IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8587-d862129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Flow Behaviour of Fractured Granite under Extreme Temperature and Pressure Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Wanniarachchige Gnamani Pabasara Kumari

    (School of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia)

  • Pathegama Gamage Ranjith

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia)

Abstract

As a result of negligible connected porosity—and thus, minimal matrix permeability—the fluid-transport characteristics of crystalline rocks are strongly influenced by the fractures at all scales. Understanding the flow behaviour of fractured rock under extreme stress and temperature conditions is essential for safe and effective deep geo-engineering applications, such as deep geothermal recovery, geological nuclear waste disposal, oil and gas extraction, geological storage and deep mining operations. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the flow characteristics of mechanically fractured Australian Strathbogie granite under a wide range of stress (confining pressures 1–80 MPa) and temperature conditions (20 °C to 350 °C). The study utilised a sophisticated high-temperature, high-pressure tri-axial setup capable of simulating extreme geological conditions, followed by a numerical simulation. According to the experimental results, a linear increment in the steady-state flow rate was observed, with increased injection pressure for the experimental conditions considered. Therefore, linear laminar Darcy flow was considered, and the fracture permeability was calculated using the cubic law. It was found that stress and temperature strongly depend on the flow of fluid through fractures. The steady-state flow rate decreased exponentially with the increase in normal stress, showcasing fracture shrinkage with an increment in effective stress. With regard to permeability through the fractures, increasing temperature was found to cause an initial reduction in fracture permeability due to an increased interlock effect (induced by thermal overclosure), followed by increments because of the thermally induced damage. Furthermore, the increasing temperature caused significant non-linear increments in the fluid flow rates due to the associated viscosity and density reduction in water. Considering the laboratory-scale flow-through exercises, a fully coupled numerical model that can predict hydro–thermo–mechanical variations in the reservoir rocks was developed using the COMSOL Multiphysics simulator. The developed model was calibrated, utilising the temperature- and pressure-dependent properties of granite rocks and fluid (water); was validated against the experimental results; and was used to predict the permeability, pressure development and strain of rock samples under extreme conditions, which were difficult to achieve in the laboratory.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanniarachchige Gnamani Pabasara Kumari & Pathegama Gamage Ranjith, 2022. "Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Flow Behaviour of Fractured Granite under Extreme Temperature and Pressure Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8587-:d:862129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8587/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8587/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongfei Yang & Zhihui Liu & Zhixue Sun & Senyou An & Wenjie Zhang & Pengfei Liu & Jun Yao & Jingsheng Ma, 2017. "Research on Stress Sensitivity of Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs Based on CT Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Zeng, Yu-Chao & Wu, Neng-You & Su, Zheng & Wang, Xiao-Xing & Hu, Jian, 2013. "Numerical simulation of heat production potential from hot dry rock by water circulating through a novel single vertical fracture at Desert Peak geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 268-282.
    3. Fei Wang & Baoman Li & Yichi Zhang & Shicheng Zhang, 2017. "Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical Modeling of Water Leak-Off Process during Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Gas Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu Wang & Tianfu Xu & Yuxiang Cheng & Guanhong Feng, 2022. "Prospects for Power Generation of the Doublet Supercritical Geothermal System in Reykjanes Geothermal Field, Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Gao, Xiang & Li, Tailu, 2022. "Synergetic characteristics of three-dimensional transient heat transfer in geothermal reservoir combined with power conversion for enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 216-230.
    3. Zhang, Shuo & Song, Shengyuan & Zhang, Wen & Zhao, Jinmin & Cao, Dongfang & Ma, Wenliang & Chen, Zijian & Hu, Ying, 2023. "Research on the inherent mechanism of rock mass deformation of oil shale in-situ mining under the condition of thermal-fluid-solid coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    4. Wang, Song & Zhou, Jian & Zhang, Luqing & Han, Zhenhua & Kong, Yanlong, 2024. "Numerical insight into hydraulic fracture propagation in hot dry rock with complex natural fracture networks via fluid-solid coupling grain-based modeling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    5. Zeng, Yu-Chao & Zhan, Jie-Min & Wu, Neng-You & Luo, Ying-Ying & Cai, Wen-Hao, 2016. "Numerical investigation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir through a single vertical well at Yangbajing geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 24-39.
    6. Zeng, Yuchao & Tang, Liansheng & Wu, Nengyou & Cao, Yifei, 2017. "Analysis of influencing factors of production performance of enhanced geothermal system: A case study at Yangbajing geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 218-235.
    7. Zhang, Wei & Wang, Chunguang & Guo, Tiankui & He, Jiayuan & Zhang, Le & Chen, Shaojie & Qu, Zhanqing, 2021. "Study on the cracking mechanism of hydraulic and supercritical CO2 fracturing in hot dry rock under thermal stress," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Xu, Tianfu & Yuan, Yilong & Jia, Xiaofeng & Lei, Yude & Li, Shengtao & Feng, Bo & Hou, Zhaoyun & Jiang, Zhenjiao, 2018. "Prospects of power generation from an enhanced geothermal system by water circulation through two horizontal wells: A case study in the Gonghe Basin, Qinghai Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 196-207.
    9. Yin, Weitao & Zhao, Yangsheng & Feng, Zijun, 2019. "Experimental research on the rupture characteristics of fractures subsequently filled by magma and hydrothermal fluid in hot dry rock," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 71-79.
    10. Akdas, Satuk Bugra & Onur, Mustafa, 2022. "Analytical solutions for predicting and optimizing geothermal energy extraction from an enhanced geothermal system with a multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal-well doublet," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 567-580.
    11. Wei, Xin & Feng, Zi-jun & Zhao, Yang-sheng, 2019. "Numerical simulation of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling effect in mining fault-mode hot dry rock geothermal energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 120-135.
    12. Chen, Tairu & Liu, Gang & Liao, Shengming, 2019. "Impacts of boundary conditions on reservoir numerical simulation and performance prediction of enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-213.
    13. Kevin J. Hodder & Angel J. Sanchez-Barra & Sergey Ishutov & Gonzalo Zambrano-Narvaez & Rick J. Chalaturnyk, 2022. "Increasing Density of 3D-Printed Sandstone through Compaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Zhang, Yan-Jun & Li, Zheng-Wei & Guo, Liang-Liang & Gao, Ping & Jin, Xian-Peng & Xu, Tian-Fu, 2014. "Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: A case study in Xujiaw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 788-805.
    15. Ali Shafiei & Maurice B. Dusseault & Ehsan Kosari & Morteza N. Taleghani, 2018. "Natural Fractures Characterization and In Situ Stresses Inference in a Carbonate Reservoir—An Integrated Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-26, February.
    16. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    17. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    18. Cheng, Wen-Long & Wang, Chang-Long & Nian, Yong-Le & Han, Bing-Bing & Liu, Jian, 2016. "Analysis of influencing factors of heat extraction from enhanced geothermal systems considering water losses," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 274-288.
    19. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Liu, Xuemei & Liu, Hongliang, 2020. "Analysis on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system based on leaf-like bifurcated fracture networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Xiang Gao & Tailu Li & Yao Zhang & Xiangfei Kong & Nan Meng, 2022. "A Review of Simulation Models of Heat Extraction for a Geothermal Reservoir in an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8587-:d:862129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.