IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7275-d838368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fire Risk Assessment of Subway Stations Based on Combination Weighting of Game Theory and TOPSIS Method

Author

Listed:
  • Weiyi Ju

    (College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Jie Wu

    (College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Qingchun Kang

    (College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Juncheng Jiang

    (College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Zhixiang Xing

    (College of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of urban modernization, traffic congestion, travel delays, and other related inconveniences have become central features in people’s daily lives. The development of subway transit systems has alleviated some of these problems. However, numerous underground subway stations lack adequate fire safety protections, and this can cause rescue difficulties in the event of fire. Once the fire occurs, there will be huge property losses and casualties. In addition, this can have a vicious impact on sustainable development. Therefore, in order to make prevention in advance and implement targeted measures, we should quantify the risk and calculate the fire risk value. In this study, through consulting experts and analysis of data obtained from Changzhou Railway Company and the Emergency Management Bureau, the fire risk index system of subway stations was determined. We calculated the index weight by selecting the combination weighting method of game theory to eliminate the limitations and dependence of subjective and objective evaluation methods. The idea of relative closeness degree in TOPSIS method iwas introduced to calculate the risk value of each subway station. Finally, the subway station risk value model was established, and the risk values for each subway station were calculated and sorted. According to expert advice and the literature review, we divided the risk level into five levels, very high; high; moderate; low and very low. The results shown that 2 subway stations on Line 1 have very high fire risk, 2 subway stations on Line 1 have high fire risk, 2 subway stations on Line 1 have moderate fire risk, 8 subway stations on Line 1 have low fire risk, and 13 subway stations on Line 1 have very low fire risk. We hope that through this evaluation model method and the results to bring some references for local rail companies. Meanwhile, this evaluation model method also promotes resilience and sustainability in social development.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiyi Ju & Jie Wu & Qingchun Kang & Juncheng Jiang & Zhixiang Xing, 2022. "Fire Risk Assessment of Subway Stations Based on Combination Weighting of Game Theory and TOPSIS Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7275-:d:838368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Junwu Wang & Sen Liu & Yinghui Song & Jing Wang & Han Wu & Victor Shi, 2021. "Environmental Risk Assessment of Subway Station Construction to Achieve Sustainability Using the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Set Pair Analysis," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-17, April.
    2. Yuangang Li & Maohua Sun & Guanghui Yuan & Qi Zhou & Jinyue Liu, 2019. "Study on Development Sustainability of Atmospheric Environment in Northeast China by Rough Set and Entropy Weight Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Zuiyi Shen & Qianqian Zhao & Qimin Fang, 2021. "Analysis of Green Traffic Development in Zhoushan Based on Entropy Weight TOPSIS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Jiansong Wu & Zhuqiang Hu & Jinyue Chen & Zheng Li, 2018. "Risk Assessment of Underground Subway Stations to Fire Disasters Using Bayesian Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Matellini, D.B. & Wall, A.D. & Jenkinson, I.D. & Wang, J. & Pritchard, R., 2013. "Modelling dwelling fire development and occupancy escape using Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-91.
    6. Dhalmahapatra, Krantiraditya & Garg, Ashish & Singh, Kritika & Xavier, Nirmal Francis & Maiti, J., 2022. "An integrated RFUCOM – RTOPSIS approach for failure modes and effects analysis: A case of manufacturing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Hao, Han & Wang, Hewu & Yi, Ran, 2011. "Hybrid modeling of China’s vehicle ownership and projection through 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 1351-1361.
    8. Zhenhua Luo & Li Zeng & Haize Pan & Qijun Hu & Bo Liang & Jianqiang Han, 2019. "Research on Construction Safety Risk Assessment of New Subway Station Close-Attached Undercrossing the Existing Operating Station," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, July.
    9. Hui Chen & Zi-Hui Shang & Huan-Jie Cai & Yan Zhu, 2019. "An Optimum Irrigation Schedule with Aeration for Greenhouse Tomato Cultivations Based on Entropy Evaluation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi Yuan & Hongqinq Zhu & Xiaolei Zhang & Baozhen Zhang & Xingkai Zhang, 2022. "An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Pingping Cao & Jin Zheng & Mingyang Li & Yu Fu, 2023. "A Model for the Assignment of Emergency Rescuers Considering Collaborative Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    3. Haizhen Cao & Hongxiang Ou & Weiyi Ju & Mengli Pan & Honglai Xue & Fang Zhu, 2023. "Visual Analysis of International Environmental Security Management Research (1997–2021) Based on VOSviewer and CiteSpace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ning Pang & Xiaoya Deng & Aihua Long & Lili Zhang & Xinchen Gu, 2022. "Evaluation of the Resilience of the Socio-Hydrological System of the Tarim River Basin in China and Analysis of the Degree of Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Qi Yuan & Hongqinq Zhu & Xiaolei Zhang & Baozhen Zhang & Xingkai Zhang, 2022. "An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Underground Engineering Fires," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    3. Wu, Jiansong & Zhang, Linlin & Bai, Yiping & Reniers, Genserik, 2022. "A safety investment optimization model for power grid enterprises based on System Dynamics and Bayesian network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Yuan, Zhiyi & Ou, Xunmin & Peng, Tianduo & Yan, Xiaoyu, 2019. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of multi-pathways natural gas vehicles in china considering methane leakage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Lingxia Wang & Zhongwu Li & Danyang Wang & Xiaoqian Hu & Ke Ning, 2020. "Self-Organizing Map Network-Based Soil and Water Conservation Partitioning for Small Watersheds: Case Study Conducted in Xiaoyang Watershed, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Gambhir, Ajay & Tse, Lawrence K.C. & Tong, Danlu & Martinez-Botas, Ricardo, 2015. "Reducing China’s road transport sector CO2 emissions to 2050: Technologies, costs and decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 905-917.
    7. Wang, Wenhao & Wang, Yanhui & Wang, Guangxing & Li, Man & Jia, Limin, 2023. "Identification of the critical accident causative factors in the urban rail transit system by complex network theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 610(C).
    8. Al-Ghandoor, Ahmed & Samhouri, Murad & Al-Hinti, Ismael & Jaber, Jamal & Al-Rawashdeh, Mohammad, 2012. "Projection of future transport energy demand of Jordan using adaptive neuro-fuzzy technique," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 128-135.
    9. Peng, Tianduo & Ou, Xunmin & Yuan, Zhiyi & Yan, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Xiliang, 2018. "Development and application of China provincial road transport energy demand and GHG emissions analysis model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 313-328.
    10. Jun Dong & Dongxue Wang & Dongran Liu & Palidan Ainiwaer & Linpeng Nie, 2019. "Operation Health Assessment of Power Market Based on Improved Matter-Element Extension Cloud Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, October.
    11. Chilin Wei & Yan Zhu & Jinzhu Zhang & Zhenhua Wang, 2021. "Evaluation of Suitable Mixture of Water and Air for Processing Tomato in Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang Oasis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2017. "An overview of energy efficiency standards in China's transport sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 246-256.
    13. Yitian Xing & Fue-Sang Lien & William Melek & Eugene Yee, 2022. "A Multi-Hour Ahead Wind Power Forecasting System Based on a WRF-TOPSIS-ANFIS Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-35, July.
    14. Wang, Xinjian & Liu, Zhengjiang & Loughney, Sean & Yang, Zaili & Wang, Yanfu & Wang, Jin, 2022. "Numerical analysis and staircase layout optimisation for a Ro-Ro passenger ship during emergency evacuation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    15. Jun Hu & Xuecai Xie & Xueming Shu & Shifei Shen & Xiaoyong Ni & Lei Zhang, 2022. "Fire Risk Assessments of Informal Settlements Based on Fire Risk Index and Bayesian Network," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Kai Guo & Wei Wang & Shixiang Tian & Juntao Yang & Zebiao Jiang & Zhangyin Dai, 2022. "Research on Optimization Technology of Cross-Regional Synergistic Deployment of Fire Stations Based on Fire Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Hao, Han & Wang, Sinan & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan, 2016. "The impact of stepped fuel economy targets on automaker's light-weighting strategy: The China case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 755-765.
    18. Manuel Llorca & José Baños & José Somoza & Pelayo Arbués, 2017. "A Stochastic Frontier Analysis Approach for Estimating Energy Demand and Efficiency in the Transport Sector of Latin America and the Caribbean," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    19. Hao, Han & Liu, Zongwei & Zhao, Fuquan & Li, Weiqi, 2016. "Natural gas as vehicle fuel in China: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 521-533.
    20. Yan, Jiaze & Wang, Ge & Chen, Siyuan & Zhang, He & Qian, Jiaqi & Mao, Yuxuan, 2022. "Harnessing freight platforms to promote the penetration of long-haul heavy-duty hydrogen fuel-cell trucks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7275-:d:838368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.