IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6400-d822858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Research on the Ecological Operation of Reservoirs Based on the Indicators of Hydrological Alteration

Author

Listed:
  • Dongyang Han

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Education Ministry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Xinjiang Jinghe Observation and Research Station of Temperate Desert Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Guanghui Lv

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Education Ministry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Xinjiang Jinghe Observation and Research Station of Temperate Desert Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Xuemin He

    (College of Ecology and Environment, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Key Laboratory of Oasis Ecology of Education Ministry, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Xinjiang Jinghe Observation and Research Station of Temperate Desert Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Urumqi 830046, China)

Abstract

The conventional reservoir operation strategy considering hydropower production ignores the ecology of the downstream rivers and causes a series of environmental problems. To ensure the sustainable development of a reservoir, the operation strategy should consider both the economic benefits of the power station and the ecological benefits in downstream rivers, the key to which is to select suitable parameters for quantifying the ecological objectives of the rivers and incorporate them into the reservoir operation model. To this end, the ecological index (EI) based on the Indicators of Hydrological Alteration (IHA) was developed to reflect the ecology of the downstream rivers, and a reservoir ecological operation model that takes into account the power generation capacity of the power station and the degree of hydrological alteration was constructed, which can be solved using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). The results show that the mean EI values increase a lot, from 0.24 to 0.62, after the construction of reservoir, and the optimal reservoir operation strategy in each typical year can reduce the hydrological alteration significantly (the reduction rates of both the abundant and dry water years exceed 20%), while ensuring the hydropower production of the power station (the reduction rates of hydropower production are just 1.64%, 3.15%, and 3.16% for abundant, normal, and dry water years, respectively), which provides a good reference for restoring the natural hydrological situation of downstream rivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongyang Han & Guanghui Lv & Xuemin He, 2022. "A Research on the Ecological Operation of Reservoirs Based on the Indicators of Hydrological Alteration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6400-:d:822858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Majid Mohammadi & Saeed Farzin & Sayed-Farhad Mousavi & Hojat Karami, 2019. "Investigation of a New Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Performance in the Optimal Operation of Multi-Reservoir Benchmark Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(14), pages 4767-4782, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behrang Beiranvand & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Optimization of Dams Reservoir Operation Using the Meta-heuristic Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(9), pages 3457-3526, July.
    2. Suzlyana Marhain & Ali Najah Ahmed & Muhammad Ary Murti & Pavitra Kumar & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2021. "Investigating the application of artificial intelligence for earthquake prediction in Terengganu," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 977-999, August.
    3. Aadhityaa Mohanavelu & Bankaru-Swamy Soundharajan & Ozgur Kisi, 2022. "Modeling Multi-objective Pareto-optimal Reservoir Operation Policies Using State-of-the-art Modeling Techniques," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 36(9), pages 3107-3128, July.
    4. Ahmadianfar, Iman & Samadi-Koucheksaraee, Arvin & Razavi, Saman, 2023. "Design of optimal operating rule curves for hydropower multi-reservoir systems by an influential optimization method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 508-521.
    5. Sarmad Dashti Latif & Suzlyana Marhain & Md Shabbir Hossain & Ali Najah Ahmed & Mohsen Sherif & Ahmed Sefelnasr & Ahmed El-Shafie, 2021. "Optimizing the Operation Release Policy Using Charged System Search Algorithm: A Case Study of Klang Gates Dam, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Mahdi Valikhan Anaraki & Saeed Farzin & Sayed-Farhad Mousavi & Hojat Karami, 2021. "Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change Impacts on Flood Frequency by Using Hybrid Machine Learning Methods," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 199-223, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6400-:d:822858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.