IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9701-d882055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Encouraging a Modal Shift to Passenger Railway Transportation: A Case Study in Adaptable Rolling Stock Interior Design

Author

Listed:
  • Jan-jaap Moerman

    (Design, Production and Management Department, University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Seppe van Heusden

    (Vheus, Gildenring 2, 3981 Bunnik, The Netherlands)

  • Brigitte Matheussen

    (Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Laan van Puntenburg 100, 3511 Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Alberto Martinetti

    (Design, Production and Management Department, University of Twente, 7522 Enschede, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Continued urbanization continues to pose one of the greatest challenges to the environmental, economic and social sustainability of society. The modal split between transport modes has remained relatively unchanged in recent decades. This suggests that the level of private car use will lead to even more congestion in urban areas. Therefore, a modal shift from private to public transport should be further encouraged. One of the decisive quality characteristics for preferring public transport over private car use, such as passenger railway transportation, is the level of comfort. However, one of the main challenges for railway operators is the change in demand for capacity during peak hours and the demand for comfort during off-peak hours. The purpose of this study is to investigate the applicability of adaptable design in rolling stock interior to facilitate adaptations using case study research. The proposed design concept was evaluated and compared with current coach interior configurations using grey relational analysis. The case results showed that the design concept was adaptive by providing more options to meet the different needs of comfort and capacity. In addition, three new guidelines were identified that can generally serve as functional guidelines in the development of more adaptable assets in use to further encourage a modal shift.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan-jaap Moerman & Seppe van Heusden & Brigitte Matheussen & Alberto Martinetti, 2022. "Encouraging a Modal Shift to Passenger Railway Transportation: A Case Study in Adaptable Rolling Stock Interior Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9701-:d:882055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Åse Jevinger & Jan A. Persson, 2019. "Potentials of Context-Aware Travel Support during Unplanned Public Transport Disturbances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    3. Elżbieta Macioszek & Agata Kurek, 2021. "The Analysis of the Factors Determining the Choice of Park and Ride Facility Using a Multinomial Logit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariusz Korzeń & Maciej Kruszyna, 2023. "Modified Ant Colony Optimization as a Means for Evaluating the Variants of the City Railway Underground Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Tyson R. Browning & Eric C. Honour, 2008. "Measuring the life‐cycle value of enduring systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 187-202, September.
    3. Margarita Bagamanova & Miguel Mujica Mota & Vittorio Di Vito, 2022. "Exploring the Efficiency of Future Multimodal Networks: A Door-to-Door Case in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Shiqian Ji & Jiaming Zhong & Zhaocheng He, 2022. "A Bus Subsidy Scheme Design Model Considering Competition between Bus Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    5. Eun Suk Suh & Michael R. Furst & Kenneth J. Mihalyov & Olivier de Weck, 2010. "Technology infusion for complex systems: A framework and case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 186-203, June.
    6. Maria Cieśla & Elżbieta Macioszek, 2022. "The Perspective Projects Promoting Sustainable Mobility by Active Travel to School on the Example of the Southern Poland Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Alberto Sols & Javier Romero & Robert Cloutier, 2012. "Performance‐based logistics and technology refreshment programs: Bridging the operational‐life performance capability gap in the Spanish F‐100 frigates," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 422-432, December.
    8. Alessandro Golkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2014. "A Framework for Space Systems Architecture under Stakeholder Objectives Ambiguity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 479-502, December.
    9. Carola Leone & Laura Sturaro & Giacomo Geroli & Michela Longo & Wahiba Yaici, 2021. "Design and Implementation of an Electric Skibus Line in North Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Panyu Tang & Mahdi Aghaabbasi & Mujahid Ali & Amin Jan & Abdeliazim Mustafa Mohamed & Abdullah Mohamed, 2022. "How Sustainable Is People’s Travel to Reach Public Transit Stations to Go to Work? A Machine Learning Approach to Reveal Complex Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Carolina Busco & Felipe González & Nelson Lillo, 2022. "Safety, Gender, and the Public Transport System in Santiago, Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Benedict Bender & Clementine Bertheau & Tim Körppen & Hannah Lauppe & Norbert Gronau, 2022. "A proposal for future data organization in enterprise systems—an analysis of established database approaches," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 441-494, September.
    13. Qigang Zhu & Yifan Liu & Ming Liu & Shuaishuai Zhang & Guangyang Chen & Hao Meng, 2021. "Intelligent Planning and Research on Urban Traffic Congestion," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    14. Sungchul Kim & Ronald Giachetti & Sangsung Park, 2018. "Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank’s Powerpack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Mehdi Ranjbar‐Bourani & Richard de Neufville, 2015. "Improving the Lifecycle Performance of Engineering Projects with Flexible Strategies: Example of On‐Shore LNG Production Design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 253-268, May.
    16. Miranda Reed-Grice & Brandon E. Ross, 2024. "Application of the Black–Scholes Financial Model to Support Adaptability as a Sustainability Strategy for Buildings: A Case Study of an Adaptable Campus Parking Garage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Maciej Kruszyna & Jacek Makuch, 2023. "Mobility Nodes as an Extension of the Idea of Transfer Nodes—Solutions for Smaller Rail Stations with an Example from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, January.
    18. Jessica Ryan & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "Leveraging Variability Modeling Techniques for Architecture Trade Studies and Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 10-25, March.
    19. Eun Suk Suh & Noemi Chiriac & Katja Hölttä‐Otto, 2015. "Seeing Complex System through Different Lenses: Impact of Decomposition Perspective on System Architecture Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 229-240, May.
    20. Avner Engel & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Advancing Architecture Options Theory: Six Industrial Case Studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 396-414, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9701-:d:882055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.