IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p7635-d845357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Factor Index Measurement Using an ISM-SEM-Fuzzy Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kamala Vijayakumar

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Paul Robert

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai 600025, Tamil Nadu, India)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a trend toward automation and data exchange in manufacturing processes through industrial cognitive computing, the Internet of Things (IoT), and artificial intelligence. However, the human–machine interface plays a role in establishing a smart manufacturing system in any industry. It is necessary to develop a comprehensive model to identify the risk factors that contribute to the loss of human performance and productivity and evaluate the workplace for its compliance and agility toward safe human–machine systems. In this study, a model is proposed that can be used as a measurement tool to design ergonomic workplaces in the automotive industry. Several criteria have been classified under four enablers: physiological factors, psychological factors, environmental factors, and safety factors. These were identified through a literature review. The proposed model integrates the applications of structural equation modeling (SEM), interpretive structural modeling (ISM), and the multigrade fuzzy approach. ISM was employed to demonstrate the applicability of the model to depict various ergonomic enablers considered in the ergonomic measurement. SEM was used to validate the ergonomic measurement model statistically. Physiological factors were found to be highly correlated with ergonomic practices. Physiological and psychological factors were also highly correlated. The use of the multigrade fuzzy approach was demonstrated to determine the human factor index for an automotive component manufacturing industry. The proposed model can enable management to evaluate the various risk factors that hamper the ergonomic level of a company and thereby allow the company to harness the benefits of ergonomics to enhance safety and productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamala Vijayakumar & Paul Robert, 2022. "Human Factor Index Measurement Using an ISM-SEM-Fuzzy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7635-:d:845357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7635/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/7635/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Vasanthakumar & S. Vinodh & K. Ramesh, 2016. "Application of interpretive structural modelling for analysis of factors influencing lean remanufacturing practices," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(24), pages 7439-7452, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sujan Piya & Ahm Shamsuzzoha & Mohammad Khadem & Nasr Al-Hinai, 2020. "Identification of Critical Factors and Their Interrelationships to Design Agile Supply Chain: Special Focus to Oil and Gas Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 263-281, September.
    2. S. Maryam Masoumi & Nima Kazemi & Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid, 2019. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Chand, Pushpendu & Thakkar, Jitesh J. & Ghosh, Kunal Kanti, 2020. "Analysis of supply chain sustainability with supply chain complexity, inter-relationship study using delphi and interpretive structural modeling for Indian mining and earthmoving machinery industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ayush Gupta, 2020. "Framework for sustainable maintenance system: ISM–fuzzy MICMAC and TOPSIS approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 643-676, July.
    5. Godinho Filho, Moacir & Marchesini, Antonio Gilberto & Riezebos, Jan & Vandaele, Nico & Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós, 2017. "The application of Quick Response Manufacturing practices in Brazil, Europe, and the USA: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 437-448.
    6. Shelly Gupta & Sanjay Dhingra, 2022. "Modeling the key factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services: an interpretive structural modeling approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 96-110, June.
    7. Xiaohong Jiang & Huiying Wang & Xiucheng Guo & Xiaolin Gong, 2019. "Using the FAHP, ISM, and MICMAC Approaches to Study the Sustainability Influencing Factors of the Last Mile Delivery of Rural E-Commerce Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Nitin S. Solke & Pritesh Shah & Ravi Sekhar & T. P. Singh, 2022. "Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling and Control of Lean Manufacturing in Automotive Parts Manufacturing Industry," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(1), pages 89-112, March.
    9. Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi & Abdul Basit, 2019. "An Interpretive Structural Model of Barriers in Implementing Corporate Governance (CG) in Pakistan," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 359-375, March.
    10. Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Razvan Bologa & Ramona Bologa, 2018. "Impact of Competitive Capabilities on Sustainable Manufacturing Applications in Romanian SMEs from the Textile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    11. Muhammad Zeeshan Shaukat & Madiha Saleem & Muhammad Usman Ajmal Mirza & Abdul Basit & Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi, 2023. "Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) to Impose Hierarchy on Critical Issues of Contractual Bargaining: A Study of Construction Industry of Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 69-84.
    12. Geandra Alves Queiroz & Ivete Delai & Alceu Gomes Alves Filho & Luis Antonio de Santa-Eulalia & Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, 2023. "Synergies and Trade-Offs between Lean-Green Practices from the Perspective of Operations Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Nitin S. Solke & T. P. Singh, 2018. "Analysis of Relationship Between Manufacturing Flexibility and Lean Manufacturing Using Structural Equation Modelling," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 19(2), pages 139-157, June.
    14. Manavalan Ethirajan & Thanigai Arasu M & Jayakrishna Kandasamy & Vimal K.E.K & Simon Peter Nadeem & Anil Kumar, 2021. "Analysing the risks of adopting circular economy initiatives in manufacturing supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 204-236, January.
    15. Satyabrata Aich & Ayusha Thakur & Deepanjan Nanda & Sushanta Tripathy & Hee-Cheol Kim, 2021. "Factors Affecting ESG towards Impact on Investment: A Structural Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Harshad Chandrakant Sonar & Vivek Khanzode & Milind Akarte, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework on Implementing Additive Manufacturing Technology Towards Firm Competitiveness," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-135, December.
    17. M. Suguna & Bhavin Shah & B. U. Sivakami & M. Suresh, 2022. "Factors affecting repurposing operations in Micro Small and Medium Enterprises during Covid-19 emergency," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1181-1197, December.
    18. Avinash, A. & Sasikumar, P. & Murugesan, A., 2018. "Understanding the interaction among the barriers of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil in India- an interpretive structural modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 678-684.
    19. Abdul Aziz Khan Niazi & Tehmina Fiaz Qazi & Abdul Basit, 2019. "Expounding the Structure of Slyer Ways of Tunneling in Pakistan," Global Regional Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(2), pages 329-343, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7635-:d:845357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.