IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9195-d872905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intangibles, Firm Performance, and CEO Characteristics: Spotlight on the EU Electricity and Gas Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Curea

    (Doctoral School of Economics and Business Administration, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza University” of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

  • Marilena Mironiuc

    (Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza University” of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

  • Maria Carmen Huian

    (Department of Accounting, Business Information Systems and Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, “Alexandru Ioan Cuza University” of Iași, 700506 Iași, Romania)

Abstract

The transition from the industrial economy to the knowledge-based economy has changed the status quo, and consequently, intangibles have gained traction in the scientific discourse of recent decades. The paper aims to scrutinise, econometrically, the nexus between intangibles and firm performance and the moderating role of CEO duality and CEO gender. Capital-intensive industries are largely overlooked by previous studies, which prompted us to explore the electricity and gas industry. The analysis is based on a longitudinal dataset of EU-listed companies and employs a quantitative approach to study the causal relationships between intangibles, firm performance, and CEO characteristics. Results demonstrate that intangible assets are a stepping stone to better financial and market performance, which endorses the resource-based view. Today’s social and cultural milieu sees gender diversity in a positive light. Consonant with the upper echelons theory, the study finds that CEO gender positively impacts the intangibles–firm performance relationship. The hypothesised prejudicial effect of CEO duality, postulated by the agency theory, is only partially supported. Managers and policymakers are advised to pay particular attention to intangibles and science-driven projects to augment corporate performance. Creating a diversity-friendly culture is also of paramount importance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Curea & Marilena Mironiuc & Maria Carmen Huian, 2022. "Intangibles, Firm Performance, and CEO Characteristics: Spotlight on the EU Electricity and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9195-:d:872905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Surya Mulyadi & Rosinta Ria Panggabean, 2017. "Intellectual capital reporting: case study of high intellectual capital corporations in Indonesia," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10.
    2. Teirlinck, Peter, 2017. "Configurations of strategic R&D decisions and financial performance in small-sized and medium-sized firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 55-65.
    3. Jiang, Crystal X. & Yang, Qin & Li, Sali & Wang, Yong, 2011. "The moderating effect of foreign direct investment intensity on local firms' intangible resources investment and performance implications: A case from China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 291-302.
    4. de Villiers, Charl & Sharma, Umesh, 2020. "A critical reflection on the future of financial, intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Bejinaru Ruxandra, 2017. "Knowledge strategies aiming to improve the intellectual capital of universities," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 500-523, September.
    6. De Vita, Luisa & Mari, Michela & Poggesi, Sara, 2014. "Women entrepreneurs in and from developing countries: Evidences from the literature," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 451-460.
    7. Cristina PRECOB & Marilena MIRONIUC, 2016. "The Influence of Reporting Intangible Capital on the Performance of Romanian Companies," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(133), pages 103-103, January.
    8. Faheem Aslam & Paulo Ferreira & Haider Ali & Ana Ercília José, 2022. "Application of Multifractal Analysis in Estimating the Reaction of Energy Markets to Geopolitical Acts and Threats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Luca Flabbi & Mario Macis & Andrea Moro & Fabiano Schivardi, 2019. "Do Female Executives Make a Difference? The Impact of Female Leadership on Gender Gaps and Firm Performance," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 129(622), pages 2390-2423.
    10. Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Elena-Alexandra Gorgos & Alexandru Mihai Ghigiu & Monica Pătruț, 2019. "Bridging Intellectual Capital and SMEs Internationalization through the Lens of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    12. Costa-Campi, M.T. & Duch-Brown, N. & García-Quevedo, J., 2014. "R&D drivers and obstacles to innovation in the energy industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 20-30.
    13. Khan, Walayet A. & Vieito, João Paulo, 2013. "Ceo gender and firm performance," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 55-66.
    14. Nemiraja Jadiyappa & Pavana Jyothi & Bhanu Sireesha & Leila Emily Hickman, 2019. "CEO gender, firm performance and agency costs: evidence from India," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 46(2), pages 482-495, March.
    15. Haider Ali & Faheem Aslam & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "Modeling Dynamic Multifractal Efficiency of US Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    16. Gamze Sart & Mehmet Hilmi Ozkaya & Yilmaz Bayar, 2022. "Education, Financial Development, and Primary Energy Consumption: An Empirical Analysis for BRICS Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    17. Beattie, Vivien & Smith, Sarah Jane, 2013. "Value creation and business models: Refocusing the intellectual capital debate," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 243-254.
    18. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:583 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Paz Rico & Bernardí Cabrer-Borrás & María Mar Benavides-Espinosa, 2020. "Intangible capital and business productivity in the hotel industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 691-707, June.
    20. Uribe, Jorge M. & Mosquera-López, Stephania & Arenas, Oscar J., 2022. "Assessing the relationship between electricity and natural gas prices in European markets in times of distress," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    21. Villalonga, Belen, 2004. "Intangible resources, Tobin's q, and sustainability of performance differences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 205-230, June.
    22. Tommaso Pucci & Christian Simoni & Lorenzo Zanni, 2015. "Measuring the relationship between marketing assets, intellectual capital and firm performance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 589-616, August.
    23. Marina Resta, 2004. "Multifractal analysis of Power Markets. Some empirical evidence," Econometrics 0410002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    24. Guo, Yaoqi & Shi, Fengyuan & Yu, Zhuling & Yao, Shanshan & Zhang, Hongwei, 2022. "Asymmetric multifractality in China’s energy market based on improved asymmetric multifractal cross-correlation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 594(C).
    25. Allam Mohammed Hamdan & Amina Mohammed Buallay & Bahaaeddin Ahmed Alareeni, 2017. "The moderating role of corporate governance on the relationship between intellectual capital efficiency and firm's performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 295-318.
    26. Tatiana Garanina & Henri Hussinki & Johannes Dumay, 2021. "Accounting for intangibles and intellectual capital: a literature review from 2000 to 2020," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5111-5140, December.
    27. Patel, Pankaj C. & Guedes, Maria João & Soares, Nuno & da Conceição Gonçalves, Vítor, 2018. "Strength of the association between R&D volatility and firm growth: The roles of corporate governance and tangible asset volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 282-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tingting Hu & Kun You & Char-Lee Lok, 2025. "State ownership, political connection and ESG performance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 1-33, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisabeth Albertini, 2019. "Integrated reporting: an exploratory study of French companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 513-535, June.
    2. Concetta Castiglione & Davide Infante & Janna Smirnova, 2022. "Do female managers perform better? Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 2194-2209, April.
    3. Tutun Mukherjee & Som Sankar Sen, 2022. "Impact of CEO attributes on corporate reputation, financial performance, and corporate sustainable growth: evidence from India," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-50, December.
    4. Opoku, Eric Evans Osei & Kufuor, Nana Kwabena & Manu, Sylvester Adasi, 2021. "Gender, electricity access, renewable energy consumption and energy efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Paola Belingheri & Filippo Chiarello & Andrea Fronzetti Colladon & Paola Rovelli, 2021. "Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicatorr," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Silvana Revellino & Jan Mouritsen, 2024. "Intellectual capital, innovation and the bushy form of knowledge capitalisation," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 957-984, December.
    7. Dah, Mustafa A. & Jizi, Mohammad I. & Kebbe, Reem, 2020. "CEO gender and managerial entrenchment," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Nazliben, Kamil K. & Renneboog, Luc & Uduwalage, Emil, 2023. "CEO social power, board inclusiveness, and corporate performance after ethnic conflicts," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    9. Monika Barak & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2023. "Investigating the Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Sustainable Financial Performance of Private Sector Banks in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Uduwalage, Emil, 2022. "Essays on corporate governance in Sri Lanka," Other publications TiSEM 9f4bd99f-e55d-471a-8aa1-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. María José Ibáñez & Felipe Vásquez Lavin & Roberto D. Ponce Oliva, 2023. "Female Underperformance Hypothesis Revisited: Methodological Review and Empirical Testing," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    12. Silvia Iacuzzi & Rubens Pauluzzo, 2024. "Looking for missing outcomes: accounting for intellectual capital and value creation in ecosystems," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(4), pages 1117-1149, December.
    13. Veena L. Brown & Erica E. Harris, 2023. "The Association of Female Leaders with Donations and Operating Margin in Nonprofit Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 223-243, June.
    14. Nuradhi Kalpani Jayasiri & Sriyalatha Kumarasinghe & Rakesh Pandey, 2023. "12 years of integrated reporting: A review of research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2187-2243, June.
    15. Hamelin, Anaïs & Lefebvre, Vivien & Weill, Laurent, 2022. "No debt no performance? CEO gender matters," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. De Amicis, Chiara & Falconieri, Sonia & Tastan, Mesut, 2021. "Sentiment analysis and gender differences in earnings conference calls," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    17. Shahid Ali & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Junfeng Jiang & Ramiz Ur Rehman & Fizzah Malik & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad, 2022. "“How†and “When†CEO Duality Matter? Case of a Developing Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    18. He, Qiuqin & Guijarro-Garcia, Maria & Costa-Climent, Juan, 2022. "Impact of knowledge-based capital on firm productivity: The contingent effect of ownership," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 85-94.
    19. , Aisdl, 2021. "The Impact of CEOs’ Gender on Organisational Efficiency in the Public Sector: Evidence from the English NHS," OSF Preprints mhcxv, Center for Open Science.
    20. Gema Gutierrez-Romero & Antonio Blanco-Oliver & Mª Teresa Montero-Romero & Mariano Carbonero-Ruz, 2021. "The Impact of CEOs’ Gender on Organisational Efficiency in the Public Sector: Evidence from the English NHS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9195-:d:872905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.