IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7676-d846094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Sensory Experience Creation Process of Visitors with Hearing Impairment and General Visitors in Hong Kong Wetland Park

Author

Listed:
  • Chung Shing Chan

    (Centre for Environmental Policy and Resource Management, Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Kwo Fung Shek

    (Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

  • Dora Agapito

    (Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-Being, Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal)

Abstract

Universal accessibility and barrier-free experience of public spaces such as parks are at the frontier of social sustainability and disability research. Such accessible and quality public spaces are characterized by enjoyable sensory stimuli and facilitating factors determining the process of sensory experience creation. Among visitors with sensory impairment such as different ranges of hearing loss, an understanding and a comparison of this process with that of general visitors is largely absent. This paper presents a comparative investigation of the sensory experience creation process between visitors with hearing impairment (HI) and that of general visitors in the Hong Kong Wetland Park. This study incorporates a series of field visits to the Wetland Park with a sample of 104 HI participants and their self-reported, questionnaire-based survey, in parallel with 279 general visitor surveys. Through an inter-group statistical comparison between HI sub-groups of severe hearing loss and mild hearing loss and general visitors who reported no hearing difficulty, the findings suggest three variables with significant difference, namely, experienced tactile sense, interactions with other visitors, and feelings of attachment to the Wetland Park. HI experience-based recommendations are categorized into park features and environment and programming and experience enhancement.

Suggested Citation

  • Chung Shing Chan & Kwo Fung Shek & Dora Agapito, 2022. "Comparing Sensory Experience Creation Process of Visitors with Hearing Impairment and General Visitors in Hong Kong Wetland Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7676-:d:846094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noel Biseko Lwoga & Bertram Baltazar Mapunda, 2017. "Challenges Facing Accessible Tourism In Cultural Heritage Sites: The Case Of Village Museum In Tanzania," Revista de turism - studii si cercetari in turism / Journal of tourism - studies and research in tourism, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 24(24), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Dickinson, Dawn C. & Hobbs, Richard J., 2017. "Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 179-194.
    3. Monica Cerdan Chiscano & Ana Isabel Jiménez-Zarco, 2021. "Towards an Inclusive Museum Management Strategy. An Exploratory Study of Consumption Experience in Visitors with Disabilities. The Case of the CosmoCaixa Science Museum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Jee-Eun Lim, 2020. "Understanding the Discrimination Experienced by Customers with Disabilities in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry: The Case of Seoul in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bolaños-Valencia, Ingrid & Villegas-Palacio, Clara & López-Gómez, Connie Paola & Berrouet, Lina & Ruiz, Aura, 2019. "Social perception of risk in socio-ecological systems. A qualitative and quantitative analysis," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Li-Pei Peng & Wei-Ming Wang, 2020. "Hybrid Decision-Making Evaluation for Future Scenarios of Cultural Ecosystem Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Tandarić, Neven & Ives, Christopher D. & Watkins, Charles, 2022. "From city in the park to “greenery in plant pots”: The influence of socialist and post-socialist planning on opportunities for cultural ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    4. Ezgi Özcan & Zehra Güçhan Topcu & Hüseyin Arasli, 2021. "Determinants of Travel Participation and Experiences of Wheelchair Users Traveling to the Bodrum Region: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-27, February.
    5. Donatella Valente & María Victoria Marinelli & Erica Maria Lovello & Cosimo Gaspare Giannuzzi & Irene Petrosillo, 2022. "Fostering the Resiliency of Urban Landscape through the Sustainable Spatial Planning of Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Ana Isabel González-Herrera & Andrea Betsabé Díaz-Herrera & Paula Hernández-Dionis & David Pérez-Jorge, 2023. "Educational and accessible museums and cultural spaces," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Damir Popović & Iva Slivar & Marli Gonan Božac, 2022. "Accessible Tourism and Formal Planning: Current State of Istria County in Croatia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, November.
    8. You Zuo & Lin Zhang, 2023. "Research on Local Ecosystem Cultural Services in the Jiangnan Water Network Rural Areas: A Case Study of the Ecological Green Integration Demonstration Zone in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Chowdhury, Koushik & Behera, Bhagirath, 2021. "Traditional water bodies and cultural ecosystem services: Experiences from rural West Bengal, India," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    10. Lucia Bosone & Raquel Bertoldo, 2022. "The Greater the Contact, the Closer the Threat: The Influence of Contact with Nature on the Social Perception of Biodiversity Loss and the Effectiveness of Conservation Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Cristina Matos Silva & Fátima Bernardo & Maria Manso & Isabel Loupa Ramos, 2023. "Green Spaces over a Roof or on the Ground, Does It Matter? The Perception of Ecosystem Services and Potential Restorative Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Judy Bush & Gavin Ashley & Ben Foster & Gail Hall, 2021. "Integrating Green Infrastructure into Urban Planning: Developing Melbourne’s Green Factor Tool," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 20-31.
    13. Yolanda María De La Fuente-Robles & María Dolores Muñoz-de-Dios & Ana Belén Mudarra-Fernández & Adrián Jesús Ricoy-Cano, 2020. "Understanding Stakeholder Attitudes, Needs and Trends in Accessible Tourism: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Yawen Sun & Shaohua Tan & Qixiao He & Jize Shen, 2022. "Influence Mechanisms of Community Sports Parks to Enhance Social Interaction: A Bayesian Belief Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Grzyb, Tomasz, 2024. "Mapping cultural ecosystem services of the urban riverscapes: the case of the Vistula River in Warsaw, Poland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Lishan Xu & Changlin Ao & Baoqi Liu & Zhenyu Cai, 2023. "Ecotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2977-3003, April.
    17. Zhang, Yingnan & Long, Hualou & Chen, Shuocun & Ma, Li & Gan, Muye, 2023. "The development of multifunctional agriculture in farming regions of China: Convergence or divergence?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Flood, Kate & Mahon, Marie & McDonagh, John, 2021. "Assigning value to cultural ecosystem services: The significance of memory and imagination in the conservation of Irish peatlands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    19. Schirpke, Uta & Scolozzi, Rocco & Dean, Graeme & Haller, Andreas & Jäger, Hieronymus & Kister, Jutta & Kovács, Barbara & Sarmiento, Fausto O. & Sattler, Birgit & Schleyer, Christian, 2020. "Cultural ecosystem services in mountain regions: Conceptualising conflicts among users and limitations of use," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Haiyun Xu & Guohan Zhao, 2021. "Assessing the Value of Urban Green Infrastructure Ecosystem Services for High-Density Urban Management and Development: Case from the Capital Core Area of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7676-:d:846094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.