IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9557-d879547.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Life Cycle Assessment of a Circularity Case Study Using Additive Manufacturing

Author

Listed:
  • Joana R. Gouveia

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sara M. Pinto

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sara Campos

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • João R. Matos

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Catarina Costa

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Thiago Assis Dutra

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Sílvia Esteves

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Luís Oliveira

    (INEGI—Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

Abstract

Currently, considering the rising concern in climate change, there is a clear necessity for technologies that can prolong the useful life of products through the ability to repair, re-manufacture and refurbish. As such, additive manufacturing has been a subject of research due to its design and resource consumption capabilities. However, there is a lack of more detailed information regarding environmental performances, especially in Directed Energy Deposition technology. The present paper presents a life-cycle assessment of the production and use of Directed Energy Deposition, making use of foreground data to build a life-cycle inventory and quantify the potential impacts. The equipment is analyzed for its refurbishment capabilities on an obsolete mold, and compared with the environmental impact of producing a new mold through conventional technology. The compiled inventory with detailed and primary information will enrich the current literature on this technology. The impact results show that the robot, deposition table and security cell are the most relevant subsystems for the system production impacts. In the refurbishment analysis, the refurbished mold part has lower impacts than the conventionally produced, thus showing that there is great potential in using additive manufacturing for circular economy loops.

Suggested Citation

  • Joana R. Gouveia & Sara M. Pinto & Sara Campos & João R. Matos & Catarina Costa & Thiago Assis Dutra & Sílvia Esteves & Luís Oliveira, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment of a Circularity Case Study Using Additive Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-44, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9557-:d:879547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felipe Cerdas & Max Juraschek & Sebastian Thiede & Christoph Herrmann, 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment of 3D Printed Products in a Distributed Manufacturing System," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(S1), pages 80-93, November.
    2. Joana R. Gouveia & Sara M. Pinto & Sara Campos & João R. Matos & João Sobral & Sílvia Esteves & Luís Oliveira, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of Additive Manufacturing Repair Processes in the Mold Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asma Mecheter & Faris Tarlochan & Murat Kucukvar, 2023. "A Review of Conventional versus Additive Manufacturing for Metals: Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Asghari, M. & Afshari, H. & Jaber, M.Y. & Searcy, C., 2024. "Learning and forgetting interactions within a collaborative human-centric manufacturing network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(3), pages 977-991.
    3. Biman Darshana Hettiarachchi & Stefan Seuring & Marcus Brandenburg, 2022. "Industry 4.0-driven operations and supply chains for the circular economy: a bibliometric analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 858-878, December.
    4. Hossein Eskandari Sabzi & Pedro E. J. Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, 2023. "Sustainable Powder-Based Additive Manufacturing Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Farrukh, Clare & Holgado, Maria, 2020. "Integrating sustainable value thinking into technology forecasting: A configurable toolset for early stage technology assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Colin Reiff & Matthias Buser & Thomas Betten & Volkher Onuseit & Max Hoßfeld & Daniel Wehner & Oliver Riedel, 2021. "A Process-Planning Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    7. Mario Santiago-Herrera & Jesús Ibáñez & Marco De Pamphilis & Jesús Manuel Alegre & Juan Antonio Tamayo-Ramos & Sonia Martel-Martín & Rocío Barros, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment and Cost Analysis of the Production of Ti6Al4V-TiC Metal–Matrix Composite Powder by High-Energy Ball Milling and Ti6Al4V Powder by Gas Atomization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Oliver Kunze & Fabian Frommer, 2021. "The Matrix vs. The Fifth Element—Assessing Future Scenarios of Urban Transport from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    9. Simonetto, Marco & Sgarbossa, Fabio & Battini, Daria & Govindan, Kannan, 2022. "Closed loop supply chains 4.0: From risks to benefits through advanced technologies. A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    10. Hettiarachchi, Biman Darshana & Brandenburg, Marcus & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Connecting additive manufacturing to circular economy implementation strategies: Links, contingencies and causal loops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    11. Núñez-Merino, Miguel & Maqueira-Marín, Juan Manuel & Moyano-Fuentes, José & Castaño-Moraga, Carlos Alberto, 2022. "Industry 4.0 and supply chain. A Systematic Science Mapping analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    12. Matt Sinclair & Leila Sheldrick & Mariale Moreno & Emma Dewberry, 2018. "Consumer Intervention Mapping—A Tool for Designing Future Product Strategies within Circular Product Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9557-:d:879547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.