IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v15y2012i4p422-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance‐based logistics and technology refreshment programs: Bridging the operational‐life performance capability gap in the Spanish F‐100 frigates

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Sols
  • Javier Romero
  • Robert Cloutier

Abstract

Many large and complex systems have extended operational lives. Examples of such systems include the oil and gas drilling systems, defense systems, and air traffic control systems. A growing concern for many users is the difference between actual and intended system performance during the operational life. An understanding of the root causes of that gap, known as performance capability gap, is required if appropriate measures are to be taken. This paper explores the main reasons for the existence of the performance capability gap and suggests the combination of performance‐based logistics and technology refreshment programs as a very effective and efficient remedial strategy. The paper examines the Spanish F‐100 frigate to illustrate actual application of these strategies. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Syst Eng 15

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Sols & Javier Romero & Robert Cloutier, 2012. "Performance‐based logistics and technology refreshment programs: Bridging the operational‐life performance capability gap in the Spanish F‐100 frigates," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 422-432, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:422-432
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.21207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21207
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.21207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tyson R. Browning & Eric C. Honour, 2008. "Measuring the life‐cycle value of enduring systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 187-202, September.
    2. Eun Suk Suh & Michael R. Furst & Kenneth J. Mihalyov & Olivier de Weck, 2010. "Technology infusion for complex systems: A framework and case study," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 186-203, June.
    3. Alessandro Golkar & Edward F. Crawley, 2014. "A Framework for Space Systems Architecture under Stakeholder Objectives Ambiguity," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), pages 479-502, December.
    4. Benedict Bender & Clementine Bertheau & Tim Körppen & Hannah Lauppe & Norbert Gronau, 2022. "A proposal for future data organization in enterprise systems—an analysis of established database approaches," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 441-494, September.
    5. Sungchul Kim & Ronald Giachetti & Sangsung Park, 2018. "Real Options Analysis for Acquisition of New Technology: A Case Study of Korea K2 Tank’s Powerpack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Michel‐Alexandre Cardin & Mehdi Ranjbar‐Bourani & Richard de Neufville, 2015. "Improving the Lifecycle Performance of Engineering Projects with Flexible Strategies: Example of On‐Shore LNG Production Design," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 253-268, May.
    7. Miranda Reed-Grice & Brandon E. Ross, 2024. "Application of the Black–Scholes Financial Model to Support Adaptability as a Sustainability Strategy for Buildings: A Case Study of an Adaptable Campus Parking Garage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Jessica Ryan & Shahram Sarkani & Thomas Mazzuchi, 2014. "Leveraging Variability Modeling Techniques for Architecture Trade Studies and Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 10-25, March.
    9. Eun Suk Suh & Noemi Chiriac & Katja Hölttä‐Otto, 2015. "Seeing Complex System through Different Lenses: Impact of Decomposition Perspective on System Architecture Analysis," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 229-240, May.
    10. Jan-jaap Moerman & Seppe van Heusden & Brigitte Matheussen & Alberto Martinetti, 2022. "Encouraging a Modal Shift to Passenger Railway Transportation: A Case Study in Adaptable Rolling Stock Interior Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Avner Engel & Yoram Reich, 2015. "Advancing Architecture Options Theory: Six Industrial Case Studies," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 396-414, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:422-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.