IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6039-d816718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a Smart City Logistics Assessment Framework (SCLAF): A Conceptual Tool for Identifying the Level of Smartness of a City Logistics System

Author

Listed:
  • Elpida Xenou

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences Information Systems and e-Business Laboratory (ISeB), University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156 Str., 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Michael Madas

    (Department of Applied Informatics, School of Information Sciences Information Systems and e-Business Laboratory (ISeB), University of Macedonia, Egnatia 156 Str., 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgia Ayfandopoulou

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Hellenic Institute of Transport, 6th km Charilaou Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

One of the main building blocks for sustainable cities is the development and efficient operation of a viable and sustainable city logistics system. City logistics exhibit several practical complications due to the conflicting interests of multiple actors involved, as well as the vague role or reluctant involvement of the public sector. Despite the plethora of innovative city logistics initiatives developed in European cities and European policy priorities towards the promotion of smart cities, little is known about the level of smartness of city logistics systems in Europe. In response to that, this paper proposes a conceptual multi-criteria and multi-assessment framework as a guidance tool for city planners, aiming to support the in-depth understanding of the main components of a smart city logistics ecosystem and facilitate the self-assessment of a city’s level of smartness. The proposed framework represents a four-level hierarchical assessment pyramid involving four main impact areas: (i) smart governance, (ii) smart economy, (iii) smart actors, and (iv) smart environment. A more in-depth analysis of each impact area is separately conducted by deconstructing the impact areas in specific criteria, sub-criteria, and KPIs. This paper presents in detail the methodology followed and the main components of this tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Elpida Xenou & Michael Madas & Georgia Ayfandopoulou, 2022. "Developing a Smart City Logistics Assessment Framework (SCLAF): A Conceptual Tool for Identifying the Level of Smartness of a City Logistics System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6039-:d:816718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eiichi Taniguchi & Rob E.C.M. Van Der Heijden, 2000. "An evaluation methodology for city logistics," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 65-90, January.
    2. Russo, Francesco & Comi, Antonio, 2011. "A model system for the ex-ante assessment of city logistics measures," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 81-87.
    3. Stathopoulos, Amanda & Valeri, Eva & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2012. "Stakeholder reactions to urban freight policy innovation," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 34-45.
    4. Vito Albino & Umberto Berardi & Rosa Maria Dangelico, 2015. "Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.
    5. Franceschetti, Anna & Honhon, Dorothée & Laporte, Gilbert & Woensel, Tom Van & Fransoo, Jan C., 2017. "Strategic fleet planning for city logistics," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 19-40.
    6. Dablanc, Laetitia, 2007. "Goods transport in large European cities: Difficult to organize, difficult to modernize," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 280-285, March.
    7. Liviu Gabriel CRETU, 2012. "Smart Cities Design using Event-driven Paradigm and Semantic Web," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(4), pages 57-67.
    8. Shao, Saijun & Xu, Gangyan & Li, Ming & Huang, George Q., 2019. "Synchronizing e-commerce city logistics with sliding time windows," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 17-28.
    9. Perboli, Guido & Brotcorne, Luce & Bruni, Maria Elena & Rosano, Mariangela, 2021. "A new model for Last-Mile Delivery and Satellite Depots management: The impact of the on-demand economy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lindawati & Johan van Schagen & Mark Goh & Robert de Souza, 2014. "Collaboration in urban logistics: motivations and barriers," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 278-290, July.
    2. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    3. Jonathan Cowie & Keith Fisken, 2023. "Urban freight policy maturity and sustainable logistics: are they related?," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Zachary Spicer & Nicole Goodman & Nathan Olmstead, 2021. "The frontier of digital opportunity: Smart city implementation in small, rural and remote communities in Canada," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 535-558, February.
    5. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Radosław Wolniak, 2022. "Sharing Economies’ Initiatives in Municipal Authorities’ Perspective: Research Evidence from Poland in the Context of Smart Cities’ Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Margarida Rodrigues & Mário Franco, 2020. "Measuring the urban sustainable development in cities through a Composite Index: The case of Portugal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 507-520, July.
    7. Ballantyne, Erica E.F. & Lindholm, Maria & Whiteing, Anthony, 2013. "A comparative study of urban freight transport planning: addressing stakeholder needs," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 93-101.
    8. Mepparambath, Rakhi Manohar & Cheah, Lynette & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2021. "A theoretical framework to evaluate the traffic impact of urban freight consolidation centres," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    9. Sung-Su Jo & Hoon Han & Yountaik Leem & Sang-Ho Lee, 2021. "Sustainable Smart Cities and Industrial Ecosystem: Structural and Relational Changes of the Smart City Industries in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Maria Lindholm, 2013. "Urban freight transport from a local authority perspective – a literature review," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 54, pages 1-3.
    11. Csukás Máté Szilárd & Roland Z. Szabó, 2018. "Factors Hindering Smart City Developments in Medium-Sized Cities," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 14(01), pages 3-14.
    12. Kyunghun Min & Moonyoung Yoon & Katsunori Furuya, 2019. "A Comparison of a Smart City’s Trends in Urban Planning before and after 2016 through Keyword Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, June.
    13. Vidal Vieira, José Geraldo & Fransoo, Jan C., 2015. "How logistics performance of freight operators is affected by urban freight distribution issues," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 37-47.
    14. Jagienka Rześny-Cieplińska & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019. "Assessment of the Crowd Logistics Solutions—The Stakeholders’ Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Orhan, Cosku Can & Goez, Julio Cesar & Guajardo, Mario & Osicka, Ondrej & Wallace, Stein W., 2024. "Assessing macro effects of freight consolidation on the livability of small cities using vehicle routing as micro models: The case of Bergen, Norway," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Taufiq Suryo Nugroho & Chandra Balijepalli & Anthony Whiteing, 2021. "Independent Retailer Restocking Choices in Urban Goods Movement and Interaction Effects with Traditional Markets," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 933-969, December.
    17. Jacek Rudewicz, 2023. "Smart City Concept and Sustainable Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 418-430.
    18. Justyna Lemke & Roma Strulak-Wojcikiewicz, 2021. "Using Six Sigma in the Management of City Logistics Processes: A Case Study on the Impact Assessment of Transport Infrastructure on Fuel Consumption in Szczecin," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 1152-1177.
    19. Hodžić Sabina & Paleka Hana, 2020. "Fiscal Capacities of Large Cities in Croatia – Financial Support for Smart Cities," Naše gospodarstvo/Our economy, Sciendo, vol. 66(2), pages 42-49, June.
    20. Jacek Oskarbski & Daniel Kaszubowski, 2018. "Applying a Mesoscopic Transport Model to Analyse the Effects of Urban Freight Regulatory Measures on Transport Emissions—An Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6039-:d:816718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.