IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8759-d865188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Environment and Outlook within the Scope of Technologically Integrated European Green Deal in EU and Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksandr Labenko

    (Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Sobchenko

    (Department of Statistics and Economic Analysis, Faculty of Economics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Taras Hutsol

    (Department of Mechanics and Agroecosystems Engineering, Polissia National University, 10008 Zhytomyr, Ukraine
    Department of Machine Use in Agriculture, Dmytro Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University, Zhukovsky, 66, 69063 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine)

  • Michał Cupiał

    (Department of Production Organization, Logistics and Applied Computer Science, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 31-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Mudryk

    (Faculty of Production and Power Engineering, University of Agriculture in Kraków, 30-149 Kraków, Poland)

  • Anna Kocira

    (Institute of Human Nutrition and Agriculture, The University College of Applied Sciences in Chełm, 22-100 Chełm, Poland)

  • Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur

    (Deparment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Odesa State Agrarian University, 65012 Odesa, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandra Klymenko

    (International Relations Office, University of Agriculture in Kraków, al. Mickiewicza 21, 31-120 Kraków, Poland)

  • Pavel Neuberger

    (Faculty of Engineering, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycká 129, Praha 6, 16-521 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Issues of environmental security, fuel and energy independence have been forming political and economic territories for several centuries. Current events in Ukraine have become a litmus test, which clearly highlights the dangers of resource monopolies and the transfer of economic benefits. The issue of ensuring the energy system in climate neutrality became relevant even before the aggression by Russia. However, today, there is no country, it has not recognized that there is the urgent need to develop and implement effective tools for economic development in a sustainable environment. The modern cost-oriented model of knowledge of economic processes has led not only to the irrational use of natural potential. Large-scale use of natural resources and the irrational organization of production (including agricultural) disrupt the process of their reproduction, which, in turn, leads to the depletion of bioresources and, as a consequence, can lead humanity to ecological catastrophe. Certain solutions have been proposed to address these issues. To ensure the efficient use of the resources of the agricultural sector and the reliable reflection of biological processes, it is proposed to recognize the biological form of capital as self-growing and self-reproducing value, which, in the process of biological transformation, allows obtaining an additional unit of benefits. The study examines, in detail, the promising areas of the transformation of the agricultural sector in the framework of a technologically integrated European Green Deal in the EU. In this study, to determine the potential opportunities for the ecological transformation of agriculture, discrete analytical models of the assessment of the agro-industrial complex of Ukraine were used. Representative data use statistical indicators of Ukraine and, to illustrate potential opportunities, present a comparison of export data to EU countries. In addition, it reveals the realized and potential opportunities of Ukraine’s entry into the European market through the prism of the implementation programs of EU environmental policy. The place and significance of assimilation potential for a reduction in the anthropogenic impact on the environment, and providing the self-restoration of natural resources, are substantiated. It is determined that one of the most effective tools for low-cost reduction in greenhouse-gas emissions is the national-level implementation of environmental-quota trade and the development of organic production. The study includes an analytical assessment of the expected emission reductions from environmental initiatives’ implementation. Prospects for further research are the development of an effective mechanism for the systematic management of the biological potential reproduction of the agricultural sector while reducing anthropogenic impact on the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksandr Labenko & Tetiana Sobchenko & Taras Hutsol & Michał Cupiał & Krzysztof Mudryk & Anna Kocira & Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur & Oleksandra Klymenko & Pavel Neuberger, 2022. "Project Environment and Outlook within the Scope of Technologically Integrated European Green Deal in EU and Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8759-:d:865188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Karlsson & Eva Alfredsson & Nils Westling, 2020. "Climate policy co-benefits: a review," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 292-316, March.
    2. Marcin Niemiec & Monika Komorowska & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Maciej Kuboń & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Joanna Kapusta-Duch, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Social Practices in Small Vegetable farms in Poland as a Tool for the Optimization of Quality Management Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-10, July.
    3. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Maciej Kuboń & Inna Tryhuba & Serhii Komarnitskyi & Sylwester Tabor & Dariusz Kwaśniewski & Krzysztof Mudryk & Oleksandr Faichuk & Tetyana Hohol & Wioletta Tomaszewsk, 2022. "Taxonomy and Stakeholder Risk Management in Integrated Projects of the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Oleksandr Faichuk & Lesia Voliak & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Yuriy Pantsyr & Sergii Slobodian & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak, 2022. "European Green Deal: Threats Assessment for Agri-Food Exporting Countries to the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Rafał Kusa & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Joanna Duda & Marcin Niemiec, 2020. "Renewable Energy Promotion Instruments Used by Innovation Brokers in a Technology Transfer Network. Case Study of the Enterprise Europe Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Maciej Chowaniak & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Karolina Kotulewicz-Wisińska & Małgorzata Luc & Marcin Suder & Anna Szeląg-Sikora, 2021. "The RES in the Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States: Potential and Production from 2015 to 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Oleg Kucher & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Iryna Andreitseva & Anatolii Dibrova & Andrii Muzychenko & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Agnieszka Szparaga & Sławomir Kocira, 2022. "Energy Potential of Biogas Production in Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Inna Tryhuba & Krzysztof Mudryk & Valentyna Kukharets & Szymon Głowacki & Larysa Dibrova & Oleksandr Kozak & Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur, 2022. "Assessment of the Condition of the Project Environment for the Implementation of Technologically Integrated Projects of the “European Green Deal” Using Maize Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Volodymyr Nadykto & Volodymyr Kyurchev & Pavol Findura & Taras Hutsol & Sławomir Kurpaska & Anna Krakowiak-Bal & Vyacheslav Vasyuk, 2023. "European Green Deal: Study of the Combined Agricultural Aggregate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleksandr Faichuk & Lesia Voliak & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Yuriy Pantsyr & Sergii Slobodian & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak, 2022. "European Green Deal: Threats Assessment for Agri-Food Exporting Countries to the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Anatoliy Tryhuba & Taras Hutsol & Inna Tryhuba & Krzysztof Mudryk & Valentyna Kukharets & Szymon Głowacki & Larysa Dibrova & Oleksandr Kozak & Krystyna Pavlenko-Didur, 2022. "Assessment of the Condition of the Project Environment for the Implementation of Technologically Integrated Projects of the “European Green Deal” Using Maize Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Savelii Kukharets & Algirdas Jasinskas & Gennadii Golub & Olena Sukmaniuk & Taras Hutsol & Krzysztof Mudryk & Jonas Čėsna & Szymon Glowacki & Iryna Horetska, 2023. "The Experimental Study of the Efficiency of the Gasification Process of the Fast-Growing Willow Biomass in a Downdraft Gasifier," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-12, January.
    4. Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Maciej Kuboń & Tomasz Borkowski & Gabriela Malik, 2021. "Solar Power: Stellar Profit or Astronomic Cost? A Case Study of Photovoltaic Installations under Poland’s National Prosumer Policy in 2016–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Valentyna Kukharets & Dalia Juočiūnienė & Taras Hutsol & Olena Sukmaniuk & Jonas Čėsna & Savelii Kukharets & Piotr Piersa & Szymon Szufa & Iryna Horetska & Alona Shevtsova, 2023. "An Algorithm for Managerial Actions on the Rational Use of Renewable Sources of Energy: Determination of the Energy Potential of Biomass in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Agnieszka Kuś & Dorota Grego-Planer, 2021. "A Model of Innovation Activity in Small Enterprises in the Context of Selected Financial Factors: The Example of the Renewable Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Liu, Guangqiang & Zeng, Qing & Lei, Juan, 2022. "Dynamic risks from climate policy uncertainty: A case study for the natural gas market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Tomasz Pisula, 2022. "An Analysis of the Use of Energy from Conventional Fossil Fuels and Green Renewable Energy in the Context of the European Union’s Planned Energy Transformation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Jaros³aw Brodny & Magdalena Tutak, 2023. "The level of implementing sustainable development goal "Industry, innovation and infrastructure" of Agenda 2030 in the European Union countries: Application of MCDM methods," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 47-102, March.
    10. Klaus Eisenack, 2024. "Why Local Governments Set Climate Targets: Effects of City Size and Political Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(11), pages 2935-2965, November.
    11. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    12. Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Joanna Kapusta-Duch & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska & Joanna Karcz, 2019. "Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    14. Joseph Aldy & Matthew J. Kotchen & Mary Evans & Meredith Fowlie & Arik Levinson & Karen Palmer, 2021. "Cobenefits and Regulatory Impact Analysis: Theory and Evidence from Federal Air Quality Regulations," Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(1), pages 117-156.
    15. Pablo Fernández-Arias & Diego Vergara & Álvaro Antón-Sancho, 2023. "Bibliometric Review and Technical Summary of PWR Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Fanghella, Valeria & Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim, 2023. "What's in it for me? Self-interest and preferences for distribution of costs and benefits of energy efficiency policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    17. Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Małgorzata Luc & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Luis Ochoa Siguencia & Emil Velinov, 2020. "Promotion of RES in a Technology Transfer Network. Case Study of the Enterprise Europe Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    18. Otton K. Roubinek & Anna Wilinska-Lisowska & Magdalena Jasinska & Andrzej G. Chmielewski & Krzysztof Czerwionka, 2023. "Production of Biogas from Distillation Residue as a Waste Material from the Distillery Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Katsumasa Tanaka & Christian Azar & Olivier Boucher & Philippe Ciais & Yann Gaucher & Daniel J. A. Johansson, 2022. "Paris Agreement requires substantial, broad, and sustained policy efforts beyond COVID-19 public stimulus packages," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Monika Komorowska & Marcin Niemiec & Jakub Sikora & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Pavol Findura & Hatice Gurgulu & Joanna Stuglik & Maciej Chowaniak & Atılgan Atılgan, 2022. "Closed-Loop Agricultural Production and Its Environmental Efficiency: A Case Study of Sheep Wool Production in Northwestern Kyrgyzstan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8759-:d:865188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.