IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i9p5128-d548419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ and Farmers’ Perceptions in Europe Regarding the Use of Composted Bedding Material from Cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Marija Klopčič

    (Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1230 Domžale, Slovenia)

  • Karmen Erjavec

    (Faculty of Economics and Informatics, University of Novo Mesto, SI-8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

  • Megan Waldrop

    (TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, DE-85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Jutta Roosen

    (TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, DE-85354 Freising, Germany)

  • Petra Engel

    (Institut für Tierzüchtung, Justus-Liebig Universität Gießen, DE-35390 Gießen, Germany)

  • Paul Galama

    (Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, NL-6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands)

  • Abele Kuipers

    (Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, NL-6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

By-products like sawdust and straw are applied in compost bedded-pack barns (CBP) for cattle. These materials, which are gradually mixed with excreta and undergo a composting process, serve as a lying bed for the cattle. This study aims to assess the perception of consumers and farmers regarding the use of CBP during the grazing season of cattle for raising other animals or for growing food crops. This was examined by combining surveys with consumers from eight European countries and cattle farmers, focus groups with consumers, and in-depth interviews with individual farmers who implemented alternative uses of compost. The results showed that farmers preferred the compost bedded-pack system to the cubicle system in terms of sustainability and market aspects, although the cost of the bedding material required for CBP was seen as a significant negative aspect. Around half of all consumers indicated that the compost can be used for non-edible products and 26% indicated the compost can be used for raising other animals. Furthermore, 5% of consumers felt that compost should not be used for any other purpose. There were statistically significant differences between countries; therefore, regional specificities should be taken into account when marketing products from compost in CBP barns.

Suggested Citation

  • Marija Klopčič & Karmen Erjavec & Megan Waldrop & Jutta Roosen & Petra Engel & Paul Galama & Abele Kuipers, 2021. "Consumers’ and Farmers’ Perceptions in Europe Regarding the Use of Composted Bedding Material from Cattle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5128-:d:548419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5128/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/5128/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wachenheim, Cheryl J. & Rathge, Richard W., 2000. "Societal Perceptions Of Agriculture," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23541, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. Niccolò Pampuro & Federica Caffaro & Eugenio Cavallo, 2018. "Reuse of Animal Manure: A Case Study on Stakeholders’ Perceptions about Pelletized Compost in Northwestern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Klopčič, Marija & Kuipers, Abele & Malak-Rawlikowska, Agata & Stalgiene, Aldona & Ule, Anita & Erjavec, Karmen, 2019. "Dairy farmers' strategies in four European countries before and after abolition of the milk quota," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lukáš Čechura & Zdeňka Žáková Kroupová & Irena Benešová, 2021. "Productivity and Efficiency in European Milk Production: Can We Observe the Effects of Abolishing Milk Quotas?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Simon Gwara & Edilegnaw Wale & Alfred Odindo & Chris Buckley, 2021. "Attitudes and Perceptions on the Agricultural Use of Human Excreta and Human Excreta Derived Materials: A Scoping Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-30, February.
    3. Dmytro Serebrennikov & Fiona Thorne & Zein Kallas & Sinéad N. McCarthy, 2020. "Factors Influencing Adoption of Sustainable Farming Practices in Europe: A Systemic Review of Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    4. Eberle, Phillip R. & Rendleman, C. Matthew & Peterson, William C., 2006. "Who is Willing to Pay to Keep Livestock Production Away?," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35301, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Ramūnas Mieldažys & Eglė Jotautienė & Algirdas Jasinskas, 2019. "The Opportunities of Sustainable Biomass Ashes and Poultry Manure Recycling for Granulated Fertilizers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Artur Wilczyński & Ewa Kołoszycz, 2021. "Economic Resilience of EU Dairy Farms: An Evaluation of Economic Viability," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Xiaohong Zhou & Donghong Ding, 2022. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness and Behaviors in Organic Agriculture Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Farmers in Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Simon Gwara & Edilegnaw Wale & Alfred Odindo & Chris Buckley, 2020. "Why do We Know So Much and Yet So Little? A Scoping Review of Willingness to Pay for Human Excreta Derived Material in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Niccolò Pampuro & Federica Caffaro & Eugenio Cavallo, 2020. "Farmers’ Attitudes toward On-Farm Adoption of Soil Organic Matter in Piedmont Region, Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-7, January.
    10. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Training on Beef Cattle Farmers’ Installation of Biogas Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Ireti Emmanuel Adesida & William Nkomoki & Miroslava Bavorova & Mustapha Yakubu Madaki, 2021. "Effects of Agricultural Programmes and Land Ownership on the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Mahon, N. & Crute, I. & Di Bonito, M. & Simmons, E.A. & Islam, M.M., 2018. "Towards a broad-based and holistic framework of Sustainable Intensification indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 576-597.
    13. Niccolò Pampuro & Patrizia Busato & Eugenio Cavallo, 2018. "Gaseous Emissions after Soil Application of Pellet Made from Composted Pig Slurry Solid Fraction: Effect of Application Method and Pellet Diameter," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    14. Maria Zuba-Ciszewska & Aleksandra Kowalska & Aneta Brodziak & Louise Manning, 2023. "Organic Milk Production Sector in Poland: Driving the Potential to Meet Future Market, Societal and Environmental Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    15. Garcia, Luis & Laepple, Doris & Dillon, Emma & Thorne, Fiona, 2020. "The role of hired labor in transient and persistent technical efficiency on Irish dairy farms," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304395, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Mariangela Diacono & Alessandro Persiani & Elena Testani & Francesco Montemurro & Corrado Ciaccia, 2019. "Recycling Agricultural Wastes and By-products in Organic Farming: Biofertilizer Production, Yield Performance and Carbon Footprint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-17, July.
    17. Sroka, Wojciech & Bojarszczuk, Jolanta & Satoła, Łukasz & Szczepańska, Barbara & Sulewski, Piotr & Lisek, Sławomir & Luty, Lidia & Zioło, Monika, 2021. "Understanding residents’ acceptance of professional urban and peri-urban farming: A socio-economic study in Polish metropolitan areas," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    18. Guilhem Dardier & Derek P. T. H. Christie & Jean Simos & Anne Roué Le Gall & Nicola L. Cantoreggi & Lorris Tabbone & Yoann Mallet & Françoise Jabot, 2023. "Health Impact Assessment to Promote Urban Health: A Trans-Disciplinary Case Study in Strasbourg, France," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Jasper Grashuis, 2021. "A price premium for the farmer‐owned label? A choice experiment with milk consumers in the Netherlands," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(4), pages 749-763, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:9:p:5128-:d:548419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.