IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p5904-d814635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ornamental Stone Processing Waste Incorporated in the Production of Mortars: Technological Influence and Environmental Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pamella Inácio Moreira

    (Civil Engineering Laboratory, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

  • Josinaldo de Oliveira Dias

    (Forest and Wood Sciences Department, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Victoria 29075-910, Brazil)

  • Gustavo de Castro Xavier

    (Civil Engineering Laboratory, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

  • Carlos Maurício Vieira

    (Laboratory of Advanced Materials, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

  • Jonas Alexandre

    (Civil Engineering Laboratory, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

  • Sergio Neves Monteiro

    (Department of Material Sciences, Military Engineering Institute, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, Brazil)

  • Rogério Pinto Ribeiro

    (São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azevedo

    (Civil Engineering Laboratory, State University of the Northern Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil)

Abstract

The technological performance and environmental advantages of replacing sand by ornamental stone processing waste (OSPW) in the production of mortars for civil construction were studied. Technological properties associated with the standard consistency index, squeeze flow and bulk densities as well as the determination of water retention and calorimetry analysis were evaluated in the mortars’ fresh state, whereas capillarity tests as well as mechanical resistance by flexural and compression tests were determined in the hardened state for mortars incorporated with 10, 30 and 60 wt.% of OSPW substituting sand. Three different types of Portland Cements were considered in the incorporated mortars production. For these mortars environmental analysis, their corresponding life cycle assessment results were compared to that of conventional waste-free (0% OSPW) control mortar. It was found that the OPSW incorporation acts as nucleation sites favoring a hydration process, which culminates after 28 days of curing in the formation of more stable phases identified as hydrated calcium silicates by X-ray diffraction (XRD) amorphous halo. It was also revealed that both flexural and compression improved resistance for the incorporated mortars after 28 curing days. In particular, the calorimetry and XRD results explained the better mechanical resistance (12 MPa) of the 30 wt.% OSPW incorporated mortar, hardened with Portland Cement V, compared not only to the control, but also to the other incorporated mortars. As for the environmental analysis, the replacement of sand by OSPW contributed to the reduction in associated impacts in the categories of land use (−5%); freshwater eutrophication (−9%); marine eutrophication (−6%) and global warming (−5%).

Suggested Citation

  • Pamella Inácio Moreira & Josinaldo de Oliveira Dias & Gustavo de Castro Xavier & Carlos Maurício Vieira & Jonas Alexandre & Sergio Neves Monteiro & Rogério Pinto Ribeiro & Afonso Rangel Garcez de Azev, 2022. "Ornamental Stone Processing Waste Incorporated in the Production of Mortars: Technological Influence and Environmental Performance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5904-:d:814635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/5904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malça, João & Freire, Fausto, 2006. "Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(15), pages 3362-3380.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Malça, João & Coelho, António & Freire, Fausto, 2014. "Environmental life-cycle assessment of rapeseed-based biodiesel: Alternative cultivation systems and locations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 837-844.
    3. Puca, Antonio & Carrano, Marco & Liu, Gengyuan & Musella, Dimitri & Ripa, Maddalena & Viglia, Silvio & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2017. "Energy and eMergy assessment of the production and operation of a personal computer," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 124-136.
    4. Castanheira, Érica Geraldes & Acevedo, Helmer & Freire, Fausto, 2014. "Greenhouse gas intensity of palm oil produced in Colombia addressing alternative land use change and fertilization scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 958-967.
    5. van der Hilst, F. & Lesschen, J.P. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Riksen, M. & Verweij, P.A. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Spatial variation of environmental impacts of regional biomass chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 2053-2069.
    6. William Stafford & Adrian Lotter & Alan Brent & Graham von Maltitz, 2017. "Biofuels technology: A look forward," WIDER Working Paper Series 087, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Yang, Q. & Chen, G.Q., 2013. "Greenhouse gas emissions of corn–ethanol production in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 176-184.
    8. Dijkman, T.J. & Benders, R.M.J., 2010. "Comparison of renewable fuels based on their land use using energy densities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3148-3155, December.
    9. Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S. & Thonern, Werner I. & Caballero, Jose A., 2007. "A mathematical model for the composition of Brazilian ethanol shares for exportation to be blended to gasoline," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 5060-5063, October.
    10. Geraldes Castanheira, Érica & Grisoli, Renata & Freire, Fausto & Pecora, Vanessa & Coelho, Suani Teixeira, 2014. "Environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 680-691.
    11. Jegannathan, Kenthorai Raman & Chan, Eng-Seng & Ravindra, Pogaku, 2009. "Harnessing biofuels: A global Renaissance in energy production?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 2163-2168, October.
    12. Cherubini, Francesco & Strømman, Anders Hammer & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2011. "Influence of allocation methods on the environmental performance of biorefinery products—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(11), pages 1070-1077.
    13. Chen, G.Q. & Yang, Q. & Zhao, Y.H., 2011. "Renewability of wind power in China: A case study of nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emission by a plant in Guangxi," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 2322-2329, June.
    14. Castillo Santiago, York & Martínez González, Aldemar & Venturini, Osvaldo J. & Sphaier, Leandro A. & Ocampo Batlle, Eric A., 2022. "Energetic and environmental assessment of oil sludge use in a gasifier/gas microturbine system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    15. Malça, João & Freire, Fausto, 2011. "Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 338-351, January.
    16. Segovia, José J. & Villamañán, Rosa M. & Martín, M. Carmen & Chamorro, César R. & Villamañán, Miguel A., 2010. "Thermodynamic characterization of bio-fuels: Excess functions for binary mixtures containing ETBE and hydrocarbons," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 759-763.
    17. Yang, Q. & Chen, G.Q., 2012. "Nonrenewable energy cost of corn-ethanol in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 340-347.
    18. Piastrellini, Roxana & Arena, Alejandro Pablo & Civit, Bárbara, 2017. "Energy life-cycle analysis of soybean biodiesel: Effects of tillage and water management," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 13-20.
    19. Balat, Mustafa & Balat, Havva, 2009. "Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(11), pages 2273-2282, November.
    20. Avami, Akram, 2013. "Assessment of optimal biofuel supply chain planning in Iran: Technical, economic, and agricultural perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 761-768.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:5904-:d:814635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.