IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v133y2016i14p103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Reporting Intangible Capital on the Performance of Romanian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina PRECOB

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Marilena MIRONIUC

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to identify the correlations between intangible capital and organisational performance, for the Romanian companies quoted in the Bucharest Stock Exchange, BSE section. Intangible capital was computed based on 13 criteria grouped into three components: human capital, relational capital, and innovation, and the financial performance of the company was studied through the return on assets (ROA), the return on equity (ROE), and the economic return (Re). In this article, the financial performance for Romanian companies is reflected by the goodwill, computed as the difference between the market capitalization and the net accounting asset of an entity, as well as by the market to book value (M/BV- the ratio between the market capitalization and the net accounting asset of the company). The article also investigates the existence of a correlation between the intangible capital of Romanian companies and the auditor contracted to audit the annual financial statements. The results of research show that between intangible capital and the positive goodwill of the studied companies, on the one hand, and the economic return, respectively the market to book value, on the other hand, there are direct correlations. At the same time, the value of intangible capital is, statistically, significantly higher in companies whose financial statements are audited by Big4 auditors and in companies that record profit.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina PRECOB & Marilena MIRONIUC, 2016. "The Influence of Reporting Intangible Capital on the Performance of Romanian Companies," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(133), pages 103-103, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:133:y:2016:i:14:p:103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_2485.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu-Shan Chen, 2008. "The Positive Effect of Green Intellectual Capital on Competitive Advantages of Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 271-286, February.
    2. Lev, B & Zarowin, P, 1999. "The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 353-385.
    3. Brown, Stephen & Lo, Kin & Lys, Thomas, 1999. "Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 83-115, December.
    4. Ester Oliveras & Yulia Kasperskaya, 2004. "Reporting intellectual capital in Spain," Economics Working Papers 781, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    5. Claudiu-Marian Gruian, 2011. "The Influence Of Intellectual Capital On Romanian Companies' Financial Performance," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(13), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihaela Curea & Marilena Mironiuc & Maria Carmen Huian, 2022. "Intangibles, Firm Performance, and CEO Characteristics: Spotlight on the EU Electricity and Gas Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Core, John E. & Guay, Wayne R. & Buskirk, Andrew Van, 2003. "Market valuations in the New Economy: an investigation of what has changed," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 43-67, January.
    2. Rajgopal, Shiva & Venkatachalam, Mohan, 2011. "Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 1-20.
    3. Peterson K. Ozili, 2019. "Bank loan loss provisions, risk-taking and bank intangibles," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(1), pages 21-39.
    4. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    5. Lam, Kevin C.K. & Sami, Heibatollah & Zhou, Haiyan, 2013. "Changes in the value relevance of accounting information over time: Evidence from the emerging market of China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 123-135.
    6. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:126-151 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Anna Maria Biscotti & Eugenio D’Amico, 2016. "Theoretical foundation of IC disclosure strategies in high-tech industries," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, February.
    8. Leandro Cañibano & Manuel García-Ayuso & M. Sánchez, 2000. "Shortcomings in the Measurement of Innovation: Implications for Accounting Standard Setting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 4(4), pages 319-342, December.
    9. Adam Ritter & Peter Wells, 2006. "Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(5), pages 843-863, December.
    10. César Camisón & José Antonio Clemente & Sergio Camisón-Haba, 2022. "Asset tangibility, information asymmetries and intangibles as determinants of family firms leverage," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(7), pages 2047-2082, October.
    11. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    12. Sergio Camisón-Haba & Tomás Gonzáles-Cruz & José Antonio Clemente-Almendros, 2022. "Information Disclosure and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Evidence from the Spanish Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Ghafele, Roya, 2010. "Accounting for intellectual property?," MPRA Paper 37360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pascal Dumontier & Bernard Raffournier, 2002. "Accounting and capital markets: a survey of the European evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151.
    15. Gaëlle Lenormand & Lionel Touchais, 2008. "La pertinence des actifs incorporels avec les IFRS," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(2), pages 173-201, June.
    16. Rajgopal, Shiva & Venkatachalam, Mohan, 2011. "Financial reporting quality and idiosyncratic return volatility," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 1-20, February.
    17. Schaberl, Philipp D., 2016. "Beyond accounting and back: An empirical examination of the relative relevance of earnings and “other” information," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 98-113.
    18. Mohamed Sellami, 2006. "Typologie des déterminants comptables de la valeur : Apports de l'approche économique de l'information dans la mesure de la valeur," Post-Print halshs-00558252, HAL.
    19. Alessandro Mechelli & Vincenzo Sforza & Alessandra Stefanoni & Riccardo Cimini, 2018. "The Usefulness of Regulatory Capital for Investors’ Judgments in the Basel 3 Framework," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(6), pages 1-72, April.
    20. Y. Xie & H. Lee (Correspondence author), 2018. "Tunneling and Value Relevance of Financial Reports: Evidence from Hong Kong," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 11, pages 67-82, February.
    21. Morris, John J. & Alam, Pervaiz, 2012. "Value relevance and the dot-com bubble of the 1990s," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 243-255.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intangible capital; return on assets; return on equity; economic return; market to book value; goodwill; Big Four auditor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:133:y:2016:i:14:p:103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.