IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6719-d828585.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geomechanical Behaviour of Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste Submitted to Accelerated Wear

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Paula Secco

    (Centro de Química–Vila Real (CQ-VR), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Giovani Jordi Bruschi

    (Centro de Química–Vila Real (CQ-VR), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

  • Castorina S. Vieira

    (CONSTRUCT, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal)

  • Nuno Cristelo

    (Centro de Química–Vila Real (CQ-VR), University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal)

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the most important sectors for economic and social development. However, it is responsible for more than 50% of the depletion of natural resources, for 40% of the energy consumption and construction and demolition waste (CDW) accounting for 30–60% of the total municipal solid waste generated worldwide. In this sense, the recycling of CDW is considered a safe alternative to the current trend, which can produce environmental and economic benefits, namely the reduction of the depletion of natural resources and the volume of waste sent to landfills. Some studies have shown promising results in the use of recycled CDW as geotechnical materials. However, the degradation performance induced by the construction procedures and weather conditions on the geotechnical behaviour of recycled CDW is still a research gap, creating an obstacle for its regular use in general engineering practice. This work evaluated the mechanical performance of recycled CDW over time when subjected to wetting–drying degradation cycles under different temperature and pH conditions. The effects of such degradation were then evaluated qualitatively (changes in particle size distribution and Proctor parameters) and quantitatively (stress–strain response and permeability). The results showed that 10 wetting–drying cycles and different compaction energies have no change in the particle size distribution of CDW compared to the original CDW. The shear strength parameters were very similar for the different degradation conditions except when different pH values were used, which may have weakened the grains and decrease the friction angle of the material. Regarding the permeability, all tested samples were classified in the same hydraulic conductivity range (very low) without significant changes induced by the degradation mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Paula Secco & Giovani Jordi Bruschi & Castorina S. Vieira & Nuno Cristelo, 2022. "Geomechanical Behaviour of Recycled Construction and Demolition Waste Submitted to Accelerated Wear," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6719-:d:828585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6719/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6719/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cesar Hidalgo & Gloria Carvajal & Fredy Muñoz, 2019. "Laboratory Evaluation of Finely Milled Brick Debris as a Soil Stabilizer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Vieira, Castorina Silva & Pereira, Paulo M., 2015. "Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 192-204.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nakhon Kokkaew & Vachara Peansupap & Noppadon Jokkaw, 2022. "An Empirical Examination of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning as Mediating Variables between HRM and Sustainable Organizational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Hassan Saad & Haslinda Nahazanan & Badronnisa Yusuf & Siti Fauziah Toha & Ahmed Alnuaim & Ahmed El-Mouchi & Mohamed Elseknidy & Angham Ali Mohammed, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques and Applications in Soil Improvement Using Green Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-37, June.
    2. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Foley, Aoife M. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the ceramics industry: A systematic and critical review of policy options, developments and sociotechnical systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Ecem Nur Barisoglu & Jannes Meeusen & Diederik Snoeck & Ramiro Daniel Verástegui-Flores & Gemmina Di Emidio, 2023. "Feasibility of Using Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials for Deep Soil Mixing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.
    4. Jin, Ruoyu & Li, Bo & Zhou, Tongyu & Wanatowski, Dariusz & Piroozfar, Poorang, 2017. "An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-98.
    5. Enrico Quagliarini & Marta Carosi & Stefano Lenci, 2023. "Novel Sustainable Masonry from Ancient Construction Techniques by Reusing Waste Modern Tiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Hongyu Long & Hongyong Liu & Xingwei Li & Longjun Chen, 2020. "An Evolutionary Game Theory Study for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Considering Green Development Performance under the Chinese Government’s Reward–Penalty Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-21, August.
    7. Luorui Zheng & Yingzhen Li & Cheng Qian & Yanjun Du, 2023. "Carbon Emission Evaluation of Roadway Construction at Contaminated Sites Based on Life Cycle Assessment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Paulo Miguel Pereira & Castorina Silva Vieira, 2022. "A Literature Review on the Use of Recycled Construction and Demolition Materials in Unbound Pavement Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-28, October.
    9. Rafael Robayo-Salazar & William Valencia-Saavedra & Ruby Mejía de Gutiérrez, 2022. "Reuse of Powders and Recycled Aggregates from Mixed Construction and Demolition Waste in Alkali-Activated Materials and Precast Concrete Units," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Zhikun Ding & Wanqi Nie & Huanyu Wu, 2022. "Investigating the connection between stakeholders’ purchase intention and perceived value of construction and demolition waste recycled products," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 9285-9303, July.
    11. Youli Lin & Farshid Maghool & Arul Arulrajah & Suksun Horpibulsuk, 2021. "Engineering Characteristics and Environmental Risks of Utilizing Recycled Aluminum Salt Slag and Recycled Concrete as a Sustainable Geomaterial," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Michael Z. Izzo & Marta Miletić, 2019. "Sustainable Improvement of the Crack Resistance of Cohesive Soils," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    13. Li Wang & Yanhong Lv & Siyu Huang & Yu Liu & Xinrong Li, 2023. "The Evolution of Research on C&D Waste and Sustainable Development of Resources: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6719-:d:828585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.