IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7370-d840450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vertisols in the Ethiopian Highlands: Interaction between Land Use Systems, Soil Properties, and Different Types of Fertilizer Applied to Teff and Wheat

Author

Listed:
  • Eyasu Elias

    (Centre for Environmental Science, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 1176, Ethiopia)

  • Gizachew Kebede Biratu

    (Department of Natural Resource Management, School of Natural Resource, Guder Mamo Mezemir Campus, Ambo University, Ambo P.O. Box 19, Ethiopia)

  • Eric M. A. Smaling

    (Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Vertisols are among the most extensive soil types in the Ethiopian highlands, occurring in a wide range of agro-ecological zones where complex crop–livestock-based farming systems are practiced. Sustainable soil management on vertisols always meets with physical characteristics that are driven by clay mineralogy, swelling, shrinking, and risk of temporary waterlogging. The latter causes substantial spatial variability and turns vertisols into obnoxious study material, when compared to other soil classification orders. In this study, we have explored soil properties across different farming systems using soil profile and analytical data generated by the CASCAPE project; an action research project funded by the Dutch government for capacity building on the scaling up of evidence-based best practices for increased agricultural production in Ethiopia. In addition, the effects of variations in vertisol properties on crop yield and fertilizer response were examined through fertilizer trials in different locations. Teff ( Eragrostis teff Zucc.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivium ), the two cereal crops commonly grown on vertisols, were used as test crops. Five treatments of NPSZnB—nitrogen, phosphorous, sulfur, zinc and boron containing blend (50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 kg/ha)—and two treatments comparing NPS and diammonium phosphate (DAP) with the blend containing Zn and B were included in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Results revealed that soil quality was generally poor under the highland cereal systems, i.e., sorghum–teff–livestock mixed system (FS 1 ) and wheat–maize–teff–barley–livestock system (FS 2 ) compared to the enset–coffee–cereal–livestock complex system (FS 3 ), which cannot only be attributed to geological history, but also to the way the land use systems have shaped the soils. The emerging differences in soil properties significantly ( p < 0.01) affected crop yields. The soil properties that had the largest influence on teff and wheat yield were soil pH, organic carbon (OC), available sulfur (S), exchangeable potassium (K) and some micronutrients (B, Fe, Mn and Cu). Teff grain and biomass yield were inversely related, unlike wheat. Regarding the rate of fertilizer application, wheat responded significantly up to the highest level (300 kg/ha), but teff yield leveled off earlier. The blend fertilizers did not perform any better than NPS or DAP alone. Given the extent and the importance of vertisols in Ethiopian agriculture, comprehensive future outlooks are needed, including the options for cluster farming and mechanization to realize economies of scale and more efficient use of capital and labor inputs.

Suggested Citation

  • Eyasu Elias & Gizachew Kebede Biratu & Eric M. A. Smaling, 2022. "Vertisols in the Ethiopian Highlands: Interaction between Land Use Systems, Soil Properties, and Different Types of Fertilizer Applied to Teff and Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7370-:d:840450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7370/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7370/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Mamo, T & Mohamed Saleem, M A, 2001. "From plot to watershed management : Experience in farmer participatory Vertisol technology generation and adoption in highland Ethiopia," Research Reports 182890, International Livestock Research Institute.
    2. Erkossa, T. & Haileslassie, A. & MacAlister, C., 2014. "Enhancing farming system water productivity through alternative land use and water management in vertisol areas of Ethiopian Blue Nile Basin (Abay)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 120-128.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutengano Mwinuka & Khamaldin Daud Mutabazi & Frieder Graef & Stefan Sieber & Jeremia Makindara & Anthony Kimaro & Götz Uckert, 2017. "Simulated willingness of farmers to adopt fertilizer micro-dosing and rainwater harvesting technologies in semi-arid and sub-humid farming systems in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1237-1253, December.
    2. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Gebrehiwot, Tagel & Bezabih, Mintewab, 2019. "Climate smart agricultural practices and gender differentiated nutrition outcome: An empirical evidence from Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 38-53.
    3. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Mekonnen, Alemu, 2020. "Weather at Different Growth Stages, Multiple Climate Smart Practices and Farm Level Risks: Panel Data Evidence from the Nile Basin of Ethiopia," EfD Discussion Paper 20-4, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    4. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Mekonnen, Alemu & Gebrehiwot, Tagel & Bezabih, Mintewab, 2019. "Open Access Post-Harvest Grazing and Farmers’ Preferences for Forage Production Incentives: A Choice Experiment Study of Ethiopia," EfD Discussion Paper 19-16, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    5. Frieder Graef & Götz Uckert & Jana Schindler & Hannes Jochen König & Hadijah A. Mbwana & Anja Fasse & Lutengano Mwinuka & Henry Mahoo & Laurent N. Kaburire & Paul Saidia & Yusto Mugisha Yustas & Valer, 2017. "Expert-based ex-ante assessments of potential social, ecological, and economic impacts of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania using the ScalA-FS approach," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1255-1270, December.
    6. Hailemariam Teklewold & Alemu Mekonnen & Gunnar Kohlin & Salvatore Di Falco, 2017. "Does Adoption Of Multiple Climate-Smart Practices Improve Farmers’ Climate Resilience? Empirical Evidence From The Nile Basin Of Ethiopia," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Mekonnen, Alemu, 2017. "The Tilling of Land in a Changing Climate: Panel Data Evidence from the Nile Basin of Ethiopia," EfD Discussion Paper 17-3, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    8. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Mekonnen, Alemu & Gebrehiwot, Tagel & Bezabih, Mintewab, 2020. "Open access post-harvest grazing and farmers’ preferences for forage production incentives in Ethiopia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Wuletawu Abera & Yonas Getaneh & Yodit Balcha & Tewodros Assefa & Chalachew A. Mulatu & Girma Yimer Ebrahim & Megersa Tesfaye & Meseret Dawit & Wubneh Belete Abebe & Meron Teferi Taye, 2024. "Framing water–energy–food–ecosystem (WEFE) nexus interactions in the Tana-Beles Sub-basin of Ethiopia," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Teklewold, Hailemariam & Gebrehiwot, Tagel & Ayele, Mintewab, 2018. "The Impact of Multiple Climate Smart Practices on Gender Differentiated Nutrition Outcomes: Panel Data Evidence from Ethiopia," EfD Discussion Paper 18-14, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7370-:d:840450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.