ephraim R. McLean, 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 3(1), pages 60-95, March.
    8. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin & John Lee & Justin Zuopeng Zhang & Abdulaziz Alomran & Taha Omar & Ahmad Floos & Abdullah Homadi, 2021. "Usability of the G7 Open Government Data Portals and Lessons Learned," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Deo Donald Shao & Stuti Saxena, 2019. "Barriers to Open Government Data (OGD) initiative in Tanzania: Stakeholders’ perspectives," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 470-485, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin & Fawaz Alharbi & Majed Abusharhah, 2023. "How to Encourage Public Engagement in Smart City Development—Learning from Saudi Arabia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Ibrahim Mutambik & John Lee & Abdullah Almuqrin & Abdulrhman Alkhanifer & Mohammed Baihan, 2023. "Gulf Cooperation Council Countries and Urbanisation: Are Open Government Data Portals Helping?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Abdo Albaom & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rusli Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Nur Anita Yunikawati & Magistyo Purboyo Priambodo & Mohammed Saleh Nusari & Dhakir Abbas Ali, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Personal Innovativeness in Tourists’ Intention to Use Web 3.0 Based on Updated Information Systems Success Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-35, October.
    2. Dung Minh Nguyen & Yen-Ting Helena Chiu & Huy Duc Le, 2021. "Determinants of Continuance Intention towards Banks’ Chatbot Services in Vietnam: A Necessity for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Xiaoxu Dong & Huawei Zhao & Tiancai Li, 2022. "The Role of Live-Streaming E-Commerce on Consumers’ Purchasing Intention regarding Green Agricultural Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    5. Yan Zhang & Ciaran B. Trace, 2022. "The quality of health and wellness self‐tracking data: A consumer perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(6), pages 879-891, June.
    6. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    7. Tsung Teng Chen, 2012. "The development and empirical study of a literature review aiding system," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 92(1), pages 105-116, July.
    8. Abdesamad Zouine & Pierre Fenies, 2014. "The Critical Success Factors Of The ERP System Project: A Meta-Analysis Methodology," Post-Print hal-01419785, HAL.
    9. Khleef A. Alkhawaldeh, 2021. "Institutional Governance Practices in Jordan Government Units," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 52-65.
    10. Proserpio, Luigi & Magni, Massimo, 2012. "Teaching without the teacher? Building a learning environment through computer simulations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 99-105.
    11. Chen-Yuan Chen & Bih-Yaw Shih & Shih-Hsien Yu, 2012. "Disaster prevention and reduction for exploring teachers’ technology acceptance using a virtual reality system and partial least squares techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(3), pages 1217-1231, July.
    12. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    13. Yoonsun Oh & Jungsuk Oh, 2017. "A critical incident approach to consumer response in the smartphone market: product, service and contents," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 577-597, August.
    14. Blackburn, Nivea & Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse & Hooper, Val, 2014. "A dialogical framing of AIS–SEA design," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 83-101.
    15. Landrum, Hollis & Prybutok, Victor R., 2004. "A service quality and success model for the information service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 628-642, August.
    16. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou & Willem-Paul Brinkman & Banita Lal, 2010. "Examining the influence of service quality and secondary influence on the behavioural intention to change internet service provider," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 207-217, April.
    17. Aladwani, Adel M. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 261-272.
    18. Ko, Eun-Jung & Kim, A-Hyun & Kim, Sang-Soo, 2021. "Toward the understanding of the appropriation of ICT-based Smart-work and its impact on performance in organizations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Safdar, Sarah & Ren, Minglun & Chudhery, Muhammad Adnan Zahid & Huo, Jiazhen & Rehman, Hakeem-Ur & Rafique, Raza, 2022. "Using cloud-based virtual learning environments to mitigate increasing disparity in urban-rural academic competence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    20. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9765-:d:882997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.