IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p258-d712228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enabling Progress in Developing Economies: A Novel Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Green Technology Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ikram

    (School of Business Administration, Al Akhawyan University, Ifrane Avenue Hassan II, P.O. Box 104, Ifrane 53 000, Morocco)

  • Robert Sroufe

    (Donahue Graduate School of Business, Duquesne University, 820 Rockwell Hall, 600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburg, PA 15252, USA)

  • Usama Awan

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, The Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland)

  • Nabila Abid

    (Department of Economia Aziendale, University G. d’Annuzio Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

Abstract

Green technologies play an essential role in designing and developing sustainable and environmental strategies at a country level. With a growing emphasis on green technology strategies in strategic decision making, there is an opportunity for developing and implementing strategies to accelerate green technologies in developing economies. Therefore, this study develops an integrated strategic framework based on Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) for effective green technology planning. The SWOT approach scans internal and external factors and sub-factors essential for green technology planning in Pakistan. Subsequently, the Grey Analytical Hierarchical Process (GAHP) method is employed to compute weights of twenty-one subfactors. Finally, Grey Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (GTOPSIS) is used to prioritize eighteen strategies developed for sustainable green technology planning. Results reveal that high productivity potential in the agriculture sector, less foreign investment due to terrorism and security issues, decreasing the cost of green technologies, and the opportunity to build a positive image are key sub-factors for strategic green technology planning. In contrast, improving the security situation in the country to attract foreign direct investment, fewer taxes and duties on import of green technology and lenient rules for local business in transition, and plans and programs to promote green technology in the agriculture sector are observed as optimal strategies. This study is the first to propose a systematic, integrated framework for sustainable green technology planning in Pakistan. Our study fills a gap in the strategic planning and implementation process and provides pathways for policymakers in addressing impediments when implementing green technology planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ikram & Robert Sroufe & Usama Awan & Nabila Abid, 2021. "Enabling Progress in Developing Economies: A Novel Hybrid Decision-Making Model for Green Technology Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:258-:d:712228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/258/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/258/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hottenrott, Hanna & Rexhäuser, Sascha & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2016. "Organisational change and the productivity effects of green technology adoption," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 172-194.
    2. Burström, Thommie & Parida, Vinit & Lahti, Tom & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 85-95.
    3. Sikder, Arjita & Inekwe, John & Bhattacharya, Mita, 2019. "Economic output in the era of changing energy-mix for G20 countries: New evidence with trade openness and research and development investment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 930-938.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Developing a Sustainable Omnichannel Strategic Framework toward Circular Revolution: An Integrated Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Gayle Patrao & Ajit Karnik, 2023. "Identifying Drivers and Hindrances to the Disposal of Used Mobile Phones: A Study of User Behavior in the UAE," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, September.
    3. Bhavesh Kumar & Love Kumar & Avinash Kumar & Ramna Kumari & Uroosa Tagar & Claudio Sassanelli, 2024. "Green finance in circular economy: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 16419-16459, July.
    4. Muhammad Muhitur Rahman & Mohammad Shahedur Rahman & Saidur R. Chowdhury & Alaeldeen Elhaj & Shaikh Abdur Razzak & Syed Abu Shoaib & Md Kamrul Islam & Mohammed Monirul Islam & Sayeed Rushd & Syed Masi, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Industrial Processes and Product Use Sector of Saudi Arabia—An Emerging Challenge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Love Kumar & Farah Nadeem & Maggie Sloan & Jonas Restle-Steinert & Matthew J. Deitch & Sohail Ali Naqvi & Avinash Kumar & Claudio Sassanelli, 2022. "Fostering Green Finance for Sustainable Development: A Focus on Textile and Leather Small Medium Enterprises in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    6. Luay Jum’a & Muhammad Ikram & Ziad Alkalha & Maher Alaraj, 2022. "Do Companies Adopt Big Data as Determinants of Sustainability: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Jordan," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(4), pages 479-494, December.
    7. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Green Furniture Brands in the Marketing 4.0 Period: An Integrated MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-32, August.
    8. Khalid Zaman & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Usama Awan & Wiwik Handayani & Hailan Salamun & Abdul Rashid Abdul Aziz & Mohd Khata Jabor & Kamalularifin Subari, 2022. "Transportation-Induced Carbon Emissions Jeopardize Healthcare Logistics Sustainability: Toward a Healthier Today and a Better Tomorrow," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Tuğba Yeğin & Muhammad Ikram, 2022. "Analysis of Consumers’ Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions: An Expansion of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Hanzhe Li & Hui Chen, 2023. "Research on Green Consumption Based on Visual Evaluation Method—Evidence from Stone Flooring Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Md Ariful Haque & Zifei Liu & Akinbile Demilade & Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar, 2022. "Assessing the Environmental Footprint of Distiller-Dried Grains with Soluble Diet as a Substitute for Standard Corn–Soybean for Swine Production in the United States of America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Green Product and Process Innovation, Corporate Environmental Ethics and Competitive Advantages among Manufacturing Firms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(2), pages 51-61.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Hui & Qi, Shaozhou & Chen, Yuanzhi, 2023. "Using green technology for a better tomorrow: How enterprises and government utilize the carbon trading system and incentive policies," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Gatti, Donatella, 2022. "Going green and (un)equal ? Political coalitions, redistribution, and the environment," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Hottenrott Hanna & Peters Bettina & Rammer Christian, 2024. "Wie steht es um die Innovationsfähigkeit Deutschlands?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 104(4), pages 230-235, April.
    4. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2023. "Artificial intelligence-driven scalability and its impact on the sustainability and valuation of traditional firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Martin, R. & de Haas, Ralph & Muuls, Mirabelle & Schweiger, Helena, 2021. "Managerial and Financial Barriers to the Net-Zero Transition," Other publications TiSEM f0572d8a-40d7-458f-bb43-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Fredström, Ashkan & Parida, Vinit & Wincent, Joakim & Sjödin, David & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2022. "What is the Market Value of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? The Role of Innovativeness and Collaboration for Performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    7. Ancillai, Chiara & Sabatini, Andrea & Gatti, Marco & Perna, Andrea, 2023. "Digital technology and business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    8. Laudien, Sven M. & Reuter, Ute & Sendra Garcia, Francisco Javier & Botella-Carrubi, Dolores, 2024. "Digital advancement and its effect on business model design: Qualitative-empirical insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    9. Pramanik, Paritosh & Jana, Rabin K. & Ghosh, Indranil, 2024. "AI readiness enablers in developed and developing economies: Findings from the XGBoost regression and explainable AI framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    10. Davide Antonioli & Claudia Ghisetti & Stefano Pareglio & Marco Quatrosi, 2022. "Innovation, Circular economy practices and organisational settings: empirical evidence from Italy," Working Papers 2022.07, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    11. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    12. Archana Srivastava & Somesh Kumar Mathur & Rachna Mathur & Prabir De, 2023. "Assessment of Possible Economic Alignment Between G20 Nations with Special Focus on India, G7 and G12: A General Equilibrium Analysis," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 79(4), pages 535-551, December.
    13. Grego, Marica & Magnani, Giovanna & Denicolai, Stefano, 2024. "Transform to adapt or resilient by design? How organizations can foster resilience through business model transformation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    14. Céline Bonnet & Jan Philip Schain, 2020. "An Empirical Analysis Of Mergers: Efficiency Gains And Impact On Consumer Prices," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 1-35.
    15. Rith, Monorom & Fillone, Alexis M. & Biona, Jose Bienvenido Manuel M., 2020. "Energy and environmental benefits and policy implications for private passenger vehicles in an emerging metropolis of Southeast Asia – A case study of Metro Manila," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    16. Davide Antonioli & Grazia Cecere & Massimiliano Mazzanti, 2018. "Information communication technologies and environmental innovations in firms: joint adoptions and productivity effects," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(11), pages 1905-1933, September.
    17. Sanjit Dhami, 2023. "Green Technology Adoption, Complexity, and the Role of Public Policy: A Simple Theoretical Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 10364, CESifo.
    18. Mostaghel, Rana & Oghazi, Pejvak & Parida, Vinit & Sohrabpour, Vahid, 2022. "Digitalization driven retail business model innovation: Evaluation of past and avenues for future research trends," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 134-145.
    19. Sugam Agarwal & Smruti Ranjan Behera, 2022. "Geographical concentration of knowledge and technology-intensive industries in India: empirical evidence from establishment-level analysis," Indian Economic Review, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 513-552, December.
    20. Manis, K.T. & Madhavaram, Sreedhar, 2023. "AI-Enabled marketing capabilities and the hierarchy of capabilities: Conceptualization, proposition development, and research avenues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:258-:d:712228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.