IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7894-d850788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Safety Performance at One-Level Signalized Intersections in Vilnius

Author

Listed:
  • Dainora Juozevičiūtė

    (Road Department, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, VILNIUS TECH, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Vytautas Grigonis

    (Road Department, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, VILNIUS TECH, Sauletekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

This work aims to identify the effectiveness of one-level signalized intersections with exclusive pedestrian phases in terms of vehicle-pedestrian crashes resulting in pedestrian injury or fatality. The work analyzes and evaluates specific exclusive pedestrian phases without diagonal crossing possibility at one-level signalized intersections in the city of Vilnius. Anonymized data on traffic accidents from the Lithuanian Police Department Accident Register were used for safety analysis purposes. The traffic accident data cover all traffic accidents with dead or injured persons. The traffic accident data was analyzed with the help of QGIS for selected time intervals (before and after analysis). The density of traffic accidents was calculated with the help of the comparative analysis method at 11 signalized intersections in Vilnius City, where an exclusive pedestrian phase without diagonal crossing was implemented. An exclusive pedestrian phase with diagonal crossing is usually implemented to increase pedestrian safety at a signalized intersection with a high pedestrian intensity. The analysis carried out indicates that the specific exclusive pedestrian phase without diagonal crossings in Vilnius reduced pedestrian traffic accidents by up to 100%. No traffic accidents occurred after the installation of the exclusive pedestrian phase at intersections where there were no pedestrian accidents prior to the installation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dainora Juozevičiūtė & Vytautas Grigonis, 2022. "Evaluation of Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Safety Performance at One-Level Signalized Intersections in Vilnius," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7894-:d:850788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7894/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7894/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Szagala & Andrzej Brzezinski & Mariusz Kiec & Marcin Budzynski & Joanna Wachnicka & Sylwia Pazdan, 2022. "Pedestrian Safety at Midblock Crossings on Dual Carriageway Roads in Polish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alireza Mohammadi & Behzad Kiani & Hassan Mahmoudzadeh & Robert Bergquist, 2023. "Pedestrian Road Traffic Accidents in Metropolitan Areas: GIS-Based Prediction Modelling of Cases in Mashhad, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Rella Riccardi & Francesco Galante & Antonella Scarano & Alfonso Montella, 2022. "Econometric and Machine Learning Methods to Identify Pedestrian Crash Patterns," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Monika Ziemska-Osuch & Dawid Osuch, 2022. "Modeling the Assessment of Intersections with Traffic Lights and the Significance Level of the Number of Pedestrians in Microsimulation Models Based on the PTV Vissim Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7894-:d:850788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.