IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p6997-d833699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revitalization of Mill Island Cultural Facilities as a Factor of the Region’s Attractiveness and Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Marek Jóźwiak

    (Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 430 Fordońska St., 85-790 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Patrycja Sieg

    (Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 430 Fordońska St., 85-790 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Iwona Posadzińska

    (Faculty of Management, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 430 Fordońska St., 85-790 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

In 2004, far-reaching changes in the appearance of Mill Island were triggered by the decisions of Bydgoszcz city authorities. The city authorities’ decision to transform the area into a space of cultural significance has given it a new life. Mill Island has become the city’s landmark. The article attempts to determine the significance of revitalization for the preservation of Mill Island’s unique cultural heritage as well as identify the factors improving the region’s competitiveness. To pursue the research objectives, the authors conducted a survey among the residents of the city of Bydgoszcz and its immediate surroundings. As the aim of the study, the authors indicated the importance of the revitalization of Mill Island for the preservation of cultural heritage and the improvement of the competitiveness of the place from the point of view of the inhabitants of Bydgoszcz. It was found that Bydgoszcz is most commonly associated with cultural tourism. The respondents pointed to the fact that the cultural heritage of Mill Island, which enhances the city’s attractiveness and increases the region’s competitiveness, has been preserved.

Suggested Citation

  • Marek Jóźwiak & Patrycja Sieg & Iwona Posadzińska, 2022. "Revitalization of Mill Island Cultural Facilities as a Factor of the Region’s Attractiveness and Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6997-:d:833699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6997/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/6997/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Konior & Weronika Pokojska, 2020. "Management of Postindustrial Heritage in Urban Revitalization Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Adam R. Szromek & Mateusz Naramski, 2019. "Measuring Trust in Business Relations between Tourist Facilities on One Thematic Touristic Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Piotr Oleśniewicz & Sławomir Pytel & Julita Markiewicz-Patkowska & Adam R. Szromek & Soňa Jandová, 2020. "A Model of the Sustainable Management of the Natural Environment in National Parks—A Case Study of National Parks in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, March.
    4. Héctor Moreno-Mendoza & Agustín Santana-Talavera & Carmelo J. León, 2019. "Stakeholders of Cultural Heritage as Responsible Institutional Tourism Product Management Agents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Mateusz Naramski & Krzysztof Herman, 2019. "The Development of Mobile Tourism in the Upper Silesian Metropolitan Area of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Maria Palazzo & Iza Gigauri & Mirela Clementina Panait & Simona Andreea Apostu & Alfonso Siano, 2022. "Sustainable Tourism Issues in European Countries during the Global Pandemic Crisis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Rizzo, Ilde & Throsby, David, 2006. "Cultural Heritage: Economic Analysis and Public Policy," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 28, pages 983-1016, Elsevier.
    8. V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), 2006. "Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1, December.
    9. Aleksandra Jadach-Sepioło & Katarzyna Olejniczak-Szuster & Michał Dziadkiewicz, 2021. "Does Environment Matter in Smart Revitalization Strategies? Management towards Sustainable Urban Regeneration Programs in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Imre Lengyel & János Rechnitzer, 2013. "Drivers of Regional Competitiveness in the Central European Countries," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 20(3), pages 421-435, November.
    11. Chris Steyaert & Jerome Katz, 2004. "Reclaiming the space of entrepreneurship in society: geographical, discursive and social dimensions," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 179-196, May.
    12. Qing Yuan & HakJun Song & Nan Chen & Wenwen Shang, 2019. "Roles of Tourism Involvement and Place Attachment in Determining Residents’ Attitudes Toward Industrial Heritage Tourism in a Resource-Exhausted City in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Adam R. Szromek & Krzysztof Herman, 2019. "A Business Creation in Post-Industrial Tourism Objects: Case of the Industrial Monuments Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertacchini, Enrico & Dalle Nogare, Chiara, 2014. "Public provision vs. outsourcing of cultural services: Evidence from Italian cities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-182.
    2. Victor Ginsburgh & Olivier Gergaud, 2013. "Measuring the effect of cultural events with special emphasis on music festivals," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/152437, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. David Throsby, 2011. "Cultural Capital," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse (ed.), A Handbook of Cultural Economics, Second Edition, chapter 20, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "World Heritage: Where Are We? An Empirical Analysis," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-31, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    5. Olivier Gergaud & Victor Ginsburgh, 2017. "Measuring the Economic Effects of Events Using Google Trends," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/277406, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Mihaela IACOB & Felicia ALEXANDRU & Meral KAGITCI & Georgiana Camelia CRETAN & Filip IORGULESCU, 2011. "Evaluation Of Cultural Heritage – From The Epistemological Precautions To Pragmatic Approaches," International Conference Modern Approaches in Organisational Management and Economy, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(1), pages 218-223, November.
    7. Gabriel Ahlfeldt & Kristoffer Möller & Sevrin Waights & Nicolai Wendland, 2012. "On prisoner's dilemmas and gilded cages: The economics of heritage preservation," ERSA conference papers ersa12p783, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Enrico Bertacchini & Federico Revelli, 2021. "Kalòs kai agathòs? government quality and cultural heritage in the regions of Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(2), pages 513-539, October.
    9. David Throsby, 2010. "Measuring the Economic and Cultural Values of Historic Heritage Places," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 1085, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    10. Christian Barrère, 2016. "Cultural heritages: From official to informal [Patrimoines culturels : des patrimoines officiels aux patrimoines informels]," Post-Print hal-02569029, HAL.
    11. Bruno S. Frey & Paolo Pamini, 2009. "Making World Heritage Truly Global: The Culture Certificate Scheme," CREMA Working Paper Series 2009-13, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    12. Agnese Amato & Maria Andreoli & Massimo Rovai, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building by Introducing New Functions: A Scenario Evaluation Based on Participatory MCA Applied to a Former Carthusian Monastery in Tuscany, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Iria Caamaño-Franco & María Andrade Suárez, 2020. "The Value Assessment and Planning of Industrial Mining Heritage as a Tourism Attraction: The Case of Las Médulas Cultural Space," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, October.
    14. Yan Zhang, 2012. "Towards an Institutional Approach of Self-governance on Cultural Heritage," Chapters, in: Enrico Bertacchini & Giangiacomo Bravo & Massimo Marrelli & Walter Santagata (ed.), Cultural Commons, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Patrizia Riganti, 2022. "Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation Applications to Cultural Capital: Does the Nature of the Goods Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Maija Halonen-Aktawijuka & Evanjelos Parfilis, 2022. "Who Should Own the Past?," Bristol Economics Discussion Papers 22/758, School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
    17. Elena Borin & Giulia Fantini, 2023. "Participatory Governance as a Success Factor in Equity Crowdfunding Campaigns for Cultural Heritage," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    18. Mateusz Naramski & Krzysztof Herman, 2019. "The Development of Mobile Tourism in the Upper Silesian Metropolitan Area of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    19. David Throsby & Anita Zednik & Jorge E. Araña, 2021. "Public preferences for heritage conservation strategies: a choice modelling approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 333-358, September.
    20. Ana Escalona-Orcao & Diego A. Barrado-Timón & Severino Escolano-Utrilla & Belén Sánchez-Valverde & Maricruz Navarro-Pérez & Mariola Pinillos-García & Luis Antonio Sáez-Pérez, 2020. "Cultural and Creative Ecosystems in Medium-Sized Cities: Evolution in Times of Economic Crisis and Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:6997-:d:833699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.