IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6882-d831885.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulations, Green Technology Innovation, and High-Quality Economic Development in China: Application of Mediation and Threshold Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Tao Lin

    (Office of Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China)

  • Lijun Wang

    (Archives and Achievements Service Center, Jiangsu Institute of Science and Technology Information, Nanjing 210042, China)

  • Jingbo Wu

    (Office of Science, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing 211169, China)

Abstract

In this article, we consider sample data from 30 regions in China from 2004 to 2020. We use the entropy method to measure the high-quality development level, then examine the intermediary and threshold effects to verify the main paths by which green technology innovation mediates the relationship between environmental regulation intensity and the quality of economic development. Our conclusions are as follows: (1) There is a “U”-shaped relationship between environmental regulation intensity and high-quality economic development. When the environmental regulation intensity is low, there is a negative (inhibitory) relationship between the two, while there is a positive (promoting) relationship when the intensity is high. Furthermore, a high proportion of secondary industries inhibit high-quality development, perfect infrastructure and information access can promote high-quality development, and excessive population density hinders high-quality development. (2) There also exists a “U”-shaped relationship between environmental regulation intensity and green technology innovation, which forms a co-directional change relationship. Green technology innovation has a significant mediating effect on the impact of environmental regulation intensity on high-quality economic development. (3) The threshold effect test confirms the existence of double thresholds. When the green technology innovation level is not high, environmental regulations inhibit high-quality economic development. However, when green technology innovation reaches a certain level, environmental regulations will promote high-quality economic development. This paper has certain theoretical reference for achieving high-quality development goals; thus, our results are expected to provide theoretical support for China’s high-quality development.

Suggested Citation

  • Tao Lin & Lijun Wang & Jingbo Wu, 2022. "Environmental Regulations, Green Technology Innovation, and High-Quality Economic Development in China: Application of Mediation and Threshold Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6882-:d:831885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6882/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6882/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry & Richard Lajeunesse, 2008. "Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 121-128, October.
    2. Ben Kheder, Sonia & Zugravu, Natalia, 2012. "Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 48-61.
    3. Victor Ajayi and David Reiner, 2020. "European Industrial Energy Intensity: Innovation, Environmental Regulation, and Price Effects," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 105-128.
    4. Arik Levinson & M. Scott Taylor, 2008. "Unmasking The Pollution Haven Effect," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 49(1), pages 223-254, February.
    5. Alexey Kuprianov, 2020. "GDP Upgrade: How Can One Measure the Quality of Economic Growth?," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, October.
    6. Yu-Shan Chen & Shyh-Bao Lai & Chao-Tung Wen, 2006. "The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 331-339, September.
    7. Nair, Mahendhiran & Arvin, Mak B. & Pradhan, Rudra P. & Bahmani, Sahar, 2021. "Is higher economic growth possible through better institutional quality and a lower carbon footprint? Evidence from developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 132-145.
    8. Hille, Erik & Althammer, Wilhelm & Diederich, Henning, 2020. "Environmental regulation and innovation in renewable energy technologies: Does the policy instrument matter?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Liguo, Xin & Ahmad, Manzoor & Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal, 2022. "Impact of innovation in marine energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. repec:clg:wpaper:2008-02 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Camila Gramkow & Annela Anger-Kraavi, 2018. "Could fiscal policies induce green innovation in developing countries? The case of Brazilian manufacturing sectors," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 246-257, February.
    12. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Sun, Chuanwang & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku, 2019. "Institutional quality, green innovation and energy efficiency," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Suki, Norazah Mohd & Suki, Norbayah Mohd & Afshan, Sahar & Sharif, Arshian & Meo, Muhammad Saeed, 2022. "The paradigms of technological innovation and renewables as a panacea for sustainable development: A pathway of going green," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1431-1439.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haoyang Lu & Alistair Hunt & Bruce Morley, 2024. "The Impact of Heterogeneous Environmental Regulation Tools on Economic Growth: Can Environmental Protection and Economic Growth Be Win-Win?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Chengyu Han & Dongwen Hua & Juan Li, 2023. "A View of Industrial Agglomeration, Air Pollution and Economic Sustainability from Spatial Econometric Analysis of 273 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Li, Huidi & Liu, Jiali & Wang, Huiru, 2024. "Impact of green technology innovation on the quality of regional economic development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 463-476.
    4. Zhicheng Duan & Tingting Tang, 2022. "Quantitative Simulation and Verification of the Coordination Curves between Sustainable Development and Green Innovation Efficiency: From the Perspective of Urban Agglomerations Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Jinhuang Mao & Zhenyu Wang & Tianyang Ma, 2023. "Dynamic Evolution of High-Quality Economic Development Levels: Regional Differences and Distribution in West China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    6. Zhiping Song & Peishan Tong, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Human Sustainable Development: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    7. Bie, Fan & Zhou, Luyao & Liu, Shuo & Yang, Tao, 2024. "Government digital transformation, resource curse and green total factor energy efficiency in Chinese cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Yan Mei & Jingyi Miao & Yuhui Lu, 2022. "Digital Villages Construction Accelerates High-Quality Economic Development in Rural China through Promoting Digital Entrepreneurship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    9. Di Zhu & Chang Liu & Yong Dong & Junguo Hua, 2022. "The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Environmental Governance Behavior and Its Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Khurshid, Adnan & Huang, Yupei & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Khan, Khalid, 2024. "Beyond borders: Assessing the transboundary effects of environmental regulation on technological development in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Lan Khanh Chu, 2023. "Environmentally related technologies and environmental regulations in promoting renewable energy: evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 177-197, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Wang & Lili Feng & Jin Li & Lin Wang, 2020. "Environmental Regulation, Tenure Length of Officials, and Green Innovation of Enterprises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Fangming Xie & Yali Liu & Mengman Yang, 2023. "Spatial spillover effect of environmental regulation on regional economic growth," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 7149-7160, July.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2vteelu0n785l82j764n6ul273 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Marin, Giovanni & Vona, Francesco, 2019. "Climate policies and skill-biased employment dynamics: Evidence from EU countries," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    5. Qiong Yao & Suzhen Zeng & Shibin Sheng & Shiyuan Gong, 2021. "Green innovation and brand equity: moderating effects of industrial institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 573-602, June.
    6. Wu, Haoyi & Guo, Huanxiu & Zhang, Bing & Bu, Maoliang, 2017. "Westward movement of new polluting firms in China: Pollution reduction mandates and location choice," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 119-138.
    7. Lahcene Makhloufi & Abderrazak Ahmed Laghouag & Tang Meirun & Fateh Belaid, 2022. "Impact of green entrepreneurship orientation on environmental performance: The natural resource‐based view and environmental policy perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 425-444, January.
    8. Paulius Šūmakaris & Renata Korsakienė & Deniss Ščeulovs, 2021. "Determinants of Energy Efficient Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Alexandre Rodrigues da Silva & Claudia Brito Silva Cirani & Fernando Antonio Ribeiro Serra & Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende da Costa & Isabel Cristina Scafuto & Roberto Lima Ruas & Marcos Rogério , 2023. "Determining Factors on Green Innovation Adoption: An Empirical Study in Brazilian Agribusiness Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Liu, Bin & Gan, Lu & Huang, Kun & Hu, Shiyang, 2023. "The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on corporate green innovation: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    11. Chen Liu & Dongmin Kong, 2021. "Business strategy and sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 657-670, January.
    12. Die Hu & Yuandi Wang & Yu Li, 2017. "How Does Open Innovation Modify the Relationship between Environmental Regulations and Productivity?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1132-1143, December.
    13. Qian Zhou & Meng Shi & Qi Huang & Tao Shi, 2021. "Do Double-Edged Swords Cut Both Ways? The Role of Technology Innovation and Resource Consumption in Environmental Regulation and Economic Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Yu Hao & Yunxia Guo & Haitao Wu, 2022. "The role of information and communication technology on green total factor energy efficiency: Does environmental regulation work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 403-424, January.
    15. Xiaoning Zhang & Mei Qu, 2020. "Impact of Environmental Regulation on Scientific and Technological Competitiveness of Resource-Based Cities in China—Based on Panel Data of 33 Resource-Based Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Zhang, Dan & Zheng, Mingbo & Feng, Gen-Fu & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Does an environmental policy bring to green innovation in renewable energy?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1113-1124.
    17. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5ahh4t5kfl8nprei89ignlk5nl is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Kneller, Richard & Manderson, Edward, 2012. "Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 211-235.
    19. Abay Mulatu, 2017. "The Structure of UK Outbound FDI and Environmental Regulation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(1), pages 65-96, September.
    20. Parvez Alam Khan & Satirenjit Kaur Johl & Shireenjit K. Johl, 2021. "Does adoption of ISO 56002‐2019 and green innovation reporting enhance the firm sustainable development goal performance? An emerging paradigm," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2922-2936, November.
    21. Sun, Chuanwang & Zhan, Yanhong & Gao, Xiang, 2023. "Does environmental regulation increase domestic value-added in exports? An empirical study of cleaner production standards in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    22. Xue Yang & Yuandi Wang & Die Hu & Yongqiang Gao, 2018. "How industry peers improve your sustainable development? The role of listed firms in environmental strategies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1313-1333, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6882-:d:831885. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.