IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6050-d816911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planning, Optimisation and Evaluation of Small Power-to-Gas-to-Power Systems: Case Study of a German Dairy

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Schmeling

    (KEHAG Energiehandel GmbH, Im Technologiepark 4, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
    German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
    Current address: Lintas Green Energy GmbH, Alter Stadthafen 3b, 26122 Oldenburg, Germany.)

  • Alexander August Ionnis Buchholz

    (New Power Pack GmbH, Kopernikusstraße 23, 49377 Vechta, Germany)

  • Hilmer Heineke

    (New Power Pack GmbH, Kopernikusstraße 23, 49377 Vechta, Germany)

  • Peter Klement

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Benedikt Hanke

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

  • Karsten von Maydell

    (German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Str. 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany)

Abstract

In the course of the energy transition, distributed, hybrid energy systems, such as the combination of photovoltaic (PV) and battery storages, is increasingly being used for economic and ecological reasons. However, renewable electricity generation is highly volatile, and storage capacity is usually limited. Nowadays, a new storage component is emerging: the power-to-gas-to-power (PtGtP) technology, which is able to store electricity in the form of hydrogen even over longer periods of time. Although this technology is technically well understood and developed, there are hardly any evaluations and feasibility studies of its widespread integration into current distributed energy systems under realistic legal and economic market conditions. In order to be able to give such an assessment, we develop a methodology and model that optimises the sizing and operation of a PtGtP system as part of a hybrid energy system under current German market conditions. The evaluation is based on a multi-criteria approach optimising for both costs and CO 2 emissions. For this purpose, a brute-force-based optimal design approach is used to determine optimal system sizes, combined with the energy system simulation tool oemof.solph . In order to gain further insights into this technology and its future prospects, a sensitivity analysis is carried out. The methodology is used to examine the case study of a German dairy and shows that PtGtP is not yet profitable but promising.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Schmeling & Alexander August Ionnis Buchholz & Hilmer Heineke & Peter Klement & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell, 2022. "Planning, Optimisation and Evaluation of Small Power-to-Gas-to-Power Systems: Case Study of a German Dairy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6050-:d:816911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2016. "Energy for Sustainable Development," Conference Proceedings 253270, Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies (IDSAsr).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schmeling, Lucas & Schönfeldt, Patrik & Klement, Peter & Vorspel, Lena & Hanke, Benedikt & von Maydell, Karsten & Agert, Carsten, 2022. "A generalised optimal design methodology for distributed energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1223-1239.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Villanthenkodath, Muhammed Ashiq & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar, 2021. "Does economic growth respond to electricity consumption asymmetrically in Bangladesh? The implication for environmental sustainability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Hoang, Thi Hong Van & Mahalik, Mantu Kumar & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 199-212.
    3. Schlör, Holger & Venghaus, Sandra & Hake, Jürgen-Friedrich, 2018. "The FEW-Nexus city index – Measuring urban resilience," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 382-392.
    4. Mollik, Sazib & Rashid, M.M. & Hasanuzzaman, M. & Karim, M.E. & Hosenuzzaman, M., 2016. "Prospects, progress, policies, and effects of rural electrification in Bangladesh," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 553-567.
    5. Obsatar Sinaga & Mohd Haizam Mohd Saudi & Djoko Roespinoedji & Mohd Shahril Ahmad Razimi, 2019. "The Dynamic Relationship between Natural Gas and Economic Growth: Evidence from Indonesia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 388-394.
    6. Asongu, Simplice A. & Odhiambo, Nicholas M., 2021. "Inequality, finance and renewable energy consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1), pages 678-688.
    7. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.
    8. Teng, Meixuan & Burke, Paul J. & Liao, Hua, 2019. "The demand for coal among China's rural households: Estimates of price and income elasticities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 928-936.
    9. Wan-Lin Yong & Jerome Kueh & Yong Sze Wei & Jang-Haw Tiang, 2020. "Energy Consumption and Economic Growth Nexus in China: Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL)," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 194212-1942, December.
    10. Ruqayya Ibraheem & Ismat Nasim, 2021. "Globalization, Energy Use and Environmental Degradation in Thailand," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Association for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 01-11, June.
    11. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Low-Carbon and Sustainable, Efficient Technology: Strategies and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Sadeq Hooshmand Zaferani & Mehdi Jafarian & Daryoosh Vashaee & Reza Ghomashchi, 2021. "Thermal Management Systems and Waste Heat Recycling by Thermoelectric Generators—An Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Setterberg, Hanna & Sjöström, Emma, 2021. "Action Lab: Integrated Communications on Financial and ESG Performance in the Earnings Call," Misum Working Paper Series 2021-1, Stockholm School of Economics, Mistra Center for Sustainable Markets (Misum).
    14. Ouyang, Yaofu & Li, Peng, 2018. "On the nexus of financial development, economic growth, and energy consumption in China: New perspective from a GMM panel VAR approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 238-252.
    15. Muhammad Shahbaz & Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad & Mantu Kumar Mahalik & Perry Sadorsky, 2018. "How strong is the causal relationship between globalization and energy consumption in developed economies? A country-specific time-series and panel analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(13), pages 1479-1494, March.
    16. Anandkumar Balasubramaniam & Anand Paul & Won-Hwa Hong & HyunCheol Seo & Jeong Hong Kim, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Intelligent Transportation Systems for Sustainable Environment in Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Sinha, Avik & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2018. "Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 703-711.
    18. Miriam Müller & Oscar Reutter, 2017. "Vision Development towards a Sustainable North Rhine-Westphalia 2030 in a Science-Practice-Dialogue," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-27, June.
    19. Erik Lundsgaarde & Niels Keijzer, 2019. "Development Cooperation in a Multilevel and Multistakeholder Setting: From Planning towards Enabling Coordinated Action?," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 31(2), pages 215-234, April.
    20. Simshauser, P., 2019. "On the impact of government-initiated CfD’s in Australia’s National Electricity Market," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1901, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6050-:d:816911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.