IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p73-d708396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust Optimization Model for Single Line Dynamic Bus Dispatching

Author

Listed:
  • Yingxin Liu

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
    Graduate School, Shenyang University, Shenyang 110044, China)

  • Xinggang Luo

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

  • Xu Wei

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

  • Yang Yu

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

  • Jiafu Tang

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China)

Abstract

For effective bus operations, it is important to flexibly arrange the departure times of buses at the first station according to real-time passenger flows and traffic conditions. In dynamic bus dispatching research, existing optimization models are usually based on the prediction and simulation of passenger flow data. The bus departure schemes are formulated accordingly, and the passenger arrival rate uncertainty must be considered. Robust optimization is a common and effective method to handle such uncertainty problems. This paper introduces a robust optimization method for single-line dynamic bus scheduling. By setting three scenarios—the benchmark passenger flow, high passenger flow, and low passenger flow—the robust optimization model of dynamic bus departures is established with consideration of different passenger arrival rates in different scenarios. A genetic algorithm (GA) is improved for minimizing the total passenger waiting time. The results obtained by the proposed optimization method are compared with those from a stochastic programming method. The standard deviation of the relative regret value with stochastic optimization is 5.42%, whereas that of the relative regret value with robust optimization is 0.62%. The stability of robust optimization is better, and the fluctuation degree is greatly reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingxin Liu & Xinggang Luo & Xu Wei & Yang Yu & Jiafu Tang, 2021. "Robust Optimization Model for Single Line Dynamic Bus Dispatching," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:73-:d:708396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/73/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/73/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan, Shangyao & Chi, Chin-Jen & Tang, Ching-Hui, 2006. "Inter-city bus routing and timetable setting under stochastic demands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 572-586, August.
    2. Yu, Chian-Son & Li, Han-Lin, 2000. "A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 385-397, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erfan Hassannayebi & Seyed Hessameddin Zegordi & Mohammad Reza Amin-Naseri & Masoud Yaghini, 2017. "Train timetabling at rapid rail transit lines: a robust multi-objective stochastic programming approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 435-477, July.
    2. Shangyao Yan & Ching-Hui Tang, 2008. "An Integrated Framework for Intercity Bus Scheduling Under Stochastic Bus Travel Times," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 318-335, August.
    3. Hashem Omrani & Farzane Adabi & Narges Adabi, 2017. "Designing an efficient supply chain network with uncertain data: a robust optimization—data envelopment analysis approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(7), pages 816-828, July.
    4. M. Shakibayifar & A. Sheikholeslami & F. Corman & E. Hassannayebi, 2020. "An integrated rescheduling model for minimizing train delays in the case of line blockage," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 59-87, March.
    5. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    6. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    7. Yulei Xie & Linrui Wang & Guohe Huang & Dehong Xia & Ling Ji, 2018. "A Stochastic Inexact Robust Model for Regional Energy System Management and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis—A Case Study of Zibo City, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    8. Vergidis, K. & Tiwari, A. & Majeed, B. & Roy, R., 2007. "Optimisation of business process designs: An algorithmic approach with multiple objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1-2), pages 105-121, September.
    9. Seyed Babak Ebrahimi & Ehsan Bagheri, 2022. "A multi-objective formulation for the closed-loop plastic supply chain under uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4725-4768, November.
    10. Meng, Qiang & Hei, Xiuling & Wang, Shuaian & Mao, Haijun, 2015. "Carrying capacity procurement of rail and shipping services for automobile delivery with uncertain demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 38-54.
    11. Lai, K.K. & Wang, Ming & Liang, L., 2007. "A stochastic approach to professional services firms' revenue optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 971-982, November.
    12. Yaser Taghinezhad, 2019. "Optimisation model for a chain logistics problem involving chilled food under conditions of uncertainty," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 29(2), pages 103-116.
    13. João Flávio de Freitas Almeida & Samuel Vieira Conceição & Luiz Ricardo Pinto & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda Júnior, 2018. "Flexibility evaluation of multiechelon supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Golpîra, Hêriş & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman, 2019. "A multi-objective risk-based robust optimization approach to energy management in smart residential buildings under combined demand and supply uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 1113-1129.
    15. Kenneth Stoop & Mario Pickavet & Didier Colle & Pieter Audenaert, 2024. "Selective Backhauls in Truck Transport with Risk Mitigation: Large Belgian Retailer Case Study," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 99-130, March.
    16. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    17. Gkiotsalitis, K. & Alesiani, F., 2019. "Robust timetable optimization for bus lines subject to resource and regulatory constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 30-51.
    18. Azaron, A. & Brown, K.N. & Tarim, S.A. & Modarres, M., 2008. "A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 129-138, November.
    19. Jian Li & Lu Zhang & Bu Liu & Ningning Shi & Liang Li & Haodong Yin, 2023. "Travel-Energy-Based Timetable Optimization in Urban Subway Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    20. Xie, Y.L. & Huang, G.H. & Li, W. & Ji, L., 2014. "Carbon and air pollutants constrained energy planning for clean power generation with a robust optimization model—A case study of Jining City, China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 150-167.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:73-:d:708396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.