IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6385-d822448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining Numerical Simulations, Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Sampling Algorithms to Build Surrogate Models and Calculate the Probability of Failure of Urban Tunnels

Author

Listed:
  • Vinícius Resende Domingues

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Luan Carlos de Sena Monteiro Ozelim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • André Pacheco de Assis

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

  • André Luís Brasil Cavalcante

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasilia, Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

When it is necessary to evaluate, with a probabilistic approach, the interaction of urban tunnels with neighboring structures, computational power is an important challenge for numerical models. Thus, intelligent sampling algorithms can be allies in obtaining a better knowledge of the result’s domain, even if in possession of a smaller number of samples. In any case, when sampling is limited, the evaluation of the risks is also restricted. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) can fill an important gap in risk analysis by interpolating results and generating larger samples quickly. The goal of the AI algorithm is to find an approximation function (also called a surrogate model) that reproduces the original numerical simulation behavior and can be evaluated much faster. This function is constructed by performing multiple simulations at special points obtained by intelligent sampling techniques. This paper used a hypothetical case to validate the methodological proposal. It concerns the sequential excavation of a tunnel, about three diameters deep, interacting with a seven-story building. First, the three-dimensional numerical model (FEM) was solved deterministically, and then its domain and mesh were refined. After that, another 170 solutions were numerically obtained from FEM software, strategically sampling the random variables involved. Sequentially, based on 31 artificial intelligence techniques, it was evaluated which variables were of greatest importance in predicting the magnitude of vertical displacement in the foundation elements of a surrounding building. Then, once the most important variables were selected, the 31 artificial intelligence techniques were again trained and tested to define the one with the least R-squared. Finally, using this best-fit algorithm, it was possible to calculate the probability of failure using massive samples, with sizes on the order of 10 7 . These samples were used to illustrate the convergence of the Simple Monte Carlo Sampling (MC) and Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS). The main contribution of this paper is methodological; therefore, this new procedure can be aggregated to state-of-the-art risk assessment methodologies in tunnel-related problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Vinícius Resende Domingues & Luan Carlos de Sena Monteiro Ozelim & André Pacheco de Assis & André Luís Brasil Cavalcante, 2022. "Combining Numerical Simulations, Artificial Intelligence and Intelligent Sampling Algorithms to Build Surrogate Models and Calculate the Probability of Failure of Urban Tunnels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6385-:d:822448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6385/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6385/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Batmaz, Inci & Tunali, Semra, 2003. "Small response surface designs for metamodel estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 455-470, March.
    2. Grosso, A. & Jamali, A.R.M.J.U. & Locatelli, M., 2009. "Finding maximin latin hypercube designs by Iterated Local Search heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 541-547, September.
    3. Crombecq, K. & Laermans, E. & Dhaene, T., 2011. "Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 683-696, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grzegorz Kacprzak & Mateusz Frydrych & Paweł Nowak, 2023. "Influence of Load–Settlement Relationship of Intermediate Foundation Pile Group on Numerical Analysis of a Skyscraper under Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bozağaç, Doruk & Batmaz, İnci & Oğuztüzün, Halit, 2016. "Dynamic simulation metamodeling using MARS: A case of radar simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 69-86.
    2. Crombecq, K. & Laermans, E. & Dhaene, T., 2011. "Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 683-696, November.
    3. Nicholas Davey & Nicolas Langrené & Wen Chen & Jonathan R. Rhodes & Simon Dunstall & Saman Halgamuge, 2023. "Designing higher value roads to preserve species at risk by optimally controlling traffic flow," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 663-693, January.
    4. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    5. Jing Zhang & Jin Xu & Kai Jia & Yimin Yin & Zhengming Wang, 2019. "Optimal Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs with Slices of Arbitrary Run Sizes," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. János Pintér & Zoltán Horváth, 2013. "Integrated experimental design and nonlinear optimization to handle computationally expensive models under resource constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 191-215, September.
    7. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    8. Liuqing Yang & Yongdao Zhou & Min-Qian Liu, 2021. "Maximin distance designs based on densest packings," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(5), pages 615-634, July.
    9. Fajemisin, Adejuyigbe O. & Maragno, Donato & den Hertog, Dick, 2024. "Optimization with constraint learning: A framework and survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 1-14.
    10. A. Jourdan & J. Franco, 2010. "Optimal Latin hypercube designs for the Kullback–Leibler criterion," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 94(4), pages 341-351, December.
    11. Xiongxiong You & Mengya Zhang & Diyin Tang & Zhanwen Niu, 2022. "An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 160-172, February.
    12. Pengfei Gao & Xinggang Yan & Yao Wang & Hongwei Li & Mei Zhan & Fei Ma & Mingwang Fu, 2023. "An online intelligent method for roller path design in conventional spinning," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(8), pages 3429-3444, December.
    13. Koziel, Slawomir & Pietrenko-Dabrowska, Anna, 2022. "Constrained multi-objective optimization of compact microwave circuits by design triangulation and pareto front interpolation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 302-312.
    14. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Zuo, Ming J. & Zhou, Chengning, 2018. "A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 330-338.
    15. Gao, Yanping & Yi, Siyu & Zhou, Yongdao, 2022. "Maximin L1-distance Range-fixed Level-augmented designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    16. Tonghui Pang & Yan Wang & Jian-Feng Yang, 2022. "Asymptotically optimal maximin distance Latin hypercube designs," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 85(4), pages 405-418, May.
    17. Roy, Pamphile T. & Jofre, Lluís & Jouhaud, Jean-Christophe & Cuenot, Bénédicte, 2020. "Versatile sequential sampling algorithm using Kernel Density Estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 201-211.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6385-:d:822448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.