IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7158-d836228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Differential Game Strategy of the Energy Big Data Ecosystem Considering Technological Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Dong

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • A-Ru-Han Bao

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yao Liu

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Xi-Hao Dou

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Dong-Ran Liu

    (Department of Economic Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Gui-Yuan Xue

    (Economic Research Institute, State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

This study discusses how to create strategic value through energy big data and how to promote stakeholder interaction mechanisms in the evolution of the energy big data ecosystem. We use differential game methods to study the interaction between one power grid enterprise (PG) and one technology supplier (TS) under three different cost-sharing contracts: without cost-sharing contract, cost-sharing contract, and two-way subsidy contract. The effectiveness of the dynamic equilibrium strategies under different contracts is verified via numerical simulations. The results show that under the centralized decision scenario, the technological innovation investment, the degree of technological advancement of PG and TS, and the total profit of the supply chain system are superior to the decentralized decision scenario. The extent of TS technology innovation investment depends on the share rate of PG. Technology innovation investment and the profits of energy big data service supply chain stakeholders will increase with the sensitivity coefficient of technological advancement. Compared with contracts without cost-sharing and with cost-sharing, the two-way subsidy contract can provide the Pareto optimal solution for the investment trajectory of technological innovation and long-term profits. Theoretically, this study reveals a new perspective in the research on the relationship between power grid enterprises and technology suppliers under dynamic technology innovation. In practice, this study facilitates power grid enterprises and technology suppliers to form a closer cooperative relationship in the energy big data ecosystem. More importantly, it is helpful for power grid enterprises to make optimal transaction decisions at different stages of energy big data ecosystem evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Dong & A-Ru-Han Bao & Yao Liu & Xi-Hao Dou & Dong-Ran Liu & Gui-Yuan Xue, 2022. "Dynamic Differential Game Strategy of the Energy Big Data Ecosystem Considering Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7158-:d:836228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Weihua & Long, Shangsong & Xie, Dong & Liang, Yanjie & Wang, Jinkun, 2021. "How to govern the big data discriminatory pricing behavior in the platform service supply chain?An examination with a three-party evolutionary game model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Vázquez-Canteli, José R. & Nagy, Zoltán, 2019. "Reinforcement learning for demand response: A review of algorithms and modeling techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1072-1089.
    3. Jabarzare, Nahid & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for pricing and determining quality level through coordination contracts in a dual-channel supply chain including manufacturer and packaging company," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    4. Laurent Busca & Laurent Bertrandias, 2020. "A Framework for Digital Marketing Research: Investigating the Four Cultural Eras of Digital Marketing," Post-Print hal-02391063, HAL.
    5. Cloarec, Julien, 2020. "The personalization–privacy paradox in the attention economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Büchi, Giacomo & Cugno, Monica & Castagnoli, Rebecca, 2020. "Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Min, Qingfei & Lu, Yangguang & Liu, Zhiyong & Su, Chao & Wang, Bo, 2019. "Machine Learning based Digital Twin Framework for Production Optimization in Petrochemical Industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 502-519.
    8. Fan, Shuai & Liu, Jiang & Wu, Qing & Cui, Mingjian & Zhou, Huan & He, Guangyu, 2020. "Optimal coordination of virtual power plant with photovoltaics and electric vehicles: A temporally coupled distributed online algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    9. El Ouardighi, Fouad, 2014. "Supply quality management with optimal wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts: A two-stage game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 260-268.
    10. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1514-1514, December.
    11. Busca, Laurent & Bertrandias, Laurent, 2020. "A Framework for Digital Marketing Research: Investigating the Four Cultural Eras of Digital Marketing," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1-19.
    12. Nolden, C. & Barnes, J. & Nicholls, J., 2020. "Community energy business model evolution: A review of solar photovoltaic developments in England," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Rialti, Riccardo & Zollo, Lamberto & Ferraris, Alberto & Alon, Ilan, 2019. "Big data analytics capabilities and performance: Evidence from a moderated multi-mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    14. Mamonov, Stanislav & Triantoro, Tamilla Mavlanova, 2018. "The strategic value of data resources in emergent industries," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 146-155.
    15. Fuerst, Franz & Warren-Myers, Georgia, 2018. "Does voluntary disclosure create a green lemon problem? Energy-efficiency ratings and house prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Fosso Wamba, Samuel & Akter, Shahriar & Edwards, Andrew & Chopin, Geoffrey & Gnanzou, Denis, 2015. "How ‘big data’ can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 234-246.
    17. Ingemar Dierickx & Karel Cool, 1989. "Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(12), pages 1504-1511, December.
    18. Gebrehiwot, Kiflom & Mondal, Md. Alam Hossain & Ringler, Claudia & Gebremeskel, Abiti Getaneh, 2019. "Optimization and cost-benefit assessment of hybrid power systems for off-grid rural electrification in Ethiopia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 234-246.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hausladen, Iris & Schosser, Maximilian, 2020. "Towards a maturity model for big data analytics in airline network planning," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    2. Braganza, Ashley & Brooks, Laurence & Nepelski, Daniel & Ali, Maged & Moro, Russ, 2017. "Resource management in big data initiatives: Processes and dynamic capabilities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 328-337.
    3. Sharma, Rohit & Jain, Geetika & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Does the world need to change its vaccine distribution strategy for COVID-19?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Zhang, Yucheng & Hou, Zhongwei & Yang, Feifei & Yang, Miles M. & Wang, Zhiling, 2021. "Discovering the evolution of resource-based theory: Science mapping based on bibliometric analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 500-516.
    5. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    6. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    7. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    8. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    9. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    10. Qing Li & Long Hai Vo, 2021. "Intangible Capital and Innovation: An Empirical Analysis of Vietnamese Enterprises," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 21-02, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    11. Christine M. Chan & Jialin Du, 2021. "The dynamic process of pro-market reforms and foreign affiliate performance: When to seek local, subnational, or global help?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(9), pages 1854-1870, December.
    12. Robert P. Garrett Jr. & Jeffrey G. Covin, 2015. "Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge–Based Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(4), pages 763-790, July.
    13. Marco Valeri & Rodolfo Baggio, 2021. "A critical reflection on the adoption of blockchain in tourism," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 121-132, June.
    14. Blanco Callejo, M, 2007. "LA VENTA DE LA ILUSIÓN Y “LA BRUJA DE ORO”: EL EMBRUJO DE UN CÍRCULO VIRTUOSOi /," Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE), Academia Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (AEDEM), vol. 13(3), pages 33-56.
    15. Brogi, Marina & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "Better safe than sorry. Bank corporate governance, risk-taking, and performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    16. Colombo, Massimo G. & Garrone, Paola, 1998. "Common carriers' entry into multimedia services," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 77-105, March.
    17. Luís Cabral, 2018. "We’re Number 1: Price Wars for Market Share Leadership," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 2013-2030, May.
    18. Ashish Kumar & Muskaan Arora & Monika Saini, 2023. "Influence of mathematics on the academic performance of mechanical engineering students: a PLS-SEM approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 367-376, February.
    19. Munjal, Surender & Requejo, Ignacio & Kundu, Sumit K., 2019. "Offshore outsourcing and firm performance: Moderating effects of size, growth and slack resources," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 484-494.
    20. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7158-:d:836228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.